Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'embodied'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Cognitive Mechanisms underlying visual perspective taking in typical and ASC children / Amy PEARSON in Autism Research, 9-1 (January 2016)
[article]
Titre : Cognitive Mechanisms underlying visual perspective taking in typical and ASC children Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy PEARSON, Auteur ; Lauren MARSH, Auteur ; Danielle ROPAR, Auteur ; Antonia HAMILTON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.121-130 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum conditions visual perspective taking mental rotation embodied cognitive mechanisms Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Previous research has suggested that people with Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) may have difficulty with visual perspective taking (VPT) but it is not clear how this relates to different strategies that can be used in perspective taking tasks. The current study examined VPT in 30 children with autism and 30 verbal mental age matched typical children, in comparison to mental rotation (MR) abilities and body representation abilities. Using a similar paradigm to Hamilton, Brindley, and Frith [2009] all children completed three tasks: a VPT task in which children decided what a toy on a table would look like from a different points of view; a MR task in which the child decided what a toy would look like after it had been rotated; and a body posture matching task, in which children matched pictures of a body shown from different viewpoints. Results showed that children with ASC performed better than the typically developing children on the MR task, and at a similar level on the VPT task and body matching task. Importantly, in the typical children VPT performance was predicted by performance on the body matching task, whereas in the ASC children VPT performance was predicted by MR ability. These findings suggest that differences in VPT in ASC may be explained by the use of a spatial rotation strategy rather than the embodied egocentric transformation strategy used by typical children. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.1501 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=282
in Autism Research > 9-1 (January 2016) . - p.121-130[article] Cognitive Mechanisms underlying visual perspective taking in typical and ASC children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy PEARSON, Auteur ; Lauren MARSH, Auteur ; Danielle ROPAR, Auteur ; Antonia HAMILTON, Auteur . - p.121-130.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 9-1 (January 2016) . - p.121-130
Mots-clés : autism spectrum conditions visual perspective taking mental rotation embodied cognitive mechanisms Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Previous research has suggested that people with Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) may have difficulty with visual perspective taking (VPT) but it is not clear how this relates to different strategies that can be used in perspective taking tasks. The current study examined VPT in 30 children with autism and 30 verbal mental age matched typical children, in comparison to mental rotation (MR) abilities and body representation abilities. Using a similar paradigm to Hamilton, Brindley, and Frith [2009] all children completed three tasks: a VPT task in which children decided what a toy on a table would look like from a different points of view; a MR task in which the child decided what a toy would look like after it had been rotated; and a body posture matching task, in which children matched pictures of a body shown from different viewpoints. Results showed that children with ASC performed better than the typically developing children on the MR task, and at a similar level on the VPT task and body matching task. Importantly, in the typical children VPT performance was predicted by performance on the body matching task, whereas in the ASC children VPT performance was predicted by MR ability. These findings suggest that differences in VPT in ASC may be explained by the use of a spatial rotation strategy rather than the embodied egocentric transformation strategy used by typical children. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.1501 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=282