
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Barbara J. BURNS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events / Wendy K. SILVERMAN in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37-1 (January-March 2008)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Wendy K. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; Chockalingam VISWESVARAN, Auteur ; Claudio D. ORTIZ, Auteur ; Barbara J. BURNS, Auteur ; David J. KOLKO, Auteur ; Frank W. PUTNAM, Auteur ; Lisa AMAYA-JACKSON, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : p.156-183 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The article reviews the current status (1993-2007) of psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents who have been exposed to traumatic events. Twenty-one treatment studies are evaluated using criteria from Nathan and Gorman (2002) along a continuum of methodological rigor ranging from Type 1 to Type 6. All studies were, at a minimum, robust or fairly rigorous. The treatments in each of these 21 studies also are classified using criteria from Chambless et al. (1996), and Chambless and Hollon (1998). Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy met the well-established criteria; School-Based Group Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment met the criteria for probably efficacious. All the other treatments were classified as either possibly efficacious or experimental. Meta-analytic results for four outcomes (i.e., posttraumatic stress, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and externalizing behavior problems) across all treatments compared to waitlist control and active control conditions combined reveal that, on average, treatments had positive, though modest, effects for all four outcomes. We also cover investigative work on predictors, moderators, and mediators of treatment outcome, as well as the clinical representativeness and generalizability of the studies. The article concludes with a discussion of practice guidelines and future research directions. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410701818293 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=398
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 37-1 (January-March 2008) . - p.156-183[article] Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Wendy K. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; Chockalingam VISWESVARAN, Auteur ; Claudio D. ORTIZ, Auteur ; Barbara J. BURNS, Auteur ; David J. KOLKO, Auteur ; Frank W. PUTNAM, Auteur ; Lisa AMAYA-JACKSON, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.156-183.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 37-1 (January-March 2008) . - p.156-183
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The article reviews the current status (1993-2007) of psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents who have been exposed to traumatic events. Twenty-one treatment studies are evaluated using criteria from Nathan and Gorman (2002) along a continuum of methodological rigor ranging from Type 1 to Type 6. All studies were, at a minimum, robust or fairly rigorous. The treatments in each of these 21 studies also are classified using criteria from Chambless et al. (1996), and Chambless and Hollon (1998). Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy met the well-established criteria; School-Based Group Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment met the criteria for probably efficacious. All the other treatments were classified as either possibly efficacious or experimental. Meta-analytic results for four outcomes (i.e., posttraumatic stress, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and externalizing behavior problems) across all treatments compared to waitlist control and active control conditions combined reveal that, on average, treatments had positive, though modest, effects for all four outcomes. We also cover investigative work on predictors, moderators, and mediators of treatment outcome, as well as the clinical representativeness and generalizability of the studies. The article concludes with a discussion of practice guidelines and future research directions. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410701818293 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=398 Service Use and Costs of Care for Depressed Adolescents: Who Uses and Who Pays? / Marisa Elena DOMINO in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38-6 (November-December 2009)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Service Use and Costs of Care for Depressed Adolescents: Who Uses and Who Pays? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Marisa Elena DOMINO, Auteur ; John S. MARCH, Auteur ; Jeremy MARIO, Auteur ; Michele ROBINS, Auteur ; Diane E. MAY, Auteur ; Elizabeth B. WELLER, Auteur ; Christopher J. KRATOCHVIL, Auteur ; Norah C. FEENY, Auteur ; Susan G. SILVA, Auteur ; Mark A. REINECKE, Auteur ; Barbara J. BURNS, Auteur ; Benedetto VITIELLO, Auteur ; Mary J. HALLIN, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : p.826-836 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Major depressive disorder is common in adolescence and is associated with significant morbidity and family burden. Little is known about service use by depressed adolescents. The purpose of this article is to report the patterns of services use and costs for participants in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study sample during the 3 months before randomization. Costs were assigned across three categories of payors: families, private insurance, and the public sector. We examined whether costs from payors varied by baseline covariates, such as age, gender, insurance status, and family income. The majority (71%) of depressed youth sought services during the 3-month period. Slightly more than one-fifth had contact with a behavioral health specialist. The average participant had just under $300 (SD = $437.67, range = $0-$3,747.71) in treatment-related costs, with most of these costs borne by families and private insurers. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410903259023 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=881
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 38-6 (November-December 2009) . - p.826-836[article] Service Use and Costs of Care for Depressed Adolescents: Who Uses and Who Pays? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Marisa Elena DOMINO, Auteur ; John S. MARCH, Auteur ; Jeremy MARIO, Auteur ; Michele ROBINS, Auteur ; Diane E. MAY, Auteur ; Elizabeth B. WELLER, Auteur ; Christopher J. KRATOCHVIL, Auteur ; Norah C. FEENY, Auteur ; Susan G. SILVA, Auteur ; Mark A. REINECKE, Auteur ; Barbara J. BURNS, Auteur ; Benedetto VITIELLO, Auteur ; Mary J. HALLIN, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.826-836.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 38-6 (November-December 2009) . - p.826-836
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Major depressive disorder is common in adolescence and is associated with significant morbidity and family burden. Little is known about service use by depressed adolescents. The purpose of this article is to report the patterns of services use and costs for participants in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study sample during the 3 months before randomization. Costs were assigned across three categories of payors: families, private insurance, and the public sector. We examined whether costs from payors varied by baseline covariates, such as age, gender, insurance status, and family income. The majority (71%) of depressed youth sought services during the 3-month period. Slightly more than one-fifth had contact with a behavioral health specialist. The average participant had just under $300 (SD = $437.67, range = $0-$3,747.71) in treatment-related costs, with most of these costs borne by families and private insurers. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410903259023 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=881