Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur S. D. BENNETT |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Practitioner Review: Unguided and guided self-help interventions for common mental health disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis / S. D. BENNETT in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60-8 (August 2019)
[article]
Titre : Practitioner Review: Unguided and guided self-help interventions for common mental health disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : S. D. BENNETT, Auteur ; P. CUIJPERS, Auteur ; D. D. EBERT, Auteur ; M. MCKENZIE SMITH, Auteur ; A. E. COUGHTREY, Auteur ; I. HEYMAN, Auteur ; G. MANZOTTI, Auteur ; R. SHAFRAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.828-847 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Self-help adolescents anxiety children depression disruptive behaviour Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Mental health problems are common in children and adolescents, yet evidence-based treatments are hard to access. Self-help interventions can increase such access. The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of guided and unguided self-help for children and young people with symptoms of common mental health disorders. In contrast to previous reviews of self-help in children, all types of self-help and multiple mental health disorders were investigated in order to increase power to investigate potential moderators of efficacy. Importantly, studies with control arms as well as those comparing against traditional face-to-face treatments were included. Fifty studies (n = 3396 participants in self-help/guided self-help conditions) met the inclusion criteria. Results demonstrated a moderate positive effect size for guided and unguided self-help interventions when compared against a control group (n = 44; g = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.61, p < .01) and a small but significant negative effect size when compared to other therapies (n = 15; g = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.07, p < .01). Few potential moderators had a significant effect on outcome. Most comparisons resulted in significant heterogeneity and therefore results are interpreted with caution. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13010 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=404
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-8 (August 2019) . - p.828-847[article] Practitioner Review: Unguided and guided self-help interventions for common mental health disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / S. D. BENNETT, Auteur ; P. CUIJPERS, Auteur ; D. D. EBERT, Auteur ; M. MCKENZIE SMITH, Auteur ; A. E. COUGHTREY, Auteur ; I. HEYMAN, Auteur ; G. MANZOTTI, Auteur ; R. SHAFRAN, Auteur . - p.828-847.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-8 (August 2019) . - p.828-847
Mots-clés : Self-help adolescents anxiety children depression disruptive behaviour Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Mental health problems are common in children and adolescents, yet evidence-based treatments are hard to access. Self-help interventions can increase such access. The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of guided and unguided self-help for children and young people with symptoms of common mental health disorders. In contrast to previous reviews of self-help in children, all types of self-help and multiple mental health disorders were investigated in order to increase power to investigate potential moderators of efficacy. Importantly, studies with control arms as well as those comparing against traditional face-to-face treatments were included. Fifty studies (n = 3396 participants in self-help/guided self-help conditions) met the inclusion criteria. Results demonstrated a moderate positive effect size for guided and unguided self-help interventions when compared against a control group (n = 44; g = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.61, p < .01) and a small but significant negative effect size when compared to other therapies (n = 15; g = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.07, p < .01). Few potential moderators had a significant effect on outcome. Most comparisons resulted in significant heterogeneity and therefore results are interpreted with caution. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13010 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=404