The role of interstimulus interval and “Stimulus-type” in prepotent response inhibition abilities in people with ASD: A quantitative and qualitative review / Marieke W. M. KUIPER in Autism Research, 9-11 (November 2016)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism Research > 9-11 (November 2016) . - p.1124-1141 Titre : The role of interstimulus interval and “Stimulus-type” in prepotent response inhibition abilities in people with ASD: A quantitative and qualitative review Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Marieke W. M. KUIPER, Auteur ; Elisabeth W. M. VERHOEVEN, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1124-1141 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorders  autism  prepotent response inhibition  interstimulus interval  cognitive control  meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with prepotent response inhibition difficulties. However, the large variation between studies suggests that understudied factors, such as interstimulus interval (ISI) and “stimulus-type” (both hypothesized proxies of stressors influencing arousal), might influence the inhibitory abilities of people with ASD. Using meta-analysis, we tested whether differences in prepotent response inhibition between people with and without ASD was influenced by ISI. There was not enough variation in “stimulus-type” between the studies to include it as a moderator. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 950 people with ASD and 966 typically developing controls. Additionally, a qualitative review including studies comparing a neutral and an arousing condition in one experiment was performed to examine whether fast ISI or specific arousing stimuli directly influence prepotent response inhibition. The meta-analysis indicated that ISI was not a relevant moderator. The qualitative review showed that ISI and “stimulus-type” had the same effect for both groups. Although all studies regarding ISI indicated that fast ISI worsened performance, different types of stimuli had either a positive or a negative influence. This could suggest that distinctive stimuli might affect arousal differently. While we replicated the inhibition difficulties in people with ASD (g = .51), our results do not show strong ASD-specific effects of ISI or “stimulus-type” on inhibition. Nonetheless, ISI and “stimulus-type” do seem to influence performance. Future research focusing on potential underlying factors (e.g., baseline physiological arousal) is needed to examine why this is the case. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.1631 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=297 [article] The role of interstimulus interval and “Stimulus-type” in prepotent response inhibition abilities in people with ASD: A quantitative and qualitative review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Marieke W. M. KUIPER, Auteur ; Elisabeth W. M. VERHOEVEN, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur . - p.1124-1141. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism Research > 9-11 (November 2016) . - p.1124-1141 Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorders  autism  prepotent response inhibition  interstimulus interval  cognitive control  meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with prepotent response inhibition difficulties. However, the large variation between studies suggests that understudied factors, such as interstimulus interval (ISI) and “stimulus-type” (both hypothesized proxies of stressors influencing arousal), might influence the inhibitory abilities of people with ASD. Using meta-analysis, we tested whether differences in prepotent response inhibition between people with and without ASD was influenced by ISI. There was not enough variation in “stimulus-type” between the studies to include it as a moderator. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 950 people with ASD and 966 typically developing controls. Additionally, a qualitative review including studies comparing a neutral and an arousing condition in one experiment was performed to examine whether fast ISI or specific arousing stimuli directly influence prepotent response inhibition. The meta-analysis indicated that ISI was not a relevant moderator. The qualitative review showed that ISI and “stimulus-type” had the same effect for both groups. Although all studies regarding ISI indicated that fast ISI worsened performance, different types of stimuli had either a positive or a negative influence. This could suggest that distinctive stimuli might affect arousal differently. While we replicated the inhibition difficulties in people with ASD (g = .51), our results do not show strong ASD-specific effects of ISI or “stimulus-type” on inhibition. Nonetheless, ISI and “stimulus-type” do seem to influence performance. Future research focusing on potential underlying factors (e.g., baseline physiological arousal) is needed to examine why this is the case. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.1631 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=297

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)