Accelerating research on treatment and services for transition age youth and adults on the autism spectrum / Mary BAKER-ERICZEN in Autism, 22-1 (January 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 22-1 (January 2018) . - p.2-5 Titre : Accelerating research on treatment and services for transition age youth and adults on the autism spectrum Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Lauren BROOKMAN-FRAZEE, Auteur ; Edward S. BRODKIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2-5 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317738646 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=334 [article] Accelerating research on treatment and services for transition age youth and adults on the autism spectrum [texte imprimé] / Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Lauren BROOKMAN-FRAZEE, Auteur ; Edward S. BRODKIN, Auteur . - p.2-5. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 22-1 (January 2018) . - p.2-5 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317738646 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=334

Addressing Common Problems in Autism Research: Cohort Development and Sample Description for a Participatory, Real-World, Longitudinal Study of Outcomes in Autistic Adults / Christina NICOLAIDIS in Autism, 30-10 (October 2026)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 30-10 (October 2026) . - p.2628-2647 Titre : Addressing Common Problems in Autism Research: Cohort Development and Sample Description for a Participatory, Real-World, Longitudinal Study of Outcomes in Autistic Adults Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Christina NICOLAIDIS, Auteur ; Ian MOURA, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Mirah SCHARER, Auteur ; Joelle MASLAK, Auteur ; Rachel KRIPKE-LUDWIG, Auteur ; Willi HORNER-JOHNSON, Auteur ; Julia LOVE, Auteur ; Dora M. RAYMAKER, Auteur ; Andrea JOYCE, Auteur ; Shannon DES ROCHES ROSA, Auteur ; Grace A. HERBERT, Auteur ; Julie Lounds TAYLOR, Auteur ; Liu-Qin YANG, Auteur ; Katherine MCDONALD, Auteur ; Zack SIDDEEK, Auteur ; Steven K. KAPP, Auteur ; Emanuel FROWNER, Auteur ; Ivanova SMITH, Auteur ; Anna Furra WALLINGTON, Auteur ; K.J. FLORES, Auteur ; Noah KAUFMAN, Auteur ; Clarissa KRIPKE, Auteur ; Joseph VERA, Auteur ; Vivian D. GRILLO, Auteur ; Finn GARDINER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2628-2647 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adults  populations  outcome measurement  methods  community based participatory research  participatory methods  longitudinal research  health services  contexts Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Adult autism services research is plagued by methodological challenges, including difficulty obtaining representative or heterogeneous samples and a frequent mismatch between experimental methodologies and real-world settings. The Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education (AASPIRE) Outcomes Project used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to (a) create the AASPIRE Measurement Toolkit – a set of self- and caregiver-reported accessible outcome measures to evaluate health and social services and (b) explore factors predicting changes in outcomes. We previously used a CBPR-nested Delphi process to identify high-priority outcomes and adapted or created instruments to measure them. We conducted a longitudinal survey to validate these measures in a pragmatic sample of autistic adults with subcohorts from two health care systems, two disability service systems, and the larger autistic community in the United States. This article (a) describes our study methods and the sample’s baseline characteristics and (b) compares characteristics among participants in the separate subcohorts and sites. We collected baseline data from 870 participants. Follow-up response rates were >80% for the second and third time points. The sample includes strong heterogeneity. As expected, sample characteristics differed markedly between the three subcohorts. Lessons from our experience may help other researchers devise strategies to effectively recruit heterogeneous samples of autistic adults across various settings.Lay Abstract There are many challenges that can get in the way of doing good research on autism in adulthood. Examples of these types of challenges include the following: (a) it can be hard to include autistic people with a wide range of characteristics in research studies and (b) traditional research may come up with results that do not really apply to people in the real world. Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education (AASPIRE) is a group of academics and autistic community members who work together as equal partners. We are creating the AASPIRE Measurement Toolkit, an accessible set of survey measures about the health and life outcomes most important to autistic adults. In an earlier part of the project, we worked together to create the measures in the Toolkit. Now we are doing a big survey study to test the new measures and look at what predicts changes in outcomes over time. This article describes our study methods and the characteristics of the people in the sample. It also compares basic information about people recruited to the study from different places, using different methods. We recruited 870 autistic adults from two health care centers (the health care subgroup); two disability services systems (the disability subgroup); and the broader autistic community. We collected data from each person three times over 12 to 18 months. Over 80% of study participants did the follow-up surveys. People in the study had a wide range of personal and disability-related characteristics. As we predicted, the three subgroups were really different from each other. Even the two sites within the subgroups were a bit different. This serves as a warning to researchers: results that come from people recruited from one setting may not apply to people in other settings. It also shows how using multiple different strategies at the same time can increase the diversity in study samples. