Cognitive Bias Modification Reduces Social Anxiety Symptoms in Socially Anxious Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial / Annette M. KLEIN in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48-9 (September 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-9 (September 2018) . - p.3116-3126 Titre : Cognitive Bias Modification Reduces Social Anxiety Symptoms in Socially Anxious Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Annette M. KLEIN, Auteur ; Elske SALEMINK, Auteur ; Eva DE HULLU, Auteur ; Esther HOUTKAMP, Auteur ; Marlissa PAPA, Auteur ; Mariët VAN DER MOLEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3116-3126 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Cognitive bias modification  Content-specificity  Interpretation bias  Mild intellectual disability  Social anxiety Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The goal of this study was to examine the effects of Cognitive Bias Modification training for Interpretation (CBM-I) in socially anxious adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (MID). A total of 69 socially anxious adolescents with MID were randomly assigned to either a positive or a neutral control-CMB-I-training. Training included five sessions in a 3-week period, and each session consisted of 40 training items. Adolescents in the positive training group showed a significant reduction in negative interpretation bias on the two interpretation bias tasks after training compared to adolescents in the control-training group. Furthermore, in contrast to the control-training group, adolescents in the positive training reported a significant reduction of their social anxiety symptoms 10 weeks post-training. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3579-9 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=367 [article] Cognitive Bias Modification Reduces Social Anxiety Symptoms in Socially Anxious Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial [texte imprimé] / Annette M. KLEIN, Auteur ; Elske SALEMINK, Auteur ; Eva DE HULLU, Auteur ; Esther HOUTKAMP, Auteur ; Marlissa PAPA, Auteur ; Mariët VAN DER MOLEN, Auteur . - p.3116-3126. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-9 (September 2018) . - p.3116-3126 Mots-clés : Cognitive bias modification  Content-specificity  Interpretation bias  Mild intellectual disability  Social anxiety Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The goal of this study was to examine the effects of Cognitive Bias Modification training for Interpretation (CBM-I) in socially anxious adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (MID). A total of 69 socially anxious adolescents with MID were randomly assigned to either a positive or a neutral control-CMB-I-training. Training included five sessions in a 3-week period, and each session consisted of 40 training items. Adolescents in the positive training group showed a significant reduction in negative interpretation bias on the two interpretation bias tasks after training compared to adolescents in the control-training group. Furthermore, in contrast to the control-training group, adolescents in the positive training reported a significant reduction of their social anxiety symptoms 10 weeks post-training. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3579-9 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=367

Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders - a commentary on Roest et al. (2022) / Tycho J. DEKKERS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-3 (March 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.470-473 Titre : Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders - a commentary on Roest et al. (2022) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Annabeth P. GROENMAN, Auteur ; Pim CUIJPERS, Auteur ; Pieter J. HOEKSTRA, Auteur ; Marjolein LUMAN, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur ; Arne POPMA, Auteur ; Nanda N. ROMMELSE, Auteur ; Elske SALEMINK, Auteur ; Yvonne A.J. STIKKELBROEK, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.470-473 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : An important question in mental healthcare for children is whether treatments are effective and safe in the long run. Here, we comment on a recent editorial perspective by Roest et al. (2022), who argue, based on an overview of systematic reviews, Ëœthat there is no convincing evidence that interventions for the most common childhood disorders are beneficial in the long term’. We believe that the available evidence does not justify this conclusion and express our concern regarding the harmful effects of their message. We show that there is evidence to suggest beneficial longer term treatment effects for each of the disorders and explain why evidence-based treatment should be offered to children with mental disorders. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13715 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493 [article] Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders - a commentary on Roest et al. (2022) [texte imprimé] / Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Annabeth P. GROENMAN, Auteur ; Pim CUIJPERS, Auteur ; Pieter J. HOEKSTRA, Auteur ; Marjolein LUMAN, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur ; Arne POPMA, Auteur ; Nanda N. ROMMELSE, Auteur ; Elske SALEMINK, Auteur ; Yvonne A.J. STIKKELBROEK, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur . - p.470-473. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.470-473 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : An important question in mental healthcare for children is whether treatments are effective and safe in the long run. Here, we comment on a recent editorial perspective by Roest et al. (2022), who argue, based on an overview of systematic reviews, Ëœthat there is no convincing evidence that interventions for the most common childhood disorders are beneficial in the long term’. We believe that the available evidence does not justify this conclusion and express our concern regarding the harmful effects of their message. We show that there is evidence to suggest beneficial longer term treatment effects for each of the disorders and explain why evidence-based treatment should be offered to children with mental disorders. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13715 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2) Par page : 25 50 100 200