Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Uberto GATTI |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood / Amélie PETITCLERC in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-3 (March 2013)
[article]
Titre : Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amélie PETITCLERC, Auteur ; Uberto GATTI, Auteur ; Frank VITARO, Auteur ; Richard E. TREMBLAY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.291-297 Mots-clés : Criminal behavior violence recidivism penal justice juvenile offenders Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The juvenile justice system’s interventions are expected to help reduce recidivism. However, previous studies suggest that official processing in juvenile court fails to reduce adolescents’ criminal behavior in the following year. Longer term effects have not yet been investigated with a rigorous method. This study used propensity score matching to assess the impact of juvenile court processing into young adulthood. Method: Participants were part of a prospective longitudinal study of 1,037 boys from low- socioeconomic areas of Montreal, followed from ages 6–25 years. During their adolescence, 176 participants were processed in juvenile court, whereas 225 were arrested, but not sent to court. Propensity score matching was used to balance the group of participants exposed to juvenile court and the unexposed comparison group on 14 preadolescent child, family and peer characteristics. The two groups were compared on their official adult criminal outcomes. Results: The risk of conviction for an adult offence was 50.0% for court-processed participants compared with 24.3% for their matched counterparts, OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.80–5.44. Court-processed participants committed an average of 0.39 violent crimes, compared with 0.15 for their matched counterparts; Poisson model IRR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.39–4.87. They also committed an average of 2.38 nonviolent crimes, compared to 1.30 for their matched counterparts, IRR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.19–2.93. Conclusions: Rather than decreasing recidivism, juvenile court intervention increased both violent and nonviolent future crimes. Along with previous studies, this study highlights a pressing need for more research and knowledge transfer about effective interventions to reduce recidivism among youths who commit crime. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02616.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=191
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-3 (March 2013) . - p.291-297[article] Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amélie PETITCLERC, Auteur ; Uberto GATTI, Auteur ; Frank VITARO, Auteur ; Richard E. TREMBLAY, Auteur . - p.291-297.
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-3 (March 2013) . - p.291-297
Mots-clés : Criminal behavior violence recidivism penal justice juvenile offenders Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The juvenile justice system’s interventions are expected to help reduce recidivism. However, previous studies suggest that official processing in juvenile court fails to reduce adolescents’ criminal behavior in the following year. Longer term effects have not yet been investigated with a rigorous method. This study used propensity score matching to assess the impact of juvenile court processing into young adulthood. Method: Participants were part of a prospective longitudinal study of 1,037 boys from low- socioeconomic areas of Montreal, followed from ages 6–25 years. During their adolescence, 176 participants were processed in juvenile court, whereas 225 were arrested, but not sent to court. Propensity score matching was used to balance the group of participants exposed to juvenile court and the unexposed comparison group on 14 preadolescent child, family and peer characteristics. The two groups were compared on their official adult criminal outcomes. Results: The risk of conviction for an adult offence was 50.0% for court-processed participants compared with 24.3% for their matched counterparts, OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.80–5.44. Court-processed participants committed an average of 0.39 violent crimes, compared with 0.15 for their matched counterparts; Poisson model IRR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.39–4.87. They also committed an average of 2.38 nonviolent crimes, compared to 1.30 for their matched counterparts, IRR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.19–2.93. Conclusions: Rather than decreasing recidivism, juvenile court intervention increased both violent and nonviolent future crimes. Along with previous studies, this study highlights a pressing need for more research and knowledge transfer about effective interventions to reduce recidivism among youths who commit crime. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02616.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=191 Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice / Uberto GATTI in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50-8 (August 2009)
[article]
Titre : Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Uberto GATTI, Auteur ; Richard E. TREMBLAY, Auteur ; Frank VITARO, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : p.991-998 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Juvenile-justice labeling peer-contagion juvenile-delinquency adult-crime Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study uses data from a community sample of 779 low-SES boys to investigate whether intervention by the juvenile justice system is determined, at least in part, by particular individual, familial and social conditions, and whether intervention by the juvenile courts during adolescence increases involvement in adult crime.
Method: The study considers self-reported crime in childhood and adolescence, and introduces individual, familial and social variables into its analysis.
Results: The results show that youths who are poor, impulsive, poorly supervised by their parents, and exposed to deviant friends are more likely, for the same degree of antisocial behavior, to undergo intervention by the Juvenile Court, and that this intervention greatly increases the likelihood of involvement with the penal system in adulthood. The results also show that the various measures recommended by the Juvenile Court exert a differential criminogenic effect; those that involve placement have the most negative impact.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=788
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-8 (August 2009) . - p.991-998[article] Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Uberto GATTI, Auteur ; Richard E. TREMBLAY, Auteur ; Frank VITARO, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.991-998.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-8 (August 2009) . - p.991-998
Mots-clés : Juvenile-justice labeling peer-contagion juvenile-delinquency adult-crime Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study uses data from a community sample of 779 low-SES boys to investigate whether intervention by the juvenile justice system is determined, at least in part, by particular individual, familial and social conditions, and whether intervention by the juvenile courts during adolescence increases involvement in adult crime.
Method: The study considers self-reported crime in childhood and adolescence, and introduces individual, familial and social variables into its analysis.
Results: The results show that youths who are poor, impulsive, poorly supervised by their parents, and exposed to deviant friends are more likely, for the same degree of antisocial behavior, to undergo intervention by the Juvenile Court, and that this intervention greatly increases the likelihood of involvement with the penal system in adulthood. The results also show that the various measures recommended by the Juvenile Court exert a differential criminogenic effect; those that involve placement have the most negative impact.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=788