[article] 
inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 38-7 (August 2008) . - p.1311-1319

Titre :	Development of the Evaluative Method for Evaluating and Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Autism
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	Brian REICHOW, Auteur ; Fred R. VOLKMAR, Auteur ; Domenic V. CICCHETTI, Auteur
Année de publication :	2008
Article en page(s) :	p.1311-1319
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Autism Evidence-based-practice
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Although research in autism has grown more sophisticated, the gap between research knowledge and applicability of research in real world settings has grown. There have been a number of different reviews of evidence-based practices of treatments for young children with autism. Reviews which have critically evaluated the empirical evidence have not found any treatments that can be considered evidence-based. Reasons for this shortcoming are explored, and a new method for the evaluation of empirical evidence is provided. Future uses of this evaluative method are provided as well as a discussion of how this tool might aid in narrowing the research to practice gap.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0517-7
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=536

[article] Development of the Evaluative Method for Evaluating and Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Brian REICHOW, Auteur ; Fred R. VOLKMAR, Auteur ; Domenic V. CICCHETTI, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.1311-1319.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 38-7 (August 2008) . - p.1311-1319

Mots-clés :	Autism Evidence-based-practice
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Although research in autism has grown more sophisticated, the gap between research knowledge and applicability of research in real world settings has grown. There have been a number of different reviews of evidence-based practices of treatments for young children with autism. Reviews which have critically evaluated the empirical evidence have not found any treatments that can be considered evidence-based. Reasons for this shortcoming are explored, and a new method for the evaluation of empirical evidence is provided. Future uses of this evaluative method are provided as well as a discussion of how this tool might aid in narrowing the research to practice gap.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0517-7
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=536