Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
5 recherche sur le mot-clé 'recidivism'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
The relationship between juvenile psychopathic traits, delinquency and (violent) recidivism: A meta-analysis / Jessica J. ASSCHER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52-11 (November 2011)
[article]
Titre : The relationship between juvenile psychopathic traits, delinquency and (violent) recidivism: A meta-analysis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jessica J. ASSCHER, Auteur ; Eveline S. VAN VUGT, Auteur ; Geert Jan J.M. STAMS, Auteur ; Maja DEKOVIC, Auteur ; Veroni I. EICHELSHEIM, Auteur ; Sarah YOUSFI, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.1134-1143 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Psychopathy juvenile delinquency recidivism meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A meta-analysis of k = 53 studies containing 60 non-overlapping samples and 10,073 participants was conducted to investigate whether psychopathy was associated with delinquency and (violent) recidivism in juveniles. The results showed that psychopathy was moderately associated with delinquency, general recidivism, and violent recidivism. Moderator effects revealed that various study and participant characteristics influenced the strength of the association between psychopathy, delinquency, and (violent) recidivism. It was concluded that screening for the (early) detection of psychopathy is important, as delinquent behavior and recidivism can be predicted from psychopathy as early as the transition from middle childhood to adolescence. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02412.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=144
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-11 (November 2011) . - p.1134-1143[article] The relationship between juvenile psychopathic traits, delinquency and (violent) recidivism: A meta-analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jessica J. ASSCHER, Auteur ; Eveline S. VAN VUGT, Auteur ; Geert Jan J.M. STAMS, Auteur ; Maja DEKOVIC, Auteur ; Veroni I. EICHELSHEIM, Auteur ; Sarah YOUSFI, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.1134-1143.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-11 (November 2011) . - p.1134-1143
Mots-clés : Psychopathy juvenile delinquency recidivism meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A meta-analysis of k = 53 studies containing 60 non-overlapping samples and 10,073 participants was conducted to investigate whether psychopathy was associated with delinquency and (violent) recidivism in juveniles. The results showed that psychopathy was moderately associated with delinquency, general recidivism, and violent recidivism. Moderator effects revealed that various study and participant characteristics influenced the strength of the association between psychopathy, delinquency, and (violent) recidivism. It was concluded that screening for the (early) detection of psychopathy is important, as delinquent behavior and recidivism can be predicted from psychopathy as early as the transition from middle childhood to adolescence. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02412.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=144 Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior? / Emily L. ROBERTSON in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62-2 (February 2021)
[article]
Titre : Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Emily L. ROBERTSON, Auteur ; Paul J. FRICK, Auteur ; James V. RAY, Auteur ; Laura C. THORNTON, Auteur ; Tina D. WALL MYERS, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur ; Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p.212-222 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Callous-unemotional (CU) traits formal processing juvenile justice system recidivism treatment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Research suggests that callous-unemotional (CU) traits, a recent addition to psychiatric classification of serious conduct problems, may moderate the influence of a number of contextual factors (e.g., parenting, deviant peer influence) on an adolescent's adjustment. The current study sought to replicate past research showing that formal processing through the juvenile justice system increases recidivism and tested the novel hypothesis that CU traits would moderate the relationship between processing decision and future antisocial behavior. METHODS: A diverse sample of first-time male offenders (N = 1,216; M age = 15.12, SD = 1.29) in three regions of the United States was assessed within 6 weeks of their first arrest and then at 6-month intervals for 36 months. RESULTS: Compared to those who were informally processed (i.e., diverted), adolescents formally processed through the court were at a higher risk of self-reported offending and rearrests as measured by official records, after controlling for preexisting risk factors. However, baseline CU traits moderated this association such that those with high CU traits reported offending at high rates across the subsequent three years regardless of how the juvenile justice system processed their case. CONCLUSIONS: CU traits are important to psychiatric classification for designating a subgroup of antisocial youth who may respond differently to contextual influences, including being less susceptible to the negative effects of juvenile justice system involvement. The public health significance of this moderation is significant by suggesting that previous estimates of the harmful impact of formal processing by the juvenile justice system may underestimate its impact, given that the majority of arrested adolescents have normative levels of CU traits. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13266 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=440
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-2 (February 2021) . - p.212-222[article] Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Emily L. ROBERTSON, Auteur ; Paul J. FRICK, Auteur ; James V. RAY, Auteur ; Laura C. THORNTON, Auteur ; Tina D. WALL MYERS, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur ; Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur . - 2021 . - p.212-222.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-2 (February 2021) . - p.212-222