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613261476381 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=593 [article] Addressing Common Problems in Autism Research: Cohort Development and Sample Description for a Participatory, Real-World, Longitudinal Study of Outcomes in Autistic Adults [texte imprimé] / Christina NICOLAIDIS, Auteur ; Ian MOURA, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Mirah SCHARER, Auteur ; Joelle MASLAK, Auteur ; Rachel KRIPKE-LUDWIG, Auteur ; Willi HORNER-JOHNSON, Auteur ; Julia LOVE, Auteur ; Dora M. RAYMAKER, Auteur ; Andrea JOYCE, Auteur ; Shannon DES ROCHES ROSA, Auteur ; Grace A. HERBERT, Auteur ; Julie Lounds TAYLOR, Auteur ; Liu-Qin YANG, Auteur ; Katherine MCDONALD, Auteur ; Zack SIDDEEK, Auteur ; Steven K. KAPP, Auteur ; Emanuel FROWNER, Auteur ; Ivanova SMITH, Auteur ; Anna Furra WALLINGTON, Auteur ; K.J. FLORES, Auteur ; Noah KAUFMAN, Auteur ; Clarissa KRIPKE, Auteur ; Joseph VERA, Auteur ; Vivian D. GRILLO, Auteur ; Finn GARDINER, Auteur . - p.2628-2647. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 30-10 (October 2026) . - p.2628-2647 Mots-clés : adults  populations  outcome measurement  methods  community based participatory research  participatory methods  longitudinal research  health services  contexts Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Adult autism services research is plagued by methodological challenges, including difficulty obtaining representative or heterogeneous samples and a frequent mismatch between experimental methodologies and real-world settings. The Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education (AASPIRE) Outcomes Project used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to (a) create the AASPIRE Measurement Toolkit – a set of self- and caregiver-reported accessible outcome measures to evaluate health and social services and (b) explore factors predicting changes in outcomes. We previously used a CBPR-nested Delphi process to identify high-priority outcomes and adapted or created instruments to measure them. We conducted a longitudinal survey to validate these measures in a pragmatic sample of autistic adults with subcohorts from two health care systems, two disability service systems, and the larger autistic community in the United States. This article (a) describes our study methods and the sample’s baseline characteristics and (b) compares characteristics among participants in the separate subcohorts and sites. We collected baseline data from 870 participants. Follow-up response rates were >80% for the second and third time points. The sample includes strong heterogeneity. As expected, sample characteristics differed markedly between the three subcohorts. Lessons from our experience may help other researchers devise strategies to effectively recruit heterogeneous samples of autistic adults across various settings.Lay Abstract There are many challenges that can get in the way of doing good research on autism in adulthood. Examples of these types of challenges include the following: (a) it can be hard to include autistic people with a wide range of characteristics in research studies and (b) traditional research may come up with results that do not really apply to people in the real world. Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education (AASPIRE) is a group of academics and autistic community members who work together as equal partners. We are creating the AASPIRE Measurement Toolkit, an accessible set of survey measures about the health and life outcomes most important to autistic adults. In an earlier part of the project, we worked together to create the measures in the Toolkit. Now we are doing a big survey study to test the new measures and look at what predicts changes in outcomes over time. This article describes our study methods and the characteristics of the people in the sample. It also compares basic information about people recruited to the study from different places, using different methods. We recruited 870 autistic adults from two health care centers (the health care subgroup); two disability services systems (the disability subgroup); and the broader autistic community. We collected data from each person three times over 12 to 18 months. Over 80% of study participants did the follow-up surveys. People in the study had a wide range of personal and disability-related characteristics. As we predicted, the three subgroups were really different from each other. Even the two sites within the subgroups were a bit different. This serves as a warning to researchers: results that come from people recruited from one setting may not apply to people in other settings. It also shows how using multiple different strategies at the same time can increase the diversity in study samples. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613261476381 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=593

