Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Bifactor models'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD / G. LEONARD BURNS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55-4 (April 2014)
[article]
Titre : Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : G. LEONARD BURNS, Auteur ; Marcela Alves DE MOURA, Auteur ; Theodore P. BEAUCHAINE, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.393-401 Mots-clés : ADHD oppositional defiant disorder bifactor models dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity theories Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Objective To determine if ADHD/ODD symptoms are better represented by a bifactor model of disruptive behavior [general disruptive behavior factor along with specific inattention (IN), specific hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and specific oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) factors] than an ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD three-factor model. Method Mothers' and fathers' ratings of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD symptoms in a community sample of 4,658 children and adolescents (53% female) from Brazil, Thailand, and the US were used to evaluate the measurement models. Results The bifactor model of disruptive behavior provided a better fit than the three factor model. The bifactor model also occurred with mothers' and fathers' ratings of male and female children and adolescents. Conclusions Consistent with predictions derived from recently articulated dual-pathway and trait-impulsivity models of externalizing liability, and from behavioral genetics studies indicating near complete overlap in vulnerability to ADHD and ODD, ADHD and ODD symptoms arose from a single, general disruptive behavior factor, which accounted for all of the variance in HI subscale scores and over half of the variance IN and ODD subscales. Thus, IN, HI, and ODD subscale scores strongly reflect a general disruptive behavior factor – not the specific content of their respective constructs. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12165 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=230
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-4 (April 2014) . - p.393-401[article] Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / G. LEONARD BURNS, Auteur ; Marcela Alves DE MOURA, Auteur ; Theodore P. BEAUCHAINE, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur . - p.393-401.
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-4 (April 2014) . - p.393-401
Mots-clés : ADHD oppositional defiant disorder bifactor models dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity theories Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Objective To determine if ADHD/ODD symptoms are better represented by a bifactor model of disruptive behavior [general disruptive behavior factor along with specific inattention (IN), specific hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and specific oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) factors] than an ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD three-factor model. Method Mothers' and fathers' ratings of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD symptoms in a community sample of 4,658 children and adolescents (53% female) from Brazil, Thailand, and the US were used to evaluate the measurement models. Results The bifactor model of disruptive behavior provided a better fit than the three factor model. The bifactor model also occurred with mothers' and fathers' ratings of male and female children and adolescents. Conclusions Consistent with predictions derived from recently articulated dual-pathway and trait-impulsivity models of externalizing liability, and from behavioral genetics studies indicating near complete overlap in vulnerability to ADHD and ODD, ADHD and ODD symptoms arose from a single, general disruptive behavior factor, which accounted for all of the variance in HI subscale scores and over half of the variance IN and ODD subscales. Thus, IN, HI, and ODD subscale scores strongly reflect a general disruptive behavior factor – not the specific content of their respective constructs. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12165 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=230 Toward precision therapeutics: general and specific factors differentiate symptom change in depressed adolescents / Madison AITKEN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61-9 (September 2020)
[article]
Titre : Toward precision therapeutics: general and specific factors differentiate symptom change in depressed adolescents Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Madison AITKEN, Auteur ; John D. HALTIGAN, Auteur ; Peter SZATMARI, Auteur ; Bernadka DUBICKA, Auteur ; Peter FONAGY, Auteur ; Raphael KELVIN, Auteur ; Nick MIDGLEY, Auteur ; Shirley REYNOLDS, Auteur ; Paul O. WILKINSON, Auteur ; Ian M. GOODYER, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p.998-1008 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Bifactor models adolescent depression psychopathology psychotherapy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The longitudinal course of multiple symptom domains in adolescents treated for major depression is not known. Revealing the temporal course of general and specific psychopathology factors, including potential differences between psychotherapies, may aid therapeutic decision-making. METHODS: Participants were adolescents with major depressive disorder (aged 11-17; 75% female; N = 465) who were part of the IMPACT trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy, short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and brief psychosocial intervention. Self-reported symptoms at baseline and 6, 12, 36, 52, and 86 weeks postrandomization were analyzed with bifactor modeling. RESULTS: General psychopathology factor scores decreased across treatment and one-year follow-up. Specific melancholic features and depressive cognitions factors decreased from baseline to 6 weeks. Conduct problems decreased across treatment and follow-up. Anxiety increased by 6 weeks and then reverted to baseline levels. Obsessions-compulsions did not change. Changes in general and specific factors were not significantly different between the three psychotherapies during treatment. During follow-up, however, conduct problems decreased more in brief psychosocial intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy (1.02, 95% Bayes credible interval 0.25, 1.96), but not versus short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical response signature in this trial is best revealed by rapid reductions in depression symptoms and general psychopathology. Protracted improvements in general psychopathology and conduct problems subsequently occur. Psychosocial treatments for adolescent depression have comparable effects on general and specific psychopathology, although a psychoeducational, goal-focused approach may be indicated for youth with comorbid conduct problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13194 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=430
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 61-9 (September 2020) . - p.998-1008[article] Toward precision therapeutics: general and specific factors differentiate symptom change in depressed adolescents [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Madison AITKEN, Auteur ; John D. HALTIGAN, Auteur ; Peter SZATMARI, Auteur ; Bernadka DUBICKA, Auteur ; Peter FONAGY, Auteur ; Raphael KELVIN, Auteur ; Nick MIDGLEY, Auteur ; Shirley REYNOLDS, Auteur ; Paul O. WILKINSON, Auteur ; Ian M. GOODYER, Auteur . - 2020 . - p.998-1008.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 61-9 (September 2020) . - p.998-1008
Mots-clés : Bifactor models adolescent depression psychopathology psychotherapy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The longitudinal course of multiple symptom domains in adolescents treated for major depression is not known. Revealing the temporal course of general and specific psychopathology factors, including potential differences between psychotherapies, may aid therapeutic decision-making. METHODS: Participants were adolescents with major depressive disorder (aged 11-17; 75% female; N = 465) who were part of the IMPACT trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy, short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and brief psychosocial intervention. Self-reported symptoms at baseline and 6, 12, 36, 52, and 86 weeks postrandomization were analyzed with bifactor modeling. RESULTS: General psychopathology factor scores decreased across treatment and one-year follow-up. Specific melancholic features and depressive cognitions factors decreased from baseline to 6 weeks. Conduct problems decreased across treatment and follow-up. Anxiety increased by 6 weeks and then reverted to baseline levels. Obsessions-compulsions did not change. Changes in general and specific factors were not significantly different between the three psychotherapies during treatment. During follow-up, however, conduct problems decreased more in brief psychosocial intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy (1.02, 95% Bayes credible interval 0.25, 1.96), but not versus short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical response signature in this trial is best revealed by rapid reductions in depression symptoms and general psychopathology. Protracted improvements in general psychopathology and conduct problems subsequently occur. Psychosocial treatments for adolescent depression have comparable effects on general and specific psychopathology, although a psychoeducational, goal-focused approach may be indicated for youth with comorbid conduct problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13194 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=430