
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Chang LIU |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Genetic and environmental influences on temperament development across the preschool period / Chang LIU in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-1 (January 2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Genetic and environmental influences on temperament development across the preschool period Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Chang LIU, Auteur ; Yao ZHENG, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Kimberly J. SAUDINO, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.59-70 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Preschoolers' temperament characteristics are associated with children's long-term development. Such links underscore the importance of understanding factors that shape temperament during preschool. This is the first study to examine genetic and environmental sources of developmental growth in three temperament dimensions: surgency, negative affectivity, and effortful control, during the preschool period. Methods Biometric latent growth curve modeling was used to examine genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental contributions to the invariant level of and developmental growth in temperament, using a sample of 310 same-sex twin pairs (MZ=123, DZ=187) assessed at 3, 4, and 5 years of age. Temperament was assessed using primary caregiver's report on the Child Behavior Questionnaire-Short Form. Results All three temperament dimensions demonstrated linear increases from ages 3 to 5 years. The invariant levels of all three temperament dimensions were explained by genetic and nonshared environmental factors. Growth in surgency was fully explained by nonshared environmental factors, while growth in negative affectivity was mainly explained by genetic factors. Growth in effortful control was explained by genetic and nonshared environmental factors, although neither were significant due to large bootstrap standard errors. For negative affectivity and effortful control, the genetic factors that contributed to developmental growth were independent from those associated with their invariant levels. Conclusions Collectively, these findings indicate that both genetic and nonshared environmental factors play important roles in the invariant levels of temperament. Findings also accord a critical role of children's nonshared environment in the development of surgency and to a lesser extent negative affectivity and effortful control. It is also notable that novel genetic effects contribute to developmental growth in negative affectivity and effortful control as children age, emphasizing the importance of integrating developmental models in genetic research. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13667 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=490
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-1 (January 2023) . - p.59-70[article] Genetic and environmental influences on temperament development across the preschool period [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Chang LIU, Auteur ; Yao ZHENG, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Kimberly J. SAUDINO, Auteur . - p.59-70.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-1 (January 2023) . - p.59-70
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Preschoolers' temperament characteristics are associated with children's long-term development. Such links underscore the importance of understanding factors that shape temperament during preschool. This is the first study to examine genetic and environmental sources of developmental growth in three temperament dimensions: surgency, negative affectivity, and effortful control, during the preschool period. Methods Biometric latent growth curve modeling was used to examine genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental contributions to the invariant level of and developmental growth in temperament, using a sample of 310 same-sex twin pairs (MZ=123, DZ=187) assessed at 3, 4, and 5 years of age. Temperament was assessed using primary caregiver's report on the Child Behavior Questionnaire-Short Form. Results All three temperament dimensions demonstrated linear increases from ages 3 to 5 years. The invariant levels of all three temperament dimensions were explained by genetic and nonshared environmental factors. Growth in surgency was fully explained by nonshared environmental factors, while growth in negative affectivity was mainly explained by genetic factors. Growth in effortful control was explained by genetic and nonshared environmental factors, although neither were significant due to large bootstrap standard errors. For negative affectivity and effortful control, the genetic factors that contributed to developmental growth were independent from those associated with their invariant levels. Conclusions Collectively, these findings indicate that both genetic and nonshared environmental factors play important roles in the invariant levels of temperament. Findings also accord a critical role of children's nonshared environment in the development of surgency and to a lesser extent negative affectivity and effortful control. It is also notable that novel genetic effects contribute to developmental growth in negative affectivity and effortful control as children age, emphasizing the importance of integrating developmental models in genetic research. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13667 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=490 Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences / Robyn A. CREE in Development and Psychopathology, 33-4 (October 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Robyn A. CREE, Auteur ; Chang LIU, Auteur ; Ralitza GUEORGUIEVA, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Misaki N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Charles R. BEEKMAN, Auteur ; Megan V. SMITH, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1229-1247 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adoption design differential susceptibility externalizing psychopathology factor social competence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, “plasticity” genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or “sensitivity.” En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000450 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-4 (October 2021) . - p.1229-1247[article] Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Robyn A. CREE, Auteur ; Chang LIU, Auteur ; Ralitza GUEORGUIEVA, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur ; Leslie D. LEVE, Auteur ; Christian M. CONNELL, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Misaki N. NATSUAKI, Auteur ; Jody M. GANIBAN, Auteur ; Charles R. BEEKMAN, Auteur ; Megan V. SMITH, Auteur ; David REISS, Auteur . - p.1229-1247.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-4 (October 2021) . - p.1229-1247
Mots-clés : adoption design differential susceptibility externalizing psychopathology factor social competence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, “plasticity” genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or “sensitivity.” En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000450 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457