Age-related differences in affective control and its association with mental health difficulties / Susanne SCHWEIZER in Development and Psychopathology, 32-1 (February 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.329-341 Titre : Age-related differences in affective control and its association with mental health difficulties Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur ; Jenna PARKER, Auteur ; Jovita T. LEUNG, Auteur ; Cáit GRIFFIN, Auteur ; Sarah-Jayne BLAKEMORE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.329-341 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescence  affective control  emotion regulation  executive function  mental health Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Difficulties in regulating affect are core characteristics of a wide range of mental health conditions and are associated with deficits in cognitive control, particularly in affective contexts, affective control. The current study explored how affective control relates to mental health over the course of adolescence. We developed an Affective Control Task, which was administered to young adolescents (11-14 years; n = 29); mid-adolescents (15-18 years; n = 31), and adults (22-30 years; n = 31). The task required individuals to sort cards according to continuously changing rules: color, number, or item type. There was a neutral condition in which items were shapes, and an affective condition, in which items were emotional facial expressions. Better affective control was associated with fewer mental health difficulties (p < .001, R2 = .15). Affective control partially accounted for the association between age group and mental health problems, z = 2.61, p = .009, Akaike information criterion = 484, with the association being strongest in young adolescents, r (27) = -.44, p = .018. Affective control further accounted for variance in the association between self-reported (but not experimental) emotion regulation and mental health (z = -3.44, p < .001, Akaike information criterion = 440). Poor affective control, especially in young adolescents, is associated with more mental health problems and higher levels of emotion regulation difficulties. Improving affective control therefore may constitute a promising target for prevention. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000099 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=416 [article] Age-related differences in affective control and its association with mental health difficulties [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur ; Jenna PARKER, Auteur ; Jovita T. LEUNG, Auteur ; Cáit GRIFFIN, Auteur ; Sarah-Jayne BLAKEMORE, Auteur . - p.329-341. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.329-341 Mots-clés : adolescence  affective control  emotion regulation  executive function  mental health Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Difficulties in regulating affect are core characteristics of a wide range of mental health conditions and are associated with deficits in cognitive control, particularly in affective contexts, affective control. The current study explored how affective control relates to mental health over the course of adolescence. We developed an Affective Control Task, which was administered to young adolescents (11-14 years; n = 29); mid-adolescents (15-18 years; n = 31), and adults (22-30 years; n = 31). The task required individuals to sort cards according to continuously changing rules: color, number, or item type. There was a neutral condition in which items were shapes, and an affective condition, in which items were emotional facial expressions. Better affective control was associated with fewer mental health difficulties (p < .001, R2 = .15). Affective control partially accounted for the association between age group and mental health problems, z = 2.61, p = .009, Akaike information criterion = 484, with the association being strongest in young adolescents, r (27) = -.44, p = .018. Affective control further accounted for variance in the association between self-reported (but not experimental) emotion regulation and mental health (z = -3.44, p < .001, Akaike information criterion = 440). Poor affective control, especially in young adolescents, is associated with more mental health problems and higher levels of emotion regulation difficulties. Improving affective control therefore may constitute a promising target for prevention. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000099 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=416

