Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Julio VAQUERIZO SERRANO |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Annual Research Review: Prevention of psychosis in adolescents - systematic review and meta-analysis of advances in detection, prognosis and intervention / Ana CATALAN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62-5 (May 2021)
[article]
Titre : Annual Research Review: Prevention of psychosis in adolescents - systematic review and meta-analysis of advances in detection, prognosis and intervention Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Ana CATALAN, Auteur ; Gonzalo SALAZAR DE PABLO, Auteur ; Julio VAQUERIZO SERRANO, Auteur ; Pierluca MOSILLO, Auteur ; Helen BALDWIN, Auteur ; Aranzazu FERNANDEZ-RIVAS, Auteur ; Carmen MORENO, Auteur ; Celso ARANGO, Auteur ; Christoph U CORRELL, Auteur ; Ilaria BONOLDI, Auteur ; Paolo FUSAR-POLI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.657-673 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Psychosis adolescence childhood clinical high-risk state for psychosis evidence first-episode meta-analysis prediction prevention psychosis risk schizophrenia Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The clinical high-risk state for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm has facilitated the implementation of psychosis prevention into clinical practice; however, advancements in adolescent CHR-P populations are less established. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science database, from inception until 7 October 2019, to identify original studies conducted in CHR-P children and adolescents (mean age <18 years). Findings were systematically appraised around core themes: detection, prognosis and intervention. We performed meta-analyses (employing Q statistics and I (2) test) regarding the proportion of CHR-P subgroups, the prevalence of baseline comorbid mental disorders, the risk of psychosis onset and the type of interventions received at baseline. Quality assessment and publication bias were also analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven articles were included (n = 4,667 CHR-P individuals). Quality of studies ranged from 3.5 to 8 (median 5.5) on a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Detection: Individuals were aged 15.6 ± 1.2 years (51.5% males), mostly (83%) presenting with attenuated positive psychotic symptoms. CHR-P psychometric accuracy improved when caregivers served as additional informants. Comorbid mood (46.4%) and anxiety (31.4%) disorders were highly prevalent. Functioning and cognition were impaired. Neurobiological studies were inconclusive. PROGNOSIS: Risk for psychosis was 10.4% (95%CI: 5.8%-18.1%) at 6 months, 20% (95%CI: 15%-26%) at 12 months, 23% (95%CI: 18%-29%) at 24 months and 23.3% (95%CI: 17.3%-30.7%) at ?36 months. INTERVENTIONS: There was not enough evidence to recommend one specific treatment (including cognitive behavioural therapy) over the others (including control conditions) to prevent the transition to psychosis in this population. Randomised controlled trials suggested that family interventions, cognitive remediation and fish oil supplementation may improve cognition, symptoms and functioning. At baseline, 30% of CHR-P adolescents were prescribed antipsychotics and 60% received psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to detect and formulate a group-level prognosis in adolescents at risk for psychosis. Future interventional research is required. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13322 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=445
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-5 (May 2021) . - p.657-673[article] Annual Research Review: Prevention of psychosis in adolescents - systematic review and meta-analysis of advances in detection, prognosis and intervention [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Ana CATALAN, Auteur ; Gonzalo SALAZAR DE PABLO, Auteur ; Julio VAQUERIZO SERRANO, Auteur ; Pierluca MOSILLO, Auteur ; Helen BALDWIN, Auteur ; Aranzazu FERNANDEZ-RIVAS, Auteur ; Carmen MORENO, Auteur ; Celso ARANGO, Auteur ; Christoph U CORRELL, Auteur ; Ilaria BONOLDI, Auteur ; Paolo FUSAR-POLI, Auteur . - p.657-673.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-5 (May 2021) . - p.657-673
Mots-clés : Psychosis adolescence childhood clinical high-risk state for psychosis evidence first-episode meta-analysis prediction prevention psychosis risk schizophrenia Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The clinical high-risk state for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm has facilitated the implementation of psychosis prevention into clinical practice; however, advancements in adolescent CHR-P populations are less established. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science database, from inception until 7 October 2019, to identify original studies conducted in CHR-P children and adolescents (mean age <18 years). Findings were systematically appraised around core themes: detection, prognosis and intervention. We performed meta-analyses (employing Q statistics and I (2) test) regarding the proportion of CHR-P subgroups, the prevalence of baseline comorbid mental disorders, the risk of psychosis onset and the type of interventions received at baseline. Quality assessment and publication bias were also analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven articles were included (n = 4,667 CHR-P individuals). Quality of studies ranged from 3.5 to 8 (median 5.5) on a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Detection: Individuals were aged 15.6 ± 1.2 years (51.5% males), mostly (83%) presenting with attenuated positive psychotic symptoms. CHR-P psychometric accuracy improved when caregivers served as additional informants. Comorbid mood (46.4%) and anxiety (31.4%) disorders were highly prevalent. Functioning and cognition were impaired. Neurobiological studies were inconclusive. PROGNOSIS: Risk for psychosis was 10.4% (95%CI: 5.8%-18.1%) at 6 months, 20% (95%CI: 15%-26%) at 12 months, 23% (95%CI: 18%-29%) at 24 months and 23.3% (95%CI: 17.3%-30.7%) at ?36 months. INTERVENTIONS: There was not enough evidence to recommend one specific treatment (including cognitive behavioural therapy) over the others (including control conditions) to prevent the transition to psychosis in this population. Randomised controlled trials suggested that family interventions, cognitive remediation and fish oil supplementation may improve cognition, symptoms and functioning. At baseline, 30% of CHR-P adolescents were prescribed antipsychotics and 60% received psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to detect and formulate a group-level prognosis in adolescents at risk for psychosis. Future interventional research is required. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13322 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=445