4 recherche sur le mot-clé 'adoption design'

Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences / Robyn A. CREE in Development and Psychopathology, 33-4 (October 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 33-4 (October 2021) . - p.1229-1247 Titre : Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Robyn A. CREE, Auteur ; Chang LIU, Auteur ; Ralitza GUEORGUIEVA, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Misaki N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Charles R. BEEKMAN, Auteur ; Megan V. SMITH, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1229-1247 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adoption design  differential susceptibility  externalizing  psychopathology factor  social competence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, “plasticity” genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or “sensitivity.” En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000450 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457 [article] Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Robyn A. CREE, Auteur ; Chang LIU, Auteur ; Ralitza GUEORGUIEVA, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Misaki N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Charles R. BEEKMAN, Auteur ; Megan V. SMITH, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur . - p.1229-1247. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 33-4 (October 2021) . - p.1229-1247 Mots-clés : adoption design  differential susceptibility  externalizing  psychopathology factor  social competence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, “plasticity” genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or “sensitivity.” En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000450 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457

Associations between parenting characteristics and adolescent substance use: A genetically informed, longitudinal adoption study / Shelley A. GRESKO in Development and Psychopathology, 34-5 (December 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 34-5 (December 2022) . - p.1702-1715 Titre : Associations between parenting characteristics and adolescent substance use: A genetically informed, longitudinal adoption study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Shelley A. GRESKO, Auteur ; Maya RIESELBACH, Auteur ; Robin P. CORLEY, Auteur ; Chandra A. REYNOLDS, Auteur ; Soo Hyun RHEE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1702-1715 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescent substance use  adoption design  longitudinal study  parenting  parent–child relationship quality Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The present study examined putative environmental predictors of adolescent substance use, using a prospective adoption design to distinguish between environmental mediation (i.e., parenting influencing adolescent substance use), passive gene “environment correlation (i.e., parental genetic predisposition influencing the association between parenting characteristics and adolescent substance use), and evocative gene “environment correlation (i.e., children’s genetic predisposition influencing parenting). Longitudinal data from the Colorado Adoption Project (395 adoptees, 491 nonadoptees, 485 adoptive parents, and 490 biological parents) were examined. Children (48% girls) were assessed at ages 1 to 17 years. Over 90% of the sample were non-Hispanic White. Associations between parenting and adolescent substance use were compared between adoptive and nonadoptive families. Positive, negative, and inconsistent parenting measures in early childhood through adolescence were not consistently associated with adolescent substance use, with only 6% of correlations being statistically significant (r = â’0.152 to .207). However, parent “child relationship quality assessed from childhood to adolescence and orientation to parents assessed during adolescence were significantly, negatively associated with adolescent substance use, with 71% of correlations being statistically significant (r = â’0.88 to â’0.11). There was little evidence of sex differences in the associations. Environmental mediation, rather than passive or evocative gene “environment correlation, explained most associations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000748 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=491 [article] Associations between parenting characteristics and adolescent substance use: A genetically informed, longitudinal adoption study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Shelley A. GRESKO, Auteur ; Maya RIESELBACH, Auteur ; Robin P. CORLEY, Auteur ; Chandra A. REYNOLDS, Auteur ; Soo Hyun RHEE, Auteur . - p.1702-1715. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 34-5 (December 2022) . - p.1702-1715 Mots-clés : adolescent substance use  adoption design  longitudinal study  parenting  parent–child relationship quality Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The present study examined putative environmental predictors of adolescent substance use, using a prospective adoption design to distinguish between environmental mediation (i.e., parenting influencing adolescent substance use), passive gene “environment correlation (i.e., parental genetic predisposition influencing the association between parenting characteristics and adolescent substance use), and evocative gene “environment correlation (i.e., children’s genetic predisposition influencing parenting). Longitudinal data from the Colorado Adoption Project (395 adoptees, 491 nonadoptees, 485 adoptive parents, and 490 biological