Mood and neural responses to social rejection do not seem to be altered in resilient adolescents with a history of adversity / Jessica FRITZ in Development and Psychopathology, 32-2 (May 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 32-2 (May 2020) . - p.411-423 Titre : Mood and neural responses to social rejection do not seem to be altered in resilient adolescents with a history of adversity Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jessica FRITZ, Auteur ; Jason STRETTON, Auteur ; Adrian Dahl ASKELUND, Auteur ; Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur ; Nicholas D. WALSH, Auteur ; Bernet M. ELZINGA, Auteur ; Ian M. GOODYER, Auteur ; Paul O. WILKINSON, Auteur ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.411-423 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : anterior insula  dorsal anterior cingulate cortex  mental health resilience  social rejection  social support  that could affect this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Childhood adversity (CA) increases the risk of subsequent mental health problems. Adolescent social support (from family and/or friends) reduces the risk of mental health problems after CA. However, the mechanisms of this effect remain unclear, and we speculate that they are manifested on neurodevelopmental levels. Therefore, we investigated whether family and/or friendship support at ages 14 and 17 function as intermediate variables for the relationship between CA before age 11 and affective or neural responses to social rejection feedback at age 18. We studied 55 adolescents with normative mental health at age 18 (26 with CA and therefore considered "resilient"), from a longitudinal cohort. Participants underwent a Social Feedback Task in the magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Social rejection feedback activated the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the left anterior insula. CA did not predict affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18. Yet, CA predicted better friendships at age 14 and age 18, when adolescents with and without CA had comparable mood levels. Thus, adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000178 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=426 [article] Mood and neural responses to social rejection do not seem to be altered in resilient adolescents with a history of adversity [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jessica FRITZ, Auteur ; Jason STRETTON, Auteur ; Adrian Dahl ASKELUND, Auteur ; Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur ; Nicholas D. WALSH, Auteur ; Bernet M. ELZINGA, Auteur ; Ian M. GOODYER, Auteur ; Paul O. WILKINSON, Auteur ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN, Auteur . - p.411-423. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 32-2 (May 2020) . - p.411-423 Mots-clés : anterior insula  dorsal anterior cingulate cortex  mental health resilience  social rejection  social support  that could affect this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Childhood adversity (CA) increases the risk of subsequent mental health problems. Adolescent social support (from family and/or friends) reduces the risk of mental health problems after CA. However, the mechanisms of this effect remain unclear, and we speculate that they are manifested on neurodevelopmental levels. Therefore, we investigated whether family and/or friendship support at ages 14 and 17 function as intermediate variables for the relationship between CA before age 11 and affective or neural responses to social rejection feedback at age 18. We studied 55 adolescents with normative mental health at age 18 (26 with CA and therefore considered "resilient"), from a longitudinal cohort. Participants underwent a Social Feedback Task in the magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Social rejection feedback activated the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the left anterior insula. CA did not predict affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18. Yet, CA predicted better friendships at age 14 and age 18, when adolescents with and without CA had comparable mood levels. Thus, adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000178 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=426

Social determinants of mental health during a year of the COVID-19 pandemic / Amy ORBEN ; Annabel SONGCO ; Elaine FOX ; Cecile D. LADOUCEUR ; Louise MEWTON ; Michelle MOULDS ; Jennifer H. PFEIFER ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN ; Susanne SCHWEIZER in Development and Psychopathology, 35-4 (October 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 35-4 (October 2023) . - p.1701-1713 Titre : Social determinants of mental health during a year of the COVID-19 pandemic Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy ORBEN, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur ; Cecile D. LADOUCEUR, Auteur ; Louise MEWTON, Auteur ; Michelle MOULDS, Auteur ; Jennifer H. PFEIFER, Auteur ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN, Auteur ; Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1701-1713 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : COVID-19  mental health  physical distancing  social connectedness  social rejection sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Belonging is a basic human need, with social isolation signaling a threat to biological fitness. Sensitivity to ostracism varies across individuals and the lifespan, peaking in adolescence. Government-imposed restrictions upon social interactions during COVID-19 may therefore be particularly detrimental to young people and those most sensitive to ostracism. Participants (N = 2367; 89.95% female, 11-100 years) from three countries with differing levels of government restrictions (Australia, UK, and USA) were surveyed thrice at three-month intervals (May 2020 - April 2021). Young people, and those living under the tightest government restrictions, reported the worst mental health, with these inequalities in mental health remaining constant throughout the study period. Further dissection of these results revealed that young people high on social rejection sensitivity reported the most mental health problems at the final assessment. These findings help account for the greater impact of enforced social isolation on young people?s mental health, and open novel avenues for intervention. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000396 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=515 [article] Social determinants of mental health during a year of the COVID-19 pandemic [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy ORBEN, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur ; Cecile D. LADOUCEUR, Auteur ; Louise MEWTON, Auteur ; Michelle MOULDS, Auteur ; Jennifer H. PFEIFER, Auteur ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN, Auteur ; Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur . - p.1701-1713. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 35-4 (October 2023) . - p.1701-1713 Mots-clés : COVID-19  mental health  physical distancing  social connectedness  social rejection sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Belonging is a basic human need, with social isolation signaling a threat to biological fitness. Sensitivity to ostracism varies across individuals and the lifespan, peaking in adolescence. Government-imposed restrictions upon social interactions during COVID-19 may therefore be particularly detrimental to young people and those most sensitive to ostracism. Participants (N = 2367; 89.95% female, 11-100 years) from three countries with differing levels of government restrictions (Australia, UK, and USA) were surveyed thrice at three-month intervals (May 2020 - April 2021). Young people, and those living under the tightest government restrictions, reported the worst mental health, with these inequalities in mental health remaining constant throughout the study period. Further dissection of these results revealed that young people high on social rejection sensitivity reported the most mental health problems at the final assessment. These findings help account for the greater impact of enforced social isolation on young people?s mental health, and open novel avenues for intervention. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000396 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=515

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)