Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Chelsea La VALLE |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
How do minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder use communicative gestures to complement their spoken language abilities? / Chelsea La VALLE in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 6 (January-December 2021)
[article]
Titre : How do minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder use communicative gestures to complement their spoken language abilities? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Chelsea La VALLE, Auteur ; Karen CHENAUSKY, Auteur ; Helen TAGER-FLUSBERG, Auteur Article en page(s) : 23969415211035065 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder minimally verbal gesture gesture–speech communicative function Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background and aimsPrior work has examined how children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder who are minimally verbal use their spoken language abilities during interactions with others. However, social communication includes other aspects beyond speech. To our knowledge, no studies have examined how minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder are using their gestural communication during social interactions. Such work can provide important insights into how gestures may complement their spoken language abilities.MethodsFifty minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder participated (Mage?=?12.41 years; 38 males). Gestural communication was coded from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. Children (n?=?25) and adolescents (n?=?25) were compared on their production of gestures, gesture–speech combinations, and communicative functions. Communicative functions were also assessed by the type of communication modality: gesture, speech, and gesture–speech to examine the range of communicative functions across different modalities of communication. To explore the role gestures may play the relation between speech utterances and gestural production was investigated.ResultsAnalyses revealed that (1) minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder did not differ in their total number of gestures. The most frequently produced gesture across children and adolescents was a reach gesture, followed by a point gesture (deictic gesture), and then conventional gestures. However, adolescents produced more gesture–speech combinations (reinforcing gesture-speech combinations) and displayed a wider range of communicative functions. (2) Overlap was found in the types of communicative functions expressed across different communication modalities. However, requests were conveyed via gesture more frequently compared to speech or gesture–speech. In contrast, dis/agree/acknowledging and responding to a question posed by the conversational partner was expressed more frequently via speech compared to gesture or gesture–speech. (3) The total number of gestures was negatively associated with total speech utterances after controlling for chronological age, receptive communication ability, and nonverbal IQ.ConclusionsAdolescents may be employing different communication strategies to maintain the conversational exchange and to further clarify the message they want to convey to the conversational partner. Although overlap occurred in communicative functions across gesture, speech, and gesture–speech, nuanced differences emerged in how often they were expressed across different modalities of communication. Given their speech production abilities, gestures may play a compensatory role for some individuals with autism spectrum disorder who are minimally verbal.ImplicationsFindings underscore the importance of assessing multiple modalities of communication to provide a fuller picture of their social communication abilities. Our results identified specific communicative strengths and areas for growth that can be targeted and expanded upon within gesture and speech to optimize social communication development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969415211035065 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=459
in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments > 6 (January-December 2021) . - 23969415211035065[article] How do minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder use communicative gestures to complement their spoken language abilities? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Chelsea La VALLE, Auteur ; Karen CHENAUSKY, Auteur ; Helen TAGER-FLUSBERG, Auteur . - 23969415211035065.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments > 6 (January-December 2021) . - 23969415211035065
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder minimally verbal gesture gesture–speech communicative function Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background and aimsPrior work has examined how children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder who are minimally verbal use their spoken language abilities during interactions with others. However, social communication includes other aspects beyond speech. To our knowledge, no studies have examined how minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder are using their gestural communication during social interactions. Such work can provide important insights into how gestures may complement their spoken language abilities.MethodsFifty minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder participated (Mage?=?12.41 years; 38 males). Gestural communication was coded from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. Children (n?=?25) and adolescents (n?=?25) were compared on their production of gestures, gesture–speech combinations, and communicative functions. Communicative functions were also assessed by the type of communication modality: gesture, speech, and gesture–speech to examine the range of communicative functions across different modalities of communication. To explore the role gestures may play the relation between speech utterances and gestural production was investigated.ResultsAnalyses revealed that (1) minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder did not differ in their total number of gestures. The most frequently produced gesture across children and adolescents was a reach gesture, followed by a point gesture (deictic gesture), and then conventional gestures. However, adolescents produced more gesture–speech combinations (reinforcing gesture-speech combinations) and displayed a wider range of communicative functions. (2) Overlap was found in the types of communicative functions expressed across different communication modalities. However, requests were conveyed via gesture more frequently compared to speech or gesture–speech. In contrast, dis/agree/acknowledging and responding to a question posed by the conversational partner was expressed more frequently via speech compared to gesture or gesture–speech. (3) The total number of gestures was negatively associated with total speech utterances after controlling for chronological age, receptive communication ability, and nonverbal IQ.ConclusionsAdolescents may be employing different communication strategies to maintain the conversational exchange and to further clarify the message they want to convey to the conversational partner. Although overlap occurred in communicative functions across gesture, speech, and gesture–speech, nuanced differences emerged in how often they were expressed across different modalities of communication. Given their speech production abilities, gestures may play a compensatory role for some individuals with autism spectrum disorder who are minimally verbal.ImplicationsFindings underscore the importance of assessing multiple modalities of communication to provide a fuller picture of their social communication abilities. Our results identified specific communicative strengths and areas for growth that can be targeted and expanded upon within gesture and speech to optimize social communication development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969415211035065 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=459