Do dimensions of childhood adversity differ in their direct associations with youth psychopathology? A meta-analysis / Amy Hyoeun LEE in Development and Psychopathology, 37-2 (May 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 37-2 (May 2025) . - p.871-901 Titre : Do dimensions of childhood adversity differ in their direct associations with youth psychopathology? A meta-analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Amy Hyoeun LEE, Auteur ; Yukihiro KITAGAWA, Auteur ; Rebecca MIRHASHEM, Auteur ; Micaela RODRIGUEZ, Auteur ; Romola HILERIO, Auteur ; Kristin BERNARD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.871-901 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescents  children  deprivation  meta-analysis  psychopathology  threat Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Growing evidence supports the unique pathways by which threat and deprivation, two core dimensions of adversity, confer risk for youth psychopathology. However, the extent to which these dimensions differ in their direct associations with youth psychopathology remains unclear. The primary aim of this preregistered meta-analysis was to synthesize the associations between threat, deprivation, internalizing, externalizing, and trauma-specific psychopathology. Because threat is proposed to be directly linked with socioemotional development, we hypothesized that the magnitude of associations between threat and psychopathology would be larger than those with deprivation. We conducted a search for peer-reviewed articles in English using PubMed and PsycINFO databases through August 2022. Studies that assessed both threat and deprivation and used previously validated measures of youth psychopathology were included. One hundred and twenty-seven articles were included in the synthesis (N = 163,767). Results of our three-level meta-analyses indicated that adversity dimension significantly moderated the associations between adversity and psychopathology, such that the magnitude of effects for threat (r?s = .21-26) were consistently larger than those for deprivation (r?s = .16-.19). These differences were more pronounced when accounting for the threat-deprivation correlation. Additional significant moderators included emotional abuse and youth self-report of adversity. Findings are consistent with the Dimensional Model of Adversity and Psychopathology, with clinical, research, and policy implications. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000737 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=552 [article] Do dimensions of childhood adversity differ in their direct associations with youth psychopathology? A meta-analysis [texte imprimé] / Amy Hyoeun LEE, Auteur ; Yukihiro KITAGAWA, Auteur ; Rebecca MIRHASHEM, Auteur ; Micaela RODRIGUEZ, Auteur ; Romola HILERIO, Auteur ; Kristin BERNARD, Auteur . - p.871-901. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 37-2 (May 2025) . - p.871-901 Mots-clés : adolescents  children  deprivation  meta-analysis  psychopathology  threat Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Growing evidence supports the unique pathways by which threat and deprivation, two core dimensions of adversity, confer risk for youth psychopathology. However, the extent to which these dimensions differ in their direct associations with youth psychopathology remains unclear. The primary aim of this preregistered meta-analysis was to synthesize the associations between threat, deprivation, internalizing, externalizing, and trauma-specific psychopathology. Because threat is proposed to be directly linked with socioemotional development, we hypothesized that the magnitude of associations between threat and psychopathology would be larger than those with deprivation. We conducted a search for peer-reviewed articles in English using PubMed and PsycINFO databases through August 2022. Studies that assessed both threat and deprivation and used previously validated measures of youth psychopathology were included. One hundred and twenty-seven articles were included in the synthesis (N = 163,767). Results of our three-level meta-analyses indicated that adversity dimension significantly moderated the associations between adversity and psychopathology, such that the magnitude of effects for threat (r?s = .21-26) were consistently larger than those for deprivation (r?s = .16-.19). These differences were more pronounced when accounting for the threat-deprivation correlation. Additional significant moderators included emotional abuse and youth self-report of adversity. Findings are consistent with the Dimensional Model of Adversity and Psychopathology, with clinical, research, and policy implications. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000737 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=552

Network analysis of dimensions of childhood adversity and adolescent health risk behaviors / Laura B. GODFREY in Development and Psychopathology, 38-3 (August 2026)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 38-3 (August 2026) . - p.1167-1180 Titre : Network analysis of dimensions of childhood adversity and adolescent health risk behaviors Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Laura B. GODFREY, Auteur ; Amy Hyoeun LEE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1167-1180 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Childhood adversity  deprivation  health risk behaviors  network analysis  threat Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Childhood adversity is associated with increased engagement in health risk behaviors (HRBs), such as substance use, violence, and risky sexual behaviors during adolescence, which contribute to leading causes of death and disability throughout the lifespan. Threat and deprivation are two dimensions of adversity that impact health and wellbeing through partially distinct developmental pathways, but no studies have examined if and how HRBs differ by adversity dimension. This pre-registered network analysis examined the independent associations between threat, deprivation, and adolescent HRBs using data from the 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. We hypothesized that both adversity dimensions would be associated with HRBs, with stronger associations for threat compared to deprivation. Participants were U.S. high school students (N = 7,691; 52% male, 48% female). Forty-six percent were white, 26% multiple races, 12% Black, 7% American Indian/Alaska Native, 4% Asian, < 1% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and 20% Hispanic. Consistent with our hypotheses, network structures revealed that both threat and deprivation were associated with HRBs, the patterns of such associations varied by dimension, and the overall strength and number of HRB associations was greater for threat. Findings support the utility of dimensional models in linking childhood adversity to adolescent HRBs, with implications for research and clinical practice. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579425101053 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=590 [article] Network analysis of dimensions of childhood adversity and adolescent health risk behaviors [texte imprimé] / Laura B. GODFREY, Auteur ; Amy Hyoeun LEE, Auteur . - p.1167-1180. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 38-3 (August 2026) . - p.1167-1180 Mots-clés : Childhood adversity  deprivation  health risk behaviors  network analysis  threat Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Childhood adversity is associated with increased engagement in health risk behaviors (HRBs), such as substance use, violence, and risky sexual behaviors during adolescence, which contribute to leading causes of death and disability throughout the lifespan. Threat and deprivation are two dimensions of adversity that impact health and wellbeing through partially distinct developmental pathways, but no studies have examined if and how HRBs differ by adversity dimension. This pre-registered network analysis examined the independent associations between threat, deprivation, and adolescent HRBs using data from the 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. We hypothesized that both adversity dimensions would be associated with HRBs, with stronger associations for threat compared to deprivation. Participants were U.S. high school students (N = 7,691; 52% male, 48% female). Forty-six percent were white, 26% multiple races, 12% Black, 7% American Indian/Alaska Native, 4% Asian, < 1% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and 20% Hispanic. Consistent with our hypotheses, network structures revealed that both threat and deprivation were associated with HRBs, the patterns of such associations varied by dimension, and the overall strength and number of HRB associations was greater for threat. Findings support the utility of dimensional models in linking childhood adversity to adolescent HRBs, with implications for research and clinical practice. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579425101053 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=590

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2) Par page : 25 50 100 200