parents) were examined. Children (48% girls) were assessed at ages 1 to 17 years. Over 90% of the sample were non-Hispanic White. Associations between parenting and adolescent substance use were compared between adoptive and nonadoptive families. Positive, negative, and inconsistent parenting measures in early childhood through adolescence were not consistently associated with adolescent substance use, with only 6% of correlations being statistically significant (r = â’0.152 to .207). However, parent “child relationship quality assessed from childhood to adolescence and orientation to parents assessed during adolescence were significantly, negatively associated with adolescent substance use, with 71% of correlations being statistically significant (r = â’0.88 to â’0.11). There was little evidence of sex differences in the associations. Environmental mediation, rather than passive or evocative gene “environment correlation, explained most associations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000748 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=491

Longitudinal examination of pathways to peer problems in middle childhood: A siblings-reared-apart design / L. D. LEVE in Development and Psychopathology, 31-5 (December 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 31-5 (December 2019) . - p.1633-1647 Titre : Longitudinal examination of pathways to peer problems in middle childhood: A siblings-reared-apart design Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : L. D. LEVE, Auteur ; A. M. GRIFFIN, Auteur ; M. N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; G. T. HAROLD, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; J. M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; D. S. SHAW, Auteur ; D. REISS, Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p.1633-1647 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adoption design  inhibitory control  parental hostility  peer problems  siblings Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : To advance research from Dishion and others on associations between parenting and peer problems across childhood, we used a sample of 177 sibling pairs reared apart since birth (because of adoption of one of the siblings) to examine associations between parental hostility and children's peer problems when children were ages 7 and 9.5 years (n = 329 children). We extended conventional cross-lagged parent-peer models by incorporating child inhibitory control as an additional predictor and examining genetic contributions via birth mother psychopathology. Path models indicated a cross-lagged association from parental hostility to later peer problems. When child inhibitory control was included, birth mother internalizing symptoms were associated with poorer child inhibitory control, which was associated with more parental hostility and peer problems. The cross-lagged paths from parental hostility to peer problems were no longer significant in the full model. Multigroup analyses revealed that the path from birth mother internalizing symptoms to child inhibitory control was significantly higher for birth parent-reared children, indicating the possible contribution of passive gene-environment correlation to this association. Exploratory analyses suggested that each child's unique rearing context contributed to his or her inhibitory control and peer behavior. Implications for the development of evidence-based interventions are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000890 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=412 [article] Longitudinal examination of pathways to peer problems in middle childhood: A siblings-reared-apart design [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / L. D. LEVE, Auteur ; A. M. GRIFFIN, Auteur ; M. N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; G. T. HAROLD, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; J. M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; D. S. SHAW, Auteur ; D. REISS, Auteur . - 2019 . - p.1633-1647. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 31-5 (December 2019) . - p.1633-1647 Mots-clés : adoption design  inhibitory control  parental hostility  peer problems  siblings Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : To advance research from Dishion and others on associations between parenting and peer problems across childhood, we used a sample of 177 sibling pairs reared apart since birth (because of adoption of one of the siblings) to examine associations between parental hostility and children's peer problems when children were ages 7 and 9.5 years (n = 329 children). We extended conventional cross-lagged parent-peer models by incorporating child inhibitory control as an additional predictor and examining genetic contributions via birth mother psychopathology. Path models indicated a cross-lagged association from parental hostility to later peer problems. When child inhibitory control was included, birth mother internalizing symptoms were associated with poorer child inhibitory control, which was associated with more parental hostility and peer problems. The cross-lagged paths from parental hostility to peer problems were no longer significant in the full model. Multigroup analyses revealed that the path from birth mother internalizing symptoms to child inhibitory control was significantly higher for birth parent-reared children, indicating the possible contribution of passive gene-environment correlation to this association. Exploratory analyses suggested that each child's unique rearing context contributed to his or her inhibitory control and peer behavior. Implications for the development of evidence-based interventions are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000890 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=412

