[article]
Titre : |
Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
M. SUNG, Auteur ; T. J. GOH, Auteur ; B. L. J. TAN, Auteur ; J. S. CHAN, Auteur ; H. S. A. LIEW, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.3273-3281 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Autism Spectrum Disorders Dsm-5 Dsm-iv-tr Diagnosis |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Our study examines the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) when applied concurrently against the best estimate clinical diagnoses for 110 children (5.1-19.6 years old) referred for diagnostic assessments of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in a Singaporean outpatient speciality clinic. DSM-IV-TR performed slightly better, yielding sensitivity of 0.946 and specificity of 0.889, compared to DSM-5 (sensitivity = 0.837; specificity = 0.833). When considering the ASD sub-categories, sensitivity ranged from 0.667 to 0.933, and specificity ranged from 0.900 to 0.975. More participants with a PDD-NOS best estimate clinical diagnosis (40%) were misclassified on DSM-5. Merits and weaknesses to both classification systems, and implications for access to services and policy changes are discussed. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3594-x |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369 |
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-10 (October 2018) . - p.3273-3281
[article] Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / M. SUNG, Auteur ; T. J. GOH, Auteur ; B. L. J. TAN, Auteur ; J. S. CHAN, Auteur ; H. S. A. LIEW, Auteur . - p.3273-3281. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-10 (October 2018) . - p.3273-3281
Mots-clés : |
Autism Spectrum Disorders Dsm-5 Dsm-iv-tr Diagnosis |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Our study examines the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) when applied concurrently against the best estimate clinical diagnoses for 110 children (5.1-19.6 years old) referred for diagnostic assessments of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in a Singaporean outpatient speciality clinic. DSM-IV-TR performed slightly better, yielding sensitivity of 0.946 and specificity of 0.889, compared to DSM-5 (sensitivity = 0.837; specificity = 0.833). When considering the ASD sub-categories, sensitivity ranged from 0.667 to 0.933, and specificity ranged from 0.900 to 0.975. More participants with a PDD-NOS best estimate clinical diagnosis (40%) were misclassified on DSM-5. Merits and weaknesses to both classification systems, and implications for access to services and policy changes are discussed. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3594-x |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369 |
|