Characterizing psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder receiving publicly funded mental health services / Lauren BROOKMAN-FRAZEE in Autism, 22-8 (November 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 22-8 (November 2018) . - p.938-952 Titre : Characterizing psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder receiving publicly funded mental health services Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lauren BROOKMAN-FRAZEE, Auteur ; Nicole STADNICK, Auteur ; Colby CHLEBOWSKI, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; William GANGER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.938-952 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder  challenging behaviors  children's mental health services  comorbidity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Publicly funded mental health programs play a significant role in serving children with autism spectrum disorder. Understanding patterns of psychiatric comorbidity for this population within mental health settings is important to implement appropriately tailored interventions. This study (1) describes patterns of psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder who present to mental health services with challenging behaviors and (2) identifies child characteristics associated with comorbid conditions. Data are drawn from baseline assessments from 201 children with autism spectrum disorder who participated in a community effectiveness trial across 29 publicly funded mental health programs. Non-autism spectrum disorder diagnoses were assessed using an adapted Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, parent version. Approximately 92% of children met criteria for at least one non-autism spectrum disorder diagnosis (78% attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 58% oppositional defiant disorder, 56% anxiety, 30% mood). Logistic regression indicated that child gender and clinical characteristics were differentially associated with meeting criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, an anxiety, or a mood disorder. Exploratory analyses supported a link between challenging behaviors and mood disorder symptoms and revealed high prevalence of these symptoms in this autism spectrum disorder population. Findings provide direction for tailoring intervention to address a broad range of clinical issues for youth with autism spectrum disorder served in mental health settings. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361317712650 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=370 [article] Characterizing psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder receiving publicly funded mental health services [texte imprimé] / Lauren BROOKMAN-FRAZEE, Auteur ; Nicole STADNICK, Auteur ; Colby CHLEBOWSKI, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; William GANGER, Auteur . - p.938-952. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 22-8 (November 2018) . - p.938-952 Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder  challenging behaviors  children's mental health services  comorbidity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Publicly funded mental health programs play a significant role in serving children with autism spectrum disorder. Understanding patterns of psychiatric comorbidity for this population within mental health settings is important to implement appropriately tailored interventions. This study (1) describes patterns of psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder who present to mental health services with challenging behaviors and (2) identifies child characteristics associated with comorbid conditions. Data are drawn from baseline assessments from 201 children with autism spectrum disorder who participated in a community effectiveness trial across 29 publicly funded mental health programs. Non-autism spectrum disorder diagnoses were assessed using an adapted Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, parent version. Approximately 92% of children met criteria for at least one non-autism spectrum disorder diagnosis (78% attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 58% oppositional defiant disorder, 56% anxiety, 30% mood). Logistic regression indicated that child gender and clinical characteristics were differentially associated with meeting criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, an anxiety, or a mood disorder. Exploratory analyses supported a link between challenging behaviors and mood disorder symptoms and revealed high prevalence of these symptoms in this autism spectrum disorder population. Findings provide direction for tailoring intervention to address a broad range of clinical issues for youth with autism spectrum disorder served in mental health settings. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361317712650 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=370

