- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Rebecca GRAY |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Measuring adolescents' exposure to victimization: The Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study / Helen L. FISHER in Development and Psychopathology, 27-4 (Part 2) (November 2015)
[article]
Titre : Measuring adolescents' exposure to victimization: The Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Helen L. FISHER, Auteur ; Avshalom CASPI, Auteur ; Terrie E. MOFFITT, Auteur ; Jasmin WERTZ, Auteur ; Rebecca GRAY, Auteur ; Joanne NEWBURY, Auteur ; Antony AMBLER, Auteur ; Helena ZAVOS, Auteur ; Andrea DANESE, Auteur ; Jonathan MILL, Auteur ; Candice L. ODGERS, Auteur ; Carmine PARIANTE, Auteur ; Chloe C. Y. WONG, Auteur ; Louise ARSENEAULT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1399-1416 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This paper presents multilevel findings on adolescents' victimization exposure from a large longitudinal cohort of twins. Data were obtained from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, an epidemiological study of 2,232 children (1,116 twin pairs) followed to 18 years of age (with 93% retention). To assess adolescent victimization, we combined best practices in survey research on victimization with optimal approaches to measuring life stress and traumatic experiences, and introduce a reliable system for coding severity of victimization. One in three children experienced at least one type of severe victimization during adolescence (crime victimization, peer/sibling victimization, Internet/mobile phone victimization, sexual victimization, family violence, maltreatment, or neglect), and most types of victimization were more prevalent among children from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Exposure to multiple victimization types was common, as was revictimization; over half of those physically maltreated in childhood were also exposed to severe physical violence in adolescence. Biometric twin analyses revealed that environmental factors had the greatest influence on most types of victimization, while severe physical maltreatment from caregivers during adolescence was predominantly influenced by heritable factors. The findings from this study showcase how distinct levels of victimization measurement can be harmonized in large-scale studies of health and development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000838 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=273
in Development and Psychopathology > 27-4 (Part 2) (November 2015) . - p.1399-1416[article] Measuring adolescents' exposure to victimization: The Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Helen L. FISHER, Auteur ; Avshalom CASPI, Auteur ; Terrie E. MOFFITT, Auteur ; Jasmin WERTZ, Auteur ; Rebecca GRAY, Auteur ; Joanne NEWBURY, Auteur ; Antony AMBLER, Auteur ; Helena ZAVOS, Auteur ; Andrea DANESE, Auteur ; Jonathan MILL, Auteur ; Candice L. ODGERS, Auteur ; Carmine PARIANTE, Auteur ; Chloe C. Y. WONG, Auteur ; Louise ARSENEAULT, Auteur . - p.1399-1416.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 27-4 (Part 2) (November 2015) . - p.1399-1416
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This paper presents multilevel findings on adolescents' victimization exposure from a large longitudinal cohort of twins. Data were obtained from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, an epidemiological study of 2,232 children (1,116 twin pairs) followed to 18 years of age (with 93% retention). To assess adolescent victimization, we combined best practices in survey research on victimization with optimal approaches to measuring life stress and traumatic experiences, and introduce a reliable system for coding severity of victimization. One in three children experienced at least one type of severe victimization during adolescence (crime victimization, peer/sibling victimization, Internet/mobile phone victimization, sexual victimization, family violence, maltreatment, or neglect), and most types of victimization were more prevalent among children from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Exposure to multiple victimization types was common, as was revictimization; over half of those physically maltreated in childhood were also exposed to severe physical violence in adolescence. Biometric twin analyses revealed that environmental factors had the greatest influence on most types of victimization, while severe physical maltreatment from caregivers during adolescence was predominantly influenced by heritable factors. The findings from this study showcase how distinct levels of victimization measurement can be harmonized in large-scale studies of health and development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000838 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=273 Teaching receptive vocabulary to two autistic children: A replicated, clinic-based, single case experimental design / Rebecca GRAY in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 9 (January-December 2024)
[article]
Titre : Teaching receptive vocabulary to two autistic children: A replicated, clinic-based, single case experimental design Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Rebecca GRAY, Auteur ; Deirdre M. MULDOON, Auteur ; Emily B. MCCARTHY, Auteur Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Receptive language autism spectrum disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background and aims This study was conducted in a clinical setting with the aim of replicating previously used procedures for teaching receptive vocabulary. Researchers increased the number of vocabulary words and maintained use of match-to-sample (MtS), prompting, and reinforcement procedures. Researchers were also interested in the efficacy of the intervention from caregivers' perspectives. Methods Using a concurrent multiple baseline design, two autistic preschoolers with receptive language impairment were taught to identify 30 common objects. MtS, prompting, and reinforcement procedures were individualized to support each child. Maintenance checks and generalization probes were completed after a predetermined number of intervention sessions (i.e. three or four clinic sessions). A social validity questionnaire was completed by parents following the final maintenance check. Results Receptive object identification improved significantly for both participants. Despite exposure to vocabulary targets for only three or four sessions, they generalized the vocabulary targets to non-identical pictures and maintained words at maintenance checks. Participants were most successful when researchers individualized prompting and reinforcement. Conclusion MtS, prompting, and reinforcement were effective procedures for improving object identification, even with a limited number of intervention sessions. To support varying learner profiles, modifying prompting and reinforcement procedures was necessary. Caregivers of both participants reported positive improvements in areas such as communication, attention, and behaviors. Implications This replicated study provides support for MtS, prompting, and reinforcement as means of teaching receptive vocabulary to autistic preschoolers in a clinical setting. The materials used were simple and cost-effective. Overall, this study outlines and supports a flexible and effective evidence-based practice to teach receptive language to autistic children. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969415241258699 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=538
in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments > 9 (January-December 2024)[article] Teaching receptive vocabulary to two autistic children: A replicated, clinic-based, single case experimental design [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rebecca GRAY, Auteur ; Deirdre M. MULDOON, Auteur ; Emily B. MCCARTHY, Auteur.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments > 9 (January-December 2024)
Mots-clés : Receptive language autism spectrum disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background and aims This study was conducted in a clinical setting with the aim of replicating previously used procedures for teaching receptive vocabulary. Researchers increased the number of vocabulary words and maintained use of match-to-sample (MtS), prompting, and reinforcement procedures. Researchers were also interested in the efficacy of the intervention from caregivers' perspectives. Methods Using a concurrent multiple baseline design, two autistic preschoolers with receptive language impairment were taught to identify 30 common objects. MtS, prompting, and reinforcement procedures were individualized to support each child. Maintenance checks and generalization probes were completed after a predetermined number of intervention sessions (i.e. three or four clinic sessions). A social validity questionnaire was completed by parents following the final maintenance check. Results Receptive object identification improved significantly for both participants. Despite exposure to vocabulary targets for only three or four sessions, they generalized the vocabulary targets to non-identical pictures and maintained words at maintenance checks. Participants were most successful when researchers individualized prompting and reinforcement. Conclusion MtS, prompting, and reinforcement were effective procedures for improving object identification, even with a limited number of intervention sessions. To support varying learner profiles, modifying prompting and reinforcement procedures was necessary. Caregivers of both participants reported positive improvements in areas such as communication, attention, and behaviors. Implications This replicated study provides support for MtS, prompting, and reinforcement as means of teaching receptive vocabulary to autistic preschoolers in a clinical setting. The materials used were simple and cost-effective. Overall, this study outlines and supports a flexible and effective evidence-based practice to teach receptive language to autistic children. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969415241258699 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=538