[article] 
inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-5 (May 2019) . - p.1837-1852

Titre :	Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	Ana B. SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, Auteur ; P. GALINDO-VILLARDON, Auteur ; A. B. NIETO-LIBRERO, Auteur ; H. MARTIN-RODERO, Auteur ; Diana L. ROBINS, Auteur
Article en page(s) :	p.1837-1852
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Autism  Hsroc  M-chat  Meta-analysis  Screening tools  Systematic review
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Great efforts focus on early detection of autism spectrum disorder, although some scientists and policy-makers have questioned early universal screening. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different screening tools. Several electronic databases were used to identify published studies. A Bayesian model was used to estimate the screening accuracy. The pooled sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), and the specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analyses to remove heterogeneity indicated sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84), and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99; SD
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03865-2
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393

[article] Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Ana B. SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, Auteur ; P. GALINDO-VILLARDON, Auteur ; A. B. NIETO-LIBRERO, Auteur ; H. MARTIN-RODERO, Auteur ; Diana L. ROBINS, Auteur . - p.1837-1852.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-5 (May 2019) . - p.1837-1852

Mots-clés :	Autism  Hsroc  M-chat  Meta-analysis  Screening tools  Systematic review
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Great efforts focus on early detection of autism spectrum disorder, although some scientists and policy-makers have questioned early universal screening. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different screening tools. Several electronic databases were used to identify published studies. A Bayesian model was used to estimate the screening accuracy. The pooled sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), and the specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analyses to remove heterogeneity indicated sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84), and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99; SD
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03865-2
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393