Mots-clés : Callous-unemotional (CU) traits formal processing juvenile justice system recidivism treatment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Research suggests that callous-unemotional (CU) traits, a recent addition to psychiatric classification of serious conduct problems, may moderate the influence of a number of contextual factors (e.g., parenting, deviant peer influence) on an adolescent's adjustment. The current study sought to replicate past research showing that formal processing through the juvenile justice system increases recidivism and tested the novel hypothesis that CU traits would moderate the relationship between processing decision and future antisocial behavior. METHODS: A diverse sample of first-time male offenders (N = 1,216; M age = 15.12, SD = 1.29) in three regions of the United States was assessed within 6 weeks of their first arrest and then at 6-month intervals for 36 months. RESULTS: Compared to those who were informally processed (i.e., diverted), adolescents formally processed through the court were at a higher risk of self-reported offending and rearrests as measured by official records, after controlling for preexisting risk factors. However, baseline CU traits moderated this association such that those with high CU traits reported offending at high rates across the subsequent three years regardless of how the juvenile justice system processed their case. CONCLUSIONS: CU traits are important to psychiatric classification for designating a subgroup of antisocial youth who may respond differently to contextual influences, including being less susceptible to the negative effects of juvenile justice system involvement. The public health significance of this moderation is significant by suggesting that previous estimates of the harmful impact of formal processing by the juvenile justice system may underestimate its impact, given that the majority of arrested adolescents have normative levels of CU traits. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13266 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=440 Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood / Amélie PETITCLERC in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-3 (March 2013)
[article]
Titre : Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amélie PETITCLERC, Auteur ; Uberto GATTI, Auteur ; Frank VITARO, Auteur ; Richard E. TREMBLAY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.291-297 Mots-clés : Criminal behavior violence recidivism penal justice juvenile offenders Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The juvenile justice system’s interventions are expected to help reduce recidivism. However, previous studies suggest that official processing in juvenile court fails to reduce adolescents’ criminal behavior in the following year. Longer term effects have not yet been investigated with a rigorous method. This study used propensity score matching to assess the impact of juvenile court processing into young adulthood. Method: Participants were part of a prospective longitudinal study of 1,037 boys from low- socioeconomic areas of Montreal, followed from ages 6–25 years. During their adolescence, 176 participants were processed in juvenile court, whereas 225 were arrested, but not sent to court. Propensity score matching was used to balance the group of participants exposed to juvenile court and the unexposed comparison group on 14 preadolescent child, family and peer characteristics. The two groups were compared on their official adult criminal outcomes. Results: The risk of conviction for an adult offence was 50.0% for court-processed participants compared with 24.3% for their matched counterparts, OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.80–5.44. Court-processed participants committed an average of 0.39 violent crimes, compared with 0.15 for their matched counterparts; Poisson model IRR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.39–4.87. They also committed an average of 2.38 nonviolent crimes, compared to 1.30 for their matched counterparts, IRR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.19–2.93. Conclusions: Rather than decreasing recidivism, juvenile court intervention increased both violent and nonviolent future crimes. Along with previous studies, this study highlights a pressing need for more research and knowledge transfer about effective interventions to reduce recidivism among youths who commit crime. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02616.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=191
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-3 (March 2013) . - p.291-297[article] Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amélie PETITCLERC, Auteur ; Uberto GATTI, Auteur ; Frank VITARO, Auteur ; Richard E. TREMBLAY, Auteur . - p.291-297.
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-3 (March 2013) . - p.291-297
Mots-clés : Criminal behavior violence recidivism penal justice juvenile offenders Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The juvenile justice system’s interventions are expected to help reduce recidivism. However, previous studies suggest that official processing in juvenile court fails to reduce adolescents’ criminal behavior in the following year. Longer term effects have not yet been investigated with a rigorous method. This study used propensity score matching to assess the impact of juvenile court processing into young adulthood. Method: Participants were part of a prospective longitudinal study of 1,037 boys from low- socioeconomic areas of Montreal, followed from ages 6–25 years. During their adolescence, 176 participants were processed in juvenile court, whereas 225 were arrested, but not sent to court. Propensity score matching was used to balance the group of participants exposed to juvenile court and the unexposed comparison group on 14 preadolescent child, family and peer characteristics. The two groups were compared on their official adult criminal outcomes. Results: The risk of conviction for an adult offence was 50.0% for court-processed participants compared with 24.3% for their matched counterparts, OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.80–5.44. Court-processed participants committed an average of 0.39 violent crimes, compared with 0.15 for their matched counterparts; Poisson model IRR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.39–4.87. They also committed an average of 2.38 nonviolent crimes, compared to 1.30 for their matched counterparts, IRR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.19–2.93. Conclusions: Rather than decreasing recidivism, juvenile court intervention increased both violent and nonviolent future crimes. Along with previous studies, this study highlights a pressing need for more research and knowledge transfer about effective interventions to reduce recidivism among youths who commit crime. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02616.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=191 Criminal Behavior and School Discipline in Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth with Autism / A. M. SLAUGHTER in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-6 (June 2019)
[article]
