
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur D. B. MIELE |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)



College Students' Evaluations and Reasoning About Exclusion of Students with Autism and Learning Disability: Context and Goals may Matter More than Contact / Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-1 (January 2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : College Students' Evaluations and Reasoning About Exclusion of Students with Autism and Learning Disability: Context and Goals may Matter More than Contact Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL, Auteur ; S. Y. KIM, Auteur ; D. B. MIELE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.307-323 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Disability Exclusion Learning disability Moral reasoning Social domain theory Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study used mixed-effects logistic regression to examine undergraduates' (N = 142) evaluations and reasoning about scenarios involving disability-based exclusion. Scenarios varied by disability [autism spectrum disorder (ASD) versus learning disability (LD)], the context of exclusion (classroom versus social), and whether or not a grade was at stake. Participants were more likely to determine exclusion was acceptable if the excluded student had an ASD diagnosis, there was a grade at stake, and it occurred in a classroom. Exclusion was less likely to be considered acceptable in the "no grade" compared to the "grade" conditions for LD students, but remained high in both conditions for autistic students. This study also describes contextual variations in participants' justifications for their evaluations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3769-5 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=377
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-1 (January 2019) . - p.307-323[article] College Students' Evaluations and Reasoning About Exclusion of Students with Autism and Learning Disability: Context and Goals may Matter More than Contact [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL, Auteur ; S. Y. KIM, Auteur ; D. B. MIELE, Auteur . - p.307-323.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-1 (January 2019) . - p.307-323
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Disability Exclusion Learning disability Moral reasoning Social domain theory Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study used mixed-effects logistic regression to examine undergraduates' (N = 142) evaluations and reasoning about scenarios involving disability-based exclusion. Scenarios varied by disability [autism spectrum disorder (ASD) versus learning disability (LD)], the context of exclusion (classroom versus social), and whether or not a grade was at stake. Participants were more likely to determine exclusion was acceptable if the excluded student had an ASD diagnosis, there was a grade at stake, and it occurred in a classroom. Exclusion was less likely to be considered acceptable in the "no grade" compared to the "grade" conditions for LD students, but remained high in both conditions for autistic students. This study also describes contextual variations in participants' justifications for their evaluations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3769-5 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=377