Autistic and non-autistic prosocial decision-making: The impact of recipient neurotype / Peter RUSH in Research in Autism, 128 (October 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism > 128 (October 2025) . - p.202710 Titre : Autistic and non-autistic prosocial decision-making: The impact of recipient neurotype Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Peter RUSH, Auteur ; Connor T. KEATING, Auteur ; Selma LUGTMEIJER, Auteur ; Evie ALLMARK, Auteur ; Anna DAVIS, Auteur ; Aradhna BEEJADHUR, Auteur ; Amy TARLING, Auteur ; Samuel HANNON, Auteur ; Kelan TODD, Auteur ; Alexander IDDLES, Auteur ; Chaitrali VICHARE, Auteur ; Michael J. M. GACHOMBA, Auteur ; Patricia L. LOCKWOOD, Auteur ; Matthew APPS, Auteur ; Sophie SOWDEN-CARVALHO, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.202710 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Adults  Prosocial behaviour  Decision-making  Neurotype-matching Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A body of research suggests cross-neurotype interpersonal interactions may be more challenging, and non-autistic individuals show less interest in interacting with their autistic peers. However, it is not clear whether such cross-neurotype differences extend to prosocial decision-making behaviour – something that is vital for forming and maintaining social bonds. Using a physical-effort-based decision-making paradigm, in combination with computational modelling, we examined 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic individuals’ prosocial willingness to exert physical effort for oneself and others, as a function of whether the beneficiary shares their neurotype or not. We compared decisions to exert effort and action energisation when participants made decisions for the Self, Other Same neurotype and Other Different neurotype. Results showed a robust self-bias in effort discounting, with both groups choosing to exert more effort for themselves than others, and no differences between same and different neurotype others. However, while non-autistic participants showed no difference in action energisation between the same and different neurotype others, autistic participants exerted significantly more force for others of the same neurotype. Implicit, but not explicit, biases held about autism played a role: in autistic participants, higher implicit autism stigma predicted differences in effort discounting between same and different neurotype others, while in non-autistic participants, implicit bias predicted differences in actual effort exerted rather than decision-making. This work has important implications for understanding how interactor neurotypes and autism-specific biases may feed into prosocial decision-making contexts such as employment, health and education settings, where autistic individuals face the everyday consideration of whether to disclose their diagnostic status. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2025.202710 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=570 [article] Autistic and non-autistic prosocial decision-making: The impact of recipient neurotype [texte imprimé] / Peter RUSH, Auteur ; Connor T. KEATING, Auteur ; Selma LUGTMEIJER, Auteur ; Evie ALLMARK, Auteur ; Anna DAVIS, Auteur ; Aradhna BEEJADHUR, Auteur ; Amy TARLING, Auteur ; Samuel HANNON, Auteur ; Kelan TODD, Auteur ; Alexander IDDLES, Auteur ; Chaitrali VICHARE, Auteur ; Michael J. M. GACHOMBA, Auteur ; Patricia L. LOCKWOOD, Auteur ; Matthew APPS, Auteur ; Sophie SOWDEN-CARVALHO, Auteur . - p.202710. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism > 128 (October 2025) . - p.202710 Mots-clés : Autism  Adults  Prosocial behaviour  Decision-making  Neurotype-matching Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A body of research suggests cross-neurotype interpersonal interactions may be more challenging, and non-autistic individuals show less interest in interacting with their autistic peers. However, it is not clear whether such cross-neurotype differences extend to prosocial decision-making behaviour – something that is vital for forming and maintaining social bonds. Using a physical-effort-based decision-making paradigm, in combination with computational modelling, we examined 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic individuals’ prosocial willingness to exert physical effort for oneself and others, as a function of whether the beneficiary shares their neurotype or not. We compared decisions to exert effort and action energisation when participants made decisions for the Self, Other Same neurotype and Other Different neurotype. Results showed a robust self-bias in effort discounting, with both groups choosing to exert more effort for themselves than others, and no differences between same and different neurotype others. However, while non-autistic participants showed no difference in action energisation between the same and different neurotype others, autistic participants exerted significantly more force for others of the same neurotype. Implicit, but not explicit, biases held about autism played a role: in autistic participants, higher implicit autism stigma predicted differences in effort discounting between same and different neurotype others, while in non-autistic participants, implicit bias predicted differences in actual effort exerted rather than decision-making. This work has important implications for understanding how interactor neurotypes and autism-specific biases may feed into prosocial decision-making contexts such as employment, health and education settings, where autistic individuals face the everyday consideration of whether to disclose their diagnostic status. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2025.202710 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=570

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1) Par page : 25 50 100 200