Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Adaptive ability'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Assessing general cognitive and adaptive abilities in adults with Down syndrome: a systematic review / S. HAMBURG in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 11-1 (December 2019)
[article]
Titre : Assessing general cognitive and adaptive abilities in adults with Down syndrome: a systematic review Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : S. HAMBURG, Auteur ; B. LOWE, Auteur ; C. M. STARTIN, Auteur ; C. PADILLA, Auteur ; A. COPPUS, Auteur ; W. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; J. FORTEA, Auteur ; S. ZAMAN, Auteur ; E. HEAD, Auteur ; B. L. HANDEN, Auteur ; I. LOTT, Auteur ; W. SONG, Auteur ; A. STRYDOM, Auteur Article en page(s) : 20 p. Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Ab Adaptive ability Adaptive behaviour Cognition Down syndrome General ability Iq Intelligence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Measures of general cognitive and adaptive ability in adults with Down syndrome (DS) used by previous studies vary substantially. This review summarises the different ability measures used previously, focusing on tests of intelligence quotient (IQ) and adaptive behaviour (AB), and where possible examines floor effects and differences between DS subpopulations. We aimed to use information regarding existing measures to provide recommendations for individual researchers and the DS research community. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting IQ test data met inclusion for this review, with 17 different IQ tests used. Twelve of these IQ tests were used in only one study while five were used in two different studies. Eleven studies reporting AB test data met inclusion for this review, with seven different AB tests used. The only AB scales to be used by more than one study were the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS; used by three studies) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale 2nd Edition (VABS-II; used by two studies). A variety of additional factors were identified which make comparison of test scores between studies problematic, including different score types provided between studies (e.g. raw scores compared to age-equivalent scores) and different participant inclusion criteria (e.g. whether individuals with cognitive decline were excluded). Floor effects were common for IQ tests (particularly for standardised test scores). Data exists to suggest that floor effects may be minimised by the use of raw test scores rather than standardised test scores. Raw scores may, therefore, be particularly useful in longitudinal studies to track change in cognitive ability over time. CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing general ability in adults with DS are likely to benefit from the use of both IQ and AB scales. The DS research community may benefit from the development of reporting standards for IQ and AB data, and from the sharing of raw study data enabling further in-depth investigation of issues highlighted by this review. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-019-9279-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=409
in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 11-1 (December 2019) . - 20 p.[article] Assessing general cognitive and adaptive abilities in adults with Down syndrome: a systematic review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / S. HAMBURG, Auteur ; B. LOWE, Auteur ; C. M. STARTIN, Auteur ; C. PADILLA, Auteur ; A. COPPUS, Auteur ; W. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; J. FORTEA, Auteur ; S. ZAMAN, Auteur ; E. HEAD, Auteur ; B. L. HANDEN, Auteur ; I. LOTT, Auteur ; W. SONG, Auteur ; A. STRYDOM, Auteur . - 20 p.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 11-1 (December 2019) . - 20 p.
Mots-clés : Ab Adaptive ability Adaptive behaviour Cognition Down syndrome General ability Iq Intelligence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Measures of general cognitive and adaptive ability in adults with Down syndrome (DS) used by previous studies vary substantially. This review summarises the different ability measures used previously, focusing on tests of intelligence quotient (IQ) and adaptive behaviour (AB), and where possible examines floor effects and differences between DS subpopulations. We aimed to use information regarding existing measures to provide recommendations for individual researchers and the DS research community. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting IQ test data met inclusion for this review, with 17 different IQ tests used. Twelve of these IQ tests were used in only one study while five were used in two different studies. Eleven studies reporting AB test data met inclusion for this review, with seven different AB tests used. The only AB scales to be used by more than one study were the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS; used by three studies) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale 2nd Edition (VABS-II; used by two studies). A variety of additional factors were identified which make comparison of test scores between studies problematic, including different score types provided between studies (e.g. raw scores compared to age-equivalent scores) and different participant inclusion criteria (e.g. whether individuals with cognitive decline were excluded). Floor effects were common for IQ tests (particularly for standardised test scores). Data exists to suggest that floor effects may be minimised by the use of raw test scores rather than standardised test scores. Raw scores may, therefore, be particularly useful in longitudinal studies to track change in cognitive ability over time. CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing general ability in adults with DS are likely to benefit from the use of both IQ and AB scales. The DS research community may benefit from the development of reporting standards for IQ and AB data, and from the sharing of raw study data enabling further in-depth investigation of issues highlighted by this review. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-019-9279-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=409