Predictors of problematic adult alcohol, cannabis, and other substance use: A longitudinal study of two samples / Natalie GOULTER ; Jennifer GODWIN ; Robert J. MCMAHON ; Kenneth A. DODGE ; Max CROWLEY ; Gregory S. PETTIT ; John E. BATES ; John E. LOCHMAN in Development and Psychopathology, 35-4 (October 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 35-4 (October 2023) . - p.2028-2043 Titre : Predictors of problematic adult alcohol, cannabis, and other substance use: A longitudinal study of two samples Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Natalie GOULTER, Auteur ; Jennifer GODWIN, Auteur ; Robert J. MCMAHON, Auteur ; Kenneth A. DODGE, Auteur ; Max CROWLEY, Auteur ; Gregory S. PETTIT, Auteur ; John E. BATES, Auteur ; John E. LOCHMAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2028-2043 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : alcohol  cannabis  development  risk factors  substance use Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined whether a key set of adolescent and early adulthood risk factors predicts problematic alcohol, cannabis, and other substance use in established adulthood. Two independent samples from the Child Development Project (CDP; n = 585; 48% girls; 81% White, 17% Black, 2% other race/ethnicity) and Fast Track (FT; n = 463; 45% girls; 52% White, 43% Black, 5% other race/ethnicity) were recruited in childhood and followed through age 34 (CDP) or 32 (FT). Predictors of substance use were assessed in adolescence based on adolescent and parent reports and in early adulthood based on adult self-reports. Adults reported their own problematic substance use in established adulthood. In both samples, more risk factors from adolescence and early adulthood predicted problematic alcohol use in established adulthood (compared to problematic cannabis use and other substance use). Externalizing behaviors and prior substance use in early adulthood were consistent predictors of problematic alcohol and cannabis misuse in established adulthood across samples; other predictors were specific to the sample and type of substance misuse. Prevention efforts might benefit from tailoring to address risk factors for specific substances, but prioritizing prevention of externalizing behaviors holds promise for preventing both alcohol and cannabis misuse in established adulthood. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000670 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=515 [article] Predictors of problematic adult alcohol, cannabis, and other substance use: A longitudinal study of two samples [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Natalie GOULTER, Auteur ; Jennifer GODWIN, Auteur ; Robert J. MCMAHON, Auteur ; Kenneth A. DODGE, Auteur ; Max CROWLEY, Auteur ; Gregory S. PETTIT, Auteur ; John E. BATES, Auteur ; John E. LOCHMAN, Auteur . - p.2028-2043. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 35-4 (October 2023) . - p.2028-2043 Mots-clés : alcohol  cannabis  development  risk factors  substance use Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined whether a key set of adolescent and early adulthood risk factors predicts problematic alcohol, cannabis, and other substance use in established adulthood. Two independent samples from the Child Development Project (CDP; n = 585; 48% girls; 81% White, 17% Black, 2% other race/ethnicity) and Fast Track (FT; n = 463; 45% girls; 52% White, 43% Black, 5% other race/ethnicity) were recruited in childhood and followed through age 34 (CDP) or 32 (FT). Predictors of substance use were assessed in adolescence based on adolescent and parent reports and in early adulthood based on adult self-reports. Adults reported their own problematic substance use in established adulthood. In both samples, more risk factors from adolescence and early adulthood predicted problematic alcohol use in established adulthood (compared to problematic cannabis use and other substance use). Externalizing behaviors and prior substance use in early adulthood were consistent predictors of problematic alcohol and cannabis misuse in established adulthood across samples; other predictors were specific to the sample and type of substance misuse. Prevention efforts might benefit from tailoring to address risk factors for specific substances, but prioritizing prevention of externalizing behaviors holds promise for preventing both alcohol and cannabis misuse in established adulthood. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000670 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=515

Shifting the paradigm of research-to-policy impact: Infrastructure for improving researcher engagement and collective action / Taylor Scott ; Max CROWLEY ; Elizabeth Long ; Brandon Balma ; Jessica Pugel ; Brittany Gay ; Angelique Day ; Jennie NOLL in Development and Psychopathology, 36-5 (December 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 36-5 (December 2024) . - p.2324-2337 Titre : Shifting the paradigm of research-to-policy impact: Infrastructure for improving researcher engagement and collective action : Development and Psychopathology Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Taylor Scott, Auteur ; Max CROWLEY, Auteur ; Elizabeth Long, Auteur ; Brandon Balma, Auteur ; Jessica Pugel, Auteur ; Brittany Gay, Auteur ; Angelique Day, Auteur ; Jennie NOLL, Auteur Année de publication : 2024 Article en page(s) : p.2324-2337 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : evidence-based policy  research impact  research translation  science policy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The body of scientific knowledge accumulated by the scholarly disciplines such as Developmental Psychopathology can achieve meaningful public impact if wielded and used in policy decision-making. Scientific study of how policymakers use research evidence underscores the need for researchers' policy engagement; however, barriers in the academy create conditions in which there is a need for infrastructure that increases the feasibility of researchers' partnership with policymakers. This need led to the development of the Research-to-Policy Collaboration model, a systematic approach for developing "boundary spanning" infrastructure, which has been experimentally tested and shown to improve policymakers' use of research evidence and bolster researchers' policy skills and engagement. This paper presents original research regarding the optimization of the RPC model, which sought to better serve and engage scholars across the globe. Trial findings shed light on ways to improve conditions that make good use of researchers' time for policy engagement via a virtual platform and enhanced e-communications. Future directions, implications, and practical guidelines for how scientists can engage in the political process and improve the impact of a collective discipline are also discussed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000270 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=545 [article] Shifting the paradigm of research-to-policy impact: Infrastructure for improving researcher engagement and collective action : Development and Psychopathology [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Taylor Scott, Auteur ; Max CROWLEY, Auteur ; Elizabeth Long, Auteur ; Brandon Balma, Auteur ; Jessica Pugel, Auteur ; Brittany Gay, Auteur ; Angelique Day, Auteur ; Jennie NOLL, Auteur . - 2024 . - p.2324-2337. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 36-5 (December 2024) . - p.2324-2337 Mots-clés : evidence-based policy  research impact  research translation  science policy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The body of scientific knowledge accumulated by the scholarly disciplines such as Developmental Psychopathology can achieve meaningful public impact if wielded and used in policy decision-making. Scientific study of how policymakers use research evidence underscores the need for researchers' policy engagement; however, barriers in the academy create conditions in which there is a need for infrastructure that increases the feasibility of researchers' partnership with policymakers. This need led to the development of the Research-to-Policy Collaboration model, a systematic approach for developing "boundary spanning" infrastructure, which has been experimentally tested and shown to improve policymakers' use of research evidence and bolster researchers' policy skills and engagement. This paper presents original research regarding the optimization of the RPC model, which sought to better serve and engage scholars across the globe. Trial findings shed light on ways to improve conditions that make good use of researchers' time for policy engagement via a virtual platform and enhanced e-communications. Future directions, implications, and practical guidelines for how scientists can engage in the political process and improve the impact of a collective discipline are also discussed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000270 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=545

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)