Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Estefania LOZA |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A mind-reading puzzle: Autistic people are more efficient at a theory-of-mind task / Estefania LOZA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 101 (March 2023)
[article]
Titre : A mind-reading puzzle: Autistic people are more efficient at a theory-of-mind task Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Estefania LOZA, Auteur ; Frédérique AMSELLEM, Auteur ; Tiziana ZALLA, Auteur ; Ariane CARTIGNY, Auteur ; Marion LEBOYER, Auteur ; Richard DELORME, Auteur ; Franck RAMUS, Auteur ; Baudouin FORGEOT D'ARC, Auteur Article en page(s) : 102105 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Social cognition Theory of mind Executive control Referential communication Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Theory of Mind (ToM) is essential to adapt in social situations; however, a ToM deficit might be involved in autism. To better understand how ToM reasoning affects problem solving in autistic and non-autistic individuals, we compared autistic and non-autistic children and adults in a series of problems presented in social and non-social framings, using an adapted version of a classical referential communication task. In the social framing, participants were asked to anticipate the behavior of an agent who might ignore some components of the scene. In the non-social framing, the task required participants to consider and ignore similar features of the scene, but an agent was not involved. Simply framing the task as a social one increased the difficulty, particularly for non-autistic participants. Interestingly, the framing had less of an impact on autistic participants, who showed better performance in the social task relative to non-autistics and maintained similar performance across framings. We propose that autistic participants might have translated the social instructions into a general rule that proved more efficient in this situation. Our findings suggest a critical distinction between ToM understanding and the continuous use of a ToM strategy in repeated situations. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102105 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=492
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 101 (March 2023) . - 102105[article] A mind-reading puzzle: Autistic people are more efficient at a theory-of-mind task [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Estefania LOZA, Auteur ; Frédérique AMSELLEM, Auteur ; Tiziana ZALLA, Auteur ; Ariane CARTIGNY, Auteur ; Marion LEBOYER, Auteur ; Richard DELORME, Auteur ; Franck RAMUS, Auteur ; Baudouin FORGEOT D'ARC, Auteur . - 102105.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 101 (March 2023) . - 102105
Mots-clés : Autism Social cognition Theory of mind Executive control Referential communication Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Theory of Mind (ToM) is essential to adapt in social situations; however, a ToM deficit might be involved in autism. To better understand how ToM reasoning affects problem solving in autistic and non-autistic individuals, we compared autistic and non-autistic children and adults in a series of problems presented in social and non-social framings, using an adapted version of a classical referential communication task. In the social framing, participants were asked to anticipate the behavior of an agent who might ignore some components of the scene. In the non-social framing, the task required participants to consider and ignore similar features of the scene, but an agent was not involved. Simply framing the task as a social one increased the difficulty, particularly for non-autistic participants. Interestingly, the framing had less of an impact on autistic participants, who showed better performance in the social task relative to non-autistics and maintained similar performance across framings. We propose that autistic participants might have translated the social instructions into a general rule that proved more efficient in this situation. Our findings suggest a critical distinction between ToM understanding and the continuous use of a ToM strategy in repeated situations. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102105 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=492