Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'autism-spectrum-disorder Child-Symptom-Inventory-4 autism Asperger's-syndrome PDD-NOS pervasive-developmental-disorder'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Relative clinical utility of three child symptom inventory-4 scoring algorithms for differentiating children with autism spectrum disorder vs. attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder / Carla DEVINCENT in Autism Research, 2-6 (December 2009)
[article]
Titre : Relative clinical utility of three child symptom inventory-4 scoring algorithms for differentiating children with autism spectrum disorder vs. attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Carla DEVINCENT, Auteur ; Kenneth D. GADOW, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : p.312-321 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism-spectrum-disorder Child-Symptom-Inventory-4 autism Asperger's-syndrome PDD-NOS pervasive-developmental-disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Objective: The present study compared three separate Child Symptom Inventory-4 (CSI-4) scoring algorithms for differentiating children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from youngsters with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: Parents/teachers completed the CSI-4, a DSM-IV-referenced rating scale, for 6 to 12-year-old clinical referrals with ASD (N=186) and ADHD (N=251). Algorithms were based on either all CSI-4 items (forward logistic regressions) or the 12 DSM-IV symptoms of pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) included in the CSI-4. Results: ROC analyses indicated generally good to excellent values for area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive power. Algorithms for parent ratings were superior to teacher ratings. The algorithm based solely on PDD symptoms evidenced the greatest generalizability. Conclusion: Although algorithms generated from regression analyses produced greater clinical utility for specific samples, the PDD-based algorithm resulted in greater stability across samples. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.106 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=968
in Autism Research > 2-6 (December 2009) . - p.312-321[article] Relative clinical utility of three child symptom inventory-4 scoring algorithms for differentiating children with autism spectrum disorder vs. attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Carla DEVINCENT, Auteur ; Kenneth D. GADOW, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.312-321.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 2-6 (December 2009) . - p.312-321
Mots-clés : autism-spectrum-disorder Child-Symptom-Inventory-4 autism Asperger's-syndrome PDD-NOS pervasive-developmental-disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Objective: The present study compared three separate Child Symptom Inventory-4 (CSI-4) scoring algorithms for differentiating children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from youngsters with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: Parents/teachers completed the CSI-4, a DSM-IV-referenced rating scale, for 6 to 12-year-old clinical referrals with ASD (N=186) and ADHD (N=251). Algorithms were based on either all CSI-4 items (forward logistic regressions) or the 12 DSM-IV symptoms of pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) included in the CSI-4. Results: ROC analyses indicated generally good to excellent values for area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive power. Algorithms for parent ratings were superior to teacher ratings. The algorithm based solely on PDD symptoms evidenced the greatest generalizability. Conclusion: Although algorithms generated from regression analyses produced greater clinical utility for specific samples, the PDD-based algorithm resulted in greater stability across samples. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.106 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=968