Confirming the etiology of adolescent acting-out behaviors: an examination of observer-ratings in a sample of adoptive and biological siblings / S. Alexandra BURT in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52-5 (May 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-5 (May 2011) . - p.519-526 Titre : Confirming the etiology of adolescent acting-out behaviors: an examination of observer-ratings in a sample of adoptive and biological siblings Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur ; Ashlea M. KLAHR, Auteur ; Martha A. RUETER, Auteur ; Matt MCGUE, Auteur ; William G. IACONO, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.519-526 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Shared environment  antisocial behavior  adoption design  observer-ratings Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:  A recent meta-analysis revealed moderate shared environmental influences (C) on most forms of child and adolescent psychopathology (Burt, 2009), including antisocial behavior. Critically, however, the research analyzed in this meta-analysis relied largely on specific informant-reports (and particularly parent and child reports), each of which is subject to various sources of rater bias. Observer-ratings of children’s behaviors avoid many of these biases, and are thus well suited to verify the presence of C. Given this, we sought to buttress the evidence supporting C in two key ways. First, we sought to confirm that C contributes to observer-ratings in a sample of adoptive siblings, as similarity between adoptive siblings constitutes a ‘direct’ estimate of C. Second, we sought to confirm that these shared environmental influences persist across informants (i.e., the effects are not specific to the rater or the context in question). Methods:  The current study examined the etiology of observer-ratings of acting-out behaviors, as well as sources of etiological overlap across observer-ratings, adolescent self-report and maternal-report in sample of over 600 biological and adoptive sibling pairs from the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS). Results:  Results revealed moderate and significant shared environmental influences on observer-ratings (31%), as well as on the other informant-reports (20–23%). Moreover, a portion of these effects overlapped across measures (C correlations ranged from .32 to .34). Conclusions:  Such findings argue against passive gene–environment correlations (rGE) and rater bias as primary explanations for earlier findings of C on antisocial behavior, and in this way, offer a critical extension of prior work indicating that the role of shared environmental influences on child and adolescent antisocial behavior was dismissed too soon. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02334.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=121 [article] Confirming the etiology of adolescent acting-out behaviors: an examination of observer-ratings in a sample of adoptive and biological siblings [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur ; Ashlea M. KLAHR, Auteur ; Martha A. RUETER, Auteur ; Matt MCGUE, Auteur ; William G. IACONO, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.519-526. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-5 (May 2011) . - p.519-526 Mots-clés : Shared environment  antisocial behavior  adoption design  observer-ratings Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:  A recent meta-analysis revealed moderate shared environmental influences (C) on most forms of child and adolescent psychopathology (Burt, 2009), including antisocial behavior. Critically, however, the research analyzed in this meta-analysis relied largely on specific informant-reports (and particularly parent and child reports), each of which is subject to various sources of rater bias. Observer-ratings of children’s behaviors avoid many of these biases, and are thus well suited to verify the presence of C. Given this, we sought to buttress the evidence supporting C in two key ways. First, we sought to confirm that C contributes to observer-ratings in a sample of adoptive siblings, as similarity between adoptive siblings constitutes a ‘direct’ estimate of C. Second, we sought to confirm that these shared environmental influences persist across informants (i.e., the effects are not specific to the rater or the context in question). Methods:  The current study examined the etiology of observer-ratings of acting-out behaviors, as well as sources of etiological overlap across observer-ratings, adolescent self-report and maternal-report in sample of over 600 biological and adoptive sibling pairs from the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS). Results:  Results revealed moderate and significant shared environmental influences on observer-ratings (31%), as well as on the other informant-reports (20–23%). Moreover, a portion of these effects overlapped across measures (C correlations ranged from .32 to .34). Conclusions:  Such findings argue against passive gene–environment correlations (rGE) and rater bias as primary explanations for earlier findings of C on antisocial behavior, and in this way, offer a critical extension of prior work indicating that the role of shared environmental influences on child and adolescent antisocial behavior was dismissed too soon. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02334.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=121