Assessing implementation of comprehensive treatment models for young children with ASD: Reliability and validity of two measures / Kara HUME in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5-4 (October-December 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 5-4 (October-December 2011) . - p.1430-1440 Titre : Assessing implementation of comprehensive treatment models for young children with ASD: Reliability and validity of two measures Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Kara HUME, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur ; Matt MCBEE, Auteur ; Drew C. COMAN, Auteur ; Anibal GUTIERREZ, Auteur ; Evelyn SHAW, Auteur ; Laurie SPERRY, Auteur ; Michael ALESSANDRI, Auteur ; Samuel L. ODOM, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.1430-1440 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder  Comprehensive treatment models  Treatment implementation  Treatment integrity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Treatment implementation is an under-studied and under-reported aspect of intervention studies involving individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One primary area of concern is the lack of reliable and valid implementation measures, which allows a conclusive association to be drawn between the intervention and participant outcomes. This study examined the psychometric properties of two implementation measures developed for comprehensive treatment models serving preschoolers with ASD (i.e., LEAP and TEACCH). Both of the measures were completed in classrooms using LEAP or TEACCH instructional approaches as well as in classrooms in which a business-as-usual or non-model specific treatment approach was used. Across four months of one school year, a maximum of 4 observations were conducted in each of the 34 classrooms involved in the study. Results indicated that both implementation tools are reliable and valid, and that particular subscales of these measures allowed for discrimination of the three types of classrooms from each other. This step of psychometrically validating implementation measures as part of conducting efficacy studies may yield more robust associations between implementation and intervention effects. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=125 [article] Assessing implementation of comprehensive treatment models for young children with ASD: Reliability and validity of two measures [texte imprimé] / Kara HUME, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur ; Matt MCBEE, Auteur ; Drew C. COMAN, Auteur ; Anibal GUTIERREZ, Auteur ; Evelyn SHAW, Auteur ; Laurie SPERRY, Auteur ; Michael ALESSANDRI, Auteur ; Samuel L. ODOM, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.1430-1440. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 5-4 (October-December 2011) . - p.1430-1440 Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder  Comprehensive treatment models  Treatment implementation  Treatment integrity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Treatment implementation is an under-studied and under-reported aspect of intervention studies involving individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One primary area of concern is the lack of reliable and valid implementation measures, which allows a conclusive association to be drawn between the intervention and participant outcomes. This study examined the psychometric properties of two implementation measures developed for comprehensive treatment models serving preschoolers with ASD (i.e., LEAP and TEACCH). Both of the measures were completed in classrooms using LEAP or TEACCH instructional approaches as well as in classrooms in which a business-as-usual or non-model specific treatment approach was used. Across four months of one school year, a maximum of 4 observations were conducted in each of the 34 classrooms involved in the study. Results indicated that both implementation tools are reliable and valid, and that particular subscales of these measures allowed for discrimination of the three types of classrooms from each other. This step of psychometrically validating implementation measures as part of conducting efficacy studies may yield more robust associations between implementation and intervention effects. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=125

Assessing Quality of Program Environments for Children and Youth with Autism: Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS) / Samuel L. ODOM in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48-3 (March 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-3 (March 2018) . - p.913-924 Titre : Assessing Quality of Program Environments for Children and Youth with Autism: Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Samuel L. ODOM, Auteur ; Ann COX, Auteur ; John SIDERIS, Auteur ; Kara HUME, Auteur ; Susan H. HEDGES, Auteur ; Suzanne KUCHARCZYK, Auteur ; Evelyn SHAW, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur ; Stephanie S. RESZKA, Auteur ; Jennifer NEITZEL, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p.913-924 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Psychometrics  Quality  Rating scale Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS), an instrument designed to assess quality of program environments for students with autism spectrum disorder. Data sets from two samples of public school programs that provided services to children and youth with autism spectrum disorder were utilized. Cronbach alpha analyses indicated high coefficients of internal consistency for the total APERS and moderate levels for item domains for the first data set, which was replicated with the second data set. A factor analysis of the first data set indicated that all domain scores loaded on one main factor, in alignment with the conceptual model, with this finding being replicated in the second data set. Also, the APERS was sensitive to changes resulting from a professional development program designed to promote program quality. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3379-7 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=339 [article] Assessing Quality of Program Environments for Children and Youth with Autism: Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS) [texte imprimé] / Samuel L. ODOM, Auteur ; Ann COX, Auteur ; John SIDERIS, Auteur ; Kara HUME, Auteur ; Susan H. HEDGES, Auteur ; Suzanne KUCHARCZYK, Auteur ; Evelyn SHAW, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur ; Stephanie S. RESZKA, Auteur ; Jennifer NEITZEL, Auteur . - 2018 . - p.913-924. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-3 (March 2018) . - p.913-924 Mots-clés : Autism  Psychometrics  Quality  Rating scale Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS), an instrument designed to assess quality of program environments for students with autism spectrum disorder. Data sets from two samples of public school programs that provided services to children and youth with autism spectrum disorder were utilized. Cronbach alpha analyses indicated high coefficients of internal consistency for the total APERS and moderate levels for item domains for the first data set, which was replicated with the second data set. A factor analysis of the first data set indicated that all domain scores loaded on one main factor, in alignment with the conceptual model, with this finding being replicated in the second data set. Also, the APERS was sensitive to changes resulting from a professional development program designed to promote program quality. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3379-7 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=339

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2) Par page : 25 50 100 200