Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Shirley A. REYNOLDS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Is cognitive bias modification training truly beneficial for adolescents? / Stella W. Y. CHAN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-11 (November 2015)
[article]
Titre : Is cognitive bias modification training truly beneficial for adolescents? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Stella W. Y. CHAN, Auteur ; Jennifer Y. F. LAU, Auteur ; Shirley A. REYNOLDS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1239-1248 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Cognitive Bias Modification interpretation adolescence depression anxiety stress reactivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been shown to change interpretation biases commonly associated with anxiety and depression and may help ameliorate symptoms of these disorders. However, its evidence base for adolescents is scarce. Previous results have been hard to interpret because of methodological issues. In particular, many studies have used negative bias training as the control condition. This would tend to inflate any apparent benefits of CBM compared to a neutral control. Most studies also only examined the effects of a single training session and lacked follow-up assessment or ecologically valid outcome measures. Method Seventy-four adolescents, aged 16–18 years, were randomised to two sessions of CBM training or neutral control. Interpretation bias and mood were assessed three times: at baseline, immediately post-training and 1 week post-training. A controlled experimental stressor was also used, and responses to everyday stressors were recorded for 1 week after training to assess responses to psychological challenges. Feedback for the training programme was collected. Results The CBM group reported a greater reduction in negative affect than control participants. However, other hypothesised advantages of CBM were not demonstrated. Regardless of training group, participants reported increased positive interpretations, decreased negative interpretations, reduced depressive symptoms and no change in trait anxiety. The two groups did not differ in their stress reactivity. After controlling for group differences in training performance, all the mood effects disappeared. Conclusions When tested under stringent experimental conditions the effects of CBM in healthy adolescents appear to be minimal. Future studies should concentrate on participants with elevated cognitive biases and/or mood symptoms who may be more sensitive to CBM. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12368 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=270
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-11 (November 2015) . - p.1239-1248[article] Is cognitive bias modification training truly beneficial for adolescents? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Stella W. Y. CHAN, Auteur ; Jennifer Y. F. LAU, Auteur ; Shirley A. REYNOLDS, Auteur . - p.1239-1248.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-11 (November 2015) . - p.1239-1248
Mots-clés : Cognitive Bias Modification interpretation adolescence depression anxiety stress reactivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been shown to change interpretation biases commonly associated with anxiety and depression and may help ameliorate symptoms of these disorders. However, its evidence base for adolescents is scarce. Previous results have been hard to interpret because of methodological issues. In particular, many studies have used negative bias training as the control condition. This would tend to inflate any apparent benefits of CBM compared to a neutral control. Most studies also only examined the effects of a single training session and lacked follow-up assessment or ecologically valid outcome measures. Method Seventy-four adolescents, aged 16–18 years, were randomised to two sessions of CBM training or neutral control. Interpretation bias and mood were assessed three times: at baseline, immediately post-training and 1 week post-training. A controlled experimental stressor was also used, and responses to everyday stressors were recorded for 1 week after training to assess responses to psychological challenges. Feedback for the training programme was collected. Results The CBM group reported a greater reduction in negative affect than control participants. However, other hypothesised advantages of CBM were not demonstrated. Regardless of training group, participants reported increased positive interpretations, decreased negative interpretations, reduced depressive symptoms and no change in trait anxiety. The two groups did not differ in their stress reactivity. After controlling for group differences in training performance, all the mood effects disappeared. Conclusions When tested under stringent experimental conditions the effects of CBM in healthy adolescents appear to be minimal. Future studies should concentrate on participants with elevated cognitive biases and/or mood symptoms who may be more sensitive to CBM. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12368 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=270