Consensus on high-priority outcomes to be used in the evaluation of services for autistic adults: Results from a "CBPR-Nested Delphi Process" / Christina NICOLAIDIS in Autism, 29-8 (August 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 29-8 (August 2025) . - p.1959-1972 Titre : Consensus on high-priority outcomes to be used in the evaluation of services for autistic adults: Results from a "CBPR-Nested Delphi Process" Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Christina NICOLAIDIS, Auteur ; Mirah SCHARER, Auteur ; Dora M. RAYMAKER, Auteur ; Joseph VERA, Auteur ; Todd EDWARDS, Auteur ; Ian MOURA, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Joelle MASLAK, Auteur ; Liu-Qin YANG, Auteur ; Rachel KRIPKE-LUDWIG, Auteur ; Steven K. KAPP, Auteur ; Andrea JOYCE, Auteur ; Anna WALLINGTON, Auteur ; null NULL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1959-1972 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autistic adults  Delphi method  community-based participatory research  patient-reported outcome measures Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : People are increasingly recognizing the need for service interventions to improve the lives of autistic adults. However, less is known about how to best evaluate such services. We aimed to identify (1) which self-reported outcomes are most important to measure when evaluating the effectiveness of services for autistic adults and (2) what survey instruments would be needed to measure them. We nested a traditional researcher-driven "Delphi process" within our community-based participatory research approach in what we are calling a "CBPR-Nested Delphi Process." The process allowed us to reach a full consensus among 53 experts with professional and lived experience as autistic adults, family members, health and disability service providers, autism community leaders, and researchers. The final list of outcomes included quality of life, overall health, emotional wellbeing, anxiety, depression, suicidality, autistic burnout, social support, employment satisfaction, community participation, self-determination, access to communication, activities of daily living, satisfaction with social services, and satisfaction with healthcare services. Experts felt almost all available instruments to measure these outcomes would need adaptations to be used with autistic adults (or proxies). Researchers and service providers should consider targeting interventions to these measurable outcomes and evaluating them using instruments that have been co-developed with autistic adults.Lay abstract Why was this project done?People are starting to recognize the need for services to improve the lives of autistic adults. But less is known about how to best evaluate such services.What were the goals of the project?To identify (1) which outcomes are most important to measure when evaluating the effectiveness of services for autistic adults and (2) how we can successfully measure them using surveys.What did the researchers do?We used a method called a "Delphi process" that gets input from lots of different experts. We used that method inside our own long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) process so that we could share power between the academic and community members of our team. We reached a full consensus (agreement) among 53 experts. These experts had professional and/or lived experience as autistic adults, family members, health and disability service providers, autism community leaders, and researchers.What does this study add?The final list of outcomes included quality of life, overall health, emotional wellbeing, anxiety, depression, suicidality, autistic burnout, social support, employment satisfaction, community participation, self-determination, access to communication, activities of daily living, satisfaction with social services, and satisfaction with healthcare services. Experts felt almost all available surveys that try to measure these outcomes would need adaptations to be used with autistic adults (or if needed, with their caregivers).What are the implications?Researchers and service providers should consider targeting services to these outcomes. They should evaluate the effectiveness of services using surveys that have been created with and for autistic adults. En ligne : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13623613251322082 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=564 [article] Consensus on high-priority outcomes to be used in the evaluation of services for autistic adults: Results from a "CBPR-Nested Delphi Process" [texte imprimé] / Christina NICOLAIDIS, Auteur ; Mirah SCHARER, Auteur ; Dora M. RAYMAKER, Auteur ; Joseph VERA, Auteur ; Todd EDWARDS, Auteur ; Ian MOURA, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Joelle MASLAK, Auteur ; Liu-Qin YANG, Auteur ; Rachel KRIPKE-LUDWIG, Auteur ; Steven K. KAPP, Auteur ; Andrea JOYCE, Auteur ; Anna WALLINGTON, Auteur ; null NULL, Auteur . - p.1959-1972. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 29-8 (August 2025) . - p.1959-1972 Mots-clés : autistic adults  Delphi method  community-based participatory research  patient-reported outcome measures Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : People are increasingly recognizing the need for service interventions to improve the lives of autistic adults. However, less is known about how to best evaluate such services. We aimed to identify (1) which self-reported outcomes are most important to measure when evaluating the effectiveness of services for autistic adults and (2) what survey instruments would be needed to measure them. We nested a traditional researcher-driven "Delphi process" within our community-based participatory research approach in what we are calling a "CBPR-Nested Delphi Process." The process allowed us to reach a full consensus among 53 experts with professional and lived experience as autistic adults, family members, health and disability service providers, autism community leaders, and researchers. The final list of outcomes included quality of life, overall health, emotional wellbeing, anxiety, depression, suicidality, autistic burnout, social support, employment satisfaction, community participation, self-determination, access to communication, activities of daily living, satisfaction with social services, and satisfaction with healthcare services. Experts felt almost all available instruments to measure these outcomes would need adaptations to be used with autistic adults (or proxies). Researchers and service providers should consider targeting interventions to these measurable outcomes and evaluating them using instruments that have been co-developed with autistic adults.Lay abstract Why was this project done?People are starting to recognize the need for services to improve the lives of autistic adults. But less is known about how to best evaluate such services.What were the goals of the project?To identify (1) which outcomes are most important to measure when evaluating the effectiveness of services for autistic adults and (2) how we can successfully measure them using surveys.What did the researchers do?We used a method called a "Delphi process" that gets input from lots of different experts. We used that method inside our own long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) process so that we could share power between the academic and community members of our team. We reached a full consensus (agreement) among 53 experts. These experts had professional and/or lived experience as autistic adults, family members, health and disability service providers, autism community leaders, and researchers.What does this study add?The final list of outcomes included quality of life, overall health, emotional wellbeing, anxiety, depression, suicidality, autistic burnout, social support, employment satisfaction, community participation, self-determination, access to communication, activities of daily living, satisfaction with social services, and satisfaction with healthcare services. Experts felt almost all available surveys that try to measure these outcomes would need adaptations to be used with autistic adults (or if needed, with their caregivers).What are the implications?Researchers and service providers should consider targeting services to these outcomes. They should evaluate the effectiveness of services using surveys that have been created with and for autistic adults. En ligne : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13623613251322082 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=564

