1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Satisficing'

Exploring maximizing, satisficing and minimizing tendency in decision-making among autistic and neurotypical individuals / Nicky ROGGE in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 92 (April 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 92 (April 2022) . - 101935 Titre : Exploring maximizing, satisficing and minimizing tendency in decision-making among autistic and neurotypical individuals Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Nicky ROGGE, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101935 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Decision-making  Choice-making  Decision making tendency inventory  Maximizing  Satisficing  Minimizing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The tendency to maximize is one of the most frequently studied personal traits in choice-making and decision-making. In spite of the large resemblances between the decision behaviour that is characteristic for maximizers and the decision behaviour displayed by individuals with autism, and the considerable overlap in the list of decision problems and decision experiences commonly reported by maximizers and individuals with autism, the question whether individuals with autism are more maximizing in decision-making as compared to neurotypical controls, has remained unexamined in the literature. The paper measures and compares the tendency to maximize, satisfice, and minimize in choice- and decision-making among autistic individuals and age, gender- and education degree-matched neurotypical individuals. Method The Decision Making Tendency Inventory measurement scale (Misuraca et al., 2015) is used to measure six types of decision-making tendency: fearful maximizing, resolute maximizing, more ambitious satisficing, less ambitious satisficing, parsimonious minimizing, and indolent minimizing. A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and comparison of the differences in latent means is performed. Results The results demonstrate that autistic individuals are similar to neurotypical individuals when it comes to having a tendency to satisfice or minimize in decision-making, however, autistic individuals do score higher in terms of adopting a fearful and resolute maximizing tendency than neurotypical individuals. Conclusions Results suggest that higher maximizing tendency may explain for some of the difficulties experienced by autistic individuals in decision-making En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101935 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=459 [article] Exploring maximizing, satisficing and minimizing tendency in decision-making among autistic and neurotypical individuals [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Nicky ROGGE, Auteur . - 101935. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 92 (April 2022) . - 101935 Mots-clés : Autism  Decision-making  Choice-making  Decision making tendency inventory  Maximizing  Satisficing  Minimizing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The tendency to maximize is one of the most frequently studied personal traits in choice-making and decision-making. In spite of the large resemblances between the decision behaviour that is characteristic for maximizers and the decision behaviour displayed by individuals with autism, and the considerable overlap in the list of decision problems and decision experiences commonly reported by maximizers and individuals with autism, the question whether individuals with autism are more maximizing in decision-making as compared to neurotypical controls, has remained unexamined in the literature. The paper measures and compares the tendency to maximize, satisfice, and minimize in choice- and decision-making among autistic individuals and age, gender- and education degree-matched neurotypical individuals. Method The Decision Making Tendency Inventory measurement scale (Misuraca et al., 2015) is used to measure six types of decision-making tendency: fearful maximizing, resolute maximizing, more ambitious satisficing, less ambitious satisficing, parsimonious minimizing, and indolent minimizing. A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and comparison of the differences in latent means is performed. Results The results demonstrate that autistic individuals are similar to neurotypical individuals when it comes to having a tendency to satisfice or minimize in decision-making, however, autistic individuals do score higher in terms of adopting a fearful and resolute maximizing tendency than neurotypical individuals. Conclusions Results suggest that higher maximizing tendency may explain for some of the difficulties experienced by autistic individuals in decision-making En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101935 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=459