
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Christian M. CONNELL |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Fathering and mothering in the family system: linking marital hostility and aggression in adopted toddlers / Carla SMITH STOVER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53-4 (April 2012)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Fathering and mothering in the family system: linking marital hostility and aggression in adopted toddlers Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Carla SMITH STOVER, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Laura V. SCARAMELLA, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.401-409 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Marital hostility parentingfathers toddler aggression Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Previous studies have linked marital conflict, parenting, and externalizing problems in early childhood. However, these studies have not examined whether genes account for these links nor have they examined whether contextual factors such as parental personality or financial distress might account for links between marital conflict and parenting. We used an adoption design to allow for a clear examination of environmental impact rather than shared genes of parents and children, and assessments of parental personality and financial strain to assess the effects of context on relationships between marriage and parenting of both mothers and fathers. Method: Participants were 308 adoption-linked families comprised of an adopted child, her/his biological mother (BM), adoptive mother (AM) and adoptive father (AF). BMs were assessed 3–6 and 18 months postpartum and adoptive families were assessed when the child was 18 and 27 months old. Structural equations models were used to examine associations between marital hostility, fathers’ and mothers’ parenting hostility, and child aggressive behavior at 27 months of age. In addition, the contribution of financial strain and adoptive parent personality traits was examined to determine the associations with the spillover of marital hostility to hostile parenting. Results: A hostile marital relationship was significantly associated with hostile parenting in fathers and mothers, which were associated with aggressive behavior in toddlers. Subjective financial strain was uniquely associated with marital hostility and child aggression. Antisocial personality traits were related to a more hostile/conflicted marital relationship and to hostile parenting. Conclusions: Results clarify mechanisms that may account for the success of early parent–child prevention programs that include a focus on parental economic strain and personality in addition to parent training. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02510.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=152
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-4 (April 2012) . - p.401-409[article] Fathering and mothering in the family system: linking marital hostility and aggression in adopted toddlers [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Carla SMITH STOVER, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Laura V. SCARAMELLA, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.401-409.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-4 (April 2012) . - p.401-409
Mots-clés : Marital hostility parentingfathers toddler aggression Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Previous studies have linked marital conflict, parenting, and externalizing problems in early childhood. However, these studies have not examined whether genes account for these links nor have they examined whether contextual factors such as parental personality or financial distress might account for links between marital conflict and parenting. We used an adoption design to allow for a clear examination of environmental impact rather than shared genes of parents and children, and assessments of parental personality and financial strain to assess the effects of context on relationships between marriage and parenting of both mothers and fathers. Method: Participants were 308 adoption-linked families comprised of an adopted child, her/his biological mother (BM), adoptive mother (AM) and adoptive father (AF). BMs were assessed 3–6 and 18 months postpartum and adoptive families were assessed when the child was 18 and 27 months old. Structural equations models were used to examine associations between marital hostility, fathers’ and mothers’ parenting hostility, and child aggressive behavior at 27 months of age. In addition, the contribution of financial strain and adoptive parent personality traits was examined to determine the associations with the spillover of marital hostility to hostile parenting. Results: A hostile marital relationship was significantly associated with hostile parenting in fathers and mothers, which were associated with aggressive behavior in toddlers. Subjective financial strain was uniquely associated with marital hostility and child aggression. Antisocial personality traits were related to a more hostile/conflicted marital relationship and to hostile parenting. Conclusions: Results clarify mechanisms that may account for the success of early parent–child prevention programs that include a focus on parental economic strain and personality in addition to parent training. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02510.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=152 Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences / Robyn A. CREE in Development and Psychopathology, 33-4 (October 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Robyn A. CREE, Auteur ; Chang LIU, Auteur ; Ralitza GUEORGUIEVA, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Misaki N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Charles R. BEEKMAN, Auteur ; Megan V. SMITH, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1229-1247 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adoption design differential susceptibility externalizing psychopathology factor social competence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, “plasticity” genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or “sensitivity.” En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000450 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-4 (October 2021) . - p.1229-1247[article] Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Robyn A. CREE, Auteur ; Chang LIU, Auteur ; Ralitza GUEORGUIEVA, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Misaki N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Charles R. BEEKMAN, Auteur ; Megan V. SMITH, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur . - p.1229-1247.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-4 (October 2021) . - p.1229-1247
Mots-clés : adoption design differential susceptibility externalizing psychopathology factor social competence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, “plasticity” genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or “sensitivity.” En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000450 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457