Construct Validity of the Autism Impact Measure (AIM) / Micah O. MAZUREK in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50-7 (July 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-7 (July 2020) . - p.2307-2319 Titre : Construct Validity of the Autism Impact Measure (AIM) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Micah O. MAZUREK, Auteur ; Coleen CARLSON, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Eric BUTTER, Auteur ; Megan NORRIS, Auteur ; Stephen M. KANNE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2307-2319 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Assessment  Autism spectrum disorder  Autism symptoms  Measurement  Psychometrics  Treatment outcome Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Impact Measure (AIM) was designed to track incremental change in frequency and impact of core ASD symptoms. The current study examined the structural and convergent validity of the AIM in a large sample of children with ASD. The results of a series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a final model with five theoretically and empirically meaningful subdomains: Repetitive Behavior, Atypical Behavior, Communication, Social Reciprocity, and Peer Interaction. The final model showed very good fit both overall and for each of the five factors, indicating excellent structural validity. AIM subdomain scores were significantly correlated with measures of similar constructs across all five domains. The results provide further support for the psychometric properties of the AIM. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3462-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=426 [article] Construct Validity of the Autism Impact Measure (AIM) [texte imprimé] / Micah O. MAZUREK, Auteur ; Coleen CARLSON, Auteur ; Mary BAKER-ERICZEN, Auteur ; Eric BUTTER, Auteur ; Megan NORRIS, Auteur ; Stephen M. KANNE, Auteur . - p.2307-2319. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-7 (July 2020) . - p.2307-2319 Mots-clés : Assessment  Autism spectrum disorder  Autism symptoms  Measurement  Psychometrics  Treatment outcome Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Impact Measure (AIM) was designed to track incremental change in frequency and impact of core ASD symptoms. The current study examined the structural and convergent validity of the AIM in a large sample of children with ASD. The results of a series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a final model with five theoretically and empirically meaningful subdomains: Repetitive Behavior, Atypical Behavior, Communication, Social Reciprocity, and Peer Interaction. The final model showed very good fit both overall and for each of the five factors, indicating excellent structural validity. AIM subdomain scores were significantly correlated with measures of similar constructs across all five domains. The results provide further support for the psychometric properties of the AIM. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3462-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=426

Development of the Supported Employment, Comprehensive Cognitive Enhancement, and Social Skills program for adults on the autism spectrum: Results of initial study / Mary BAKER-ERICZEN in Autism, 22-1 (January 2018)  

Permalink

Dissemination and Implementation of Behavioral Treatments for Anxiety in ASD A2 - Kerns, Connor M / Amy DRAHOTA  

Permalink

Early Intervention for Children/Youth with Asperger Syndrome / Mary BAKER-ERICZEN

Permalink

Psychiatric comorbidity in autism spectrum disorder: Correspondence between mental health clinician report and structured parent interview / Nicole STADNICK in Autism, 21-7 (October 2017)  

Permalink

The Autism Impact Measure (AIM): Examination of Sensitivity to Change / Micah O. MAZUREK in Autism Research, 13-11 (November 2020)  

Permalink

The latent structure of the Delis-Kaplan system for autism / Reilly MACDONALD in Autism Research, 17-4 (April 2024)  

Permalink

Using community-engaged methods to adapt virtual reality job-interview training for transition-age youth on the autism spectrum / Matthew J. SMITH in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 71 (March 2020)  

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 12 / 12) Par page : 25 50 100 200