Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Descriptors Electronic-data-collection Discrete-trial-training Autism'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
A comparison of electronic to traditional pen-and-paper data collection in discrete trial training for children with autism / Jonathan TARBOX in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4-1 (January-March 2010)
[article]
Titre : A comparison of electronic to traditional pen-and-paper data collection in discrete trial training for children with autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jonathan TARBOX, Auteur ; Doreen GRANPEESHEH, Auteur ; Arthur E. WILKE, Auteur ; Rachel S. FINDEL-PYLES, Auteur ; Ryan M. BERGSTROM, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.65-75 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Descriptors Electronic-data-collection Discrete-trial-training Autism Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is considerable empirical evidence that demonstrates that early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) produces substantial improvements in young children with autism. A central feature of this treatment approach is the reliance on continuous measurement of child performance during all treatment hours (20–40 h per week) to ensure an objective and quantitative analysis of behavior. Pen-and-paper data collection is standard practice in service delivery agencies. An alternative is to collect data via an electronic format, however little research has been done on electronic data collection in these settings. The purpose of this study was to compare mTrial®, a program that allows therapists to record, store, and report discrete trial and other behavior data for students on a personal data assistant, to traditional pen-and-paper data, in terms of the accuracy of data collected and the time required to do it. Results suggest that both formats are of approximately equal accuracy but that traditional data collection is faster. Implications of the two data collection methods for data storage and analysis are also discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2009.07.008 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=887
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 4-1 (January-March 2010) . - p.65-75[article] A comparison of electronic to traditional pen-and-paper data collection in discrete trial training for children with autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jonathan TARBOX, Auteur ; Doreen GRANPEESHEH, Auteur ; Arthur E. WILKE, Auteur ; Rachel S. FINDEL-PYLES, Auteur ; Ryan M. BERGSTROM, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.65-75.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 4-1 (January-March 2010) . - p.65-75
Mots-clés : Descriptors Electronic-data-collection Discrete-trial-training Autism Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is considerable empirical evidence that demonstrates that early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) produces substantial improvements in young children with autism. A central feature of this treatment approach is the reliance on continuous measurement of child performance during all treatment hours (20–40 h per week) to ensure an objective and quantitative analysis of behavior. Pen-and-paper data collection is standard practice in service delivery agencies. An alternative is to collect data via an electronic format, however little research has been done on electronic data collection in these settings. The purpose of this study was to compare mTrial®, a program that allows therapists to record, store, and report discrete trial and other behavior data for students on a personal data assistant, to traditional pen-and-paper data, in terms of the accuracy of data collected and the time required to do it. Results suggest that both formats are of approximately equal accuracy but that traditional data collection is faster. Implications of the two data collection methods for data storage and analysis are also discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2009.07.008 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=887