Brief Report: The Impact of Changing from DSM-IV ‘Asperger’s’ to DSM-5 ‘Autistic Spectrum Disorder’ Diagnostic Labels on Stigma and Treatment Attitudes / Jeneva L. OHAN in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-10 (October 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-10 (October 2015) . - p.3384-3389 Titre : Brief Report: The Impact of Changing from DSM-IV ‘Asperger’s’ to DSM-5 ‘Autistic Spectrum Disorder’ Diagnostic Labels on Stigma and Treatment Attitudes Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jeneva L. OHAN, Auteur ; Sarah E. ELLEFSON, Auteur ; Patrick W. CORRIGAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3384-3389 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Stigma  Asperger’s disorder  Autistic spectrum disorder  Labels Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In the DSM-5, ‘Asperger’s Disorder’ was incorporated into ‘Autistic Spectrum Disorder’ (ASD). One key concern in this change has been that the ASD label will increase negative attitudes relative to the Asperger’s label. To test this, we asked 465 American adults to read a vignette describing a child with autistic symptoms that included an ASD label, an Asperger’s label, or no label, and rate their stigma and treatment attitudes (help-seeking and perceived effectiveness). Contrary to predictions, label did not impact stigma. Label did impact treatment attitudes, with greater help-seeking and perceived treatment effectiveness for both Asperger’s and ASD labels. In sum, concern that the ASD label will increase negative perceptions, at least amongst the general public, is not supported. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2485-7 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=268 [article] Brief Report: The Impact of Changing from DSM-IV ‘Asperger’s’ to DSM-5 ‘Autistic Spectrum Disorder’ Diagnostic Labels on Stigma and Treatment Attitudes [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jeneva L. OHAN, Auteur ; Sarah E. ELLEFSON, Auteur ; Patrick W. CORRIGAN, Auteur . - p.3384-3389. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-10 (October 2015) . - p.3384-3389 Mots-clés : Stigma  Asperger’s disorder  Autistic spectrum disorder  Labels Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In