Titre : Criminal Behavior and School Discipline in Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth with Autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : A. M. SLAUGHTER, Auteur ; S. HEIN, Auteur ; J. H. HONG, Auteur ; S. S. MIRE, Auteur ; E. L. GRIGORENKO, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2268-2280 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Crime Discipline Recidivism School Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The objective was to delineate the prevalence of criminal behavior and school discipline in juvenile justice-involved youth (JJY) with autism. A sample of 143 JJY with autism was matched to comparison groups of JJY without a special education classification, JJY with learning disabilities, and JJY with other special educational needs (N = 572). Results showed that JJY with autism committed significantly fewer property crimes. With regard to school discipline, JJY with autism were least likely to receive policy violations, out-of-school suspensions, and in-school suspensions. Finally, regardless of special education classification, JJY who had a history of fighting in school were more likely to recidivate. Our results suggest that JJY with autism are not more likely to commit crimes compared to JJY without SEN. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03883-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=400
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-6 (June 2019) . - p.2268-2280[article] Criminal Behavior and School Discipline in Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth with Autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / A. M. SLAUGHTER, Auteur ; S. HEIN, Auteur ; J. H. HONG, Auteur ; S. S. MIRE, Auteur ; E. L. GRIGORENKO, Auteur . - p.2268-2280.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-6 (June 2019) . - p.2268-2280
Mots-clés : Autism Crime Discipline Recidivism School Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The objective was to delineate the prevalence of criminal behavior and school discipline in juvenile justice-involved youth (JJY) with autism. A sample of 143 JJY with autism was matched to comparison groups of JJY without a special education classification, JJY with learning disabilities, and JJY with other special educational needs (N = 572). Results showed that JJY with autism committed significantly fewer property crimes. With regard to school discipline, JJY with autism were least likely to receive policy violations, out-of-school suspensions, and in-school suspensions. Finally, regardless of special education classification, JJY who had a history of fighting in school were more likely to recidivate. Our results suggest that JJY with autism are not more likely to commit crimes compared to JJY without SEN. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03883-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=400 Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest / Elizabeth CAUFFMAN in Development and Psychopathology, 33-2 (May 2021)
[article]
Titre : Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur ; Jordan BEARDSLEE, Auteur ; Adam FINE, Auteur ; Paul J. FRICK, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p.700-713 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescence diversion inverse probability weighting juvenile justice policy processing decision recidivism risk-taking social policy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current study advances past research by studying the impact of juvenile justice decision making with a geographically and ethnically diverse sample (N = 1,216) of adolescent boys (ages 13-17 years) for the 5 years following their first arrest. Importantly, all youth in the study were arrested for an eligible offense of moderate severity (e.g., assault, theft) to evaluate whether the initial decision to formally (i.e., sentenced before a judge) or informally (i.e., diverted to community service) process the youth led to differences in outcomes. The current study also advanced past research by using a statistical approach that controlled for a host of potential preexisting vulnerabilities that could influence both the processing decision and the youth's outcomes. Our findings indicated that youth who were formally processed during adolescence were more likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be incarcerated, engaged in more violence, reported a greater affiliation with delinquent peers, reported lower school enrollment, were less likely to graduate high school within 5 years, reported less ability to suppress aggression, and had lower perceptions of opportunities than informally processed youth. Importantly, these findings were not moderated by the age of the youth at his first arrest or his race and ethnicity. These results have important implications for juvenile justice policy by indicating that formally processing youth not only is costly, but it can reduce public safety and reduce the adolescent's later potential contributions to society. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095457942000200x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=444
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-2 (May 2021) . - p.700-713[article] Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur ; Jordan BEARDSLEE, Auteur ; Adam FINE, Auteur ; Paul J. FRICK, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur . - 2021 . - p.700-713.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-2 (May 2021) . - p.700-713
Mots-clés : adolescence diversion inverse probability weighting juvenile justice policy processing decision recidivism risk-taking social policy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current study advances past research by studying the impact of juvenile justice decision making with a geographically and ethnically diverse sample (N = 1,216) of adolescent boys (ages 13-17 years) for the 5 years following their first arrest. Importantly, all youth in the study were arrested for an eligible offense of moderate severity (e.g., assault, theft) to evaluate whether the initial decision to formally (i.e., sentenced before a judge) or informally (i.e., diverted to community service) process the youth led to differences in outcomes. The current study also advanced past research by using a statistical approach that controlled for a host of potential preexisting vulnerabilities that could influence both the processing decision and the youth's outcomes. Our findings indicated that youth who were formally processed during adolescence were more likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be incarcerated, engaged in more violence, reported a greater affiliation with delinquent peers, reported lower school enrollment, were less likely to graduate high school within 5 years, reported less ability to suppress aggression, and had lower perceptions of opportunities than informally processed youth. Importantly, these findings were not moderated by the age of the youth at his first arrest or his race and ethnicity. These results have important implications for juvenile justice policy by indicating that formally processing youth not only is costly, but it can reduce public safety and reduce the adolescent's later potential contributions to society. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095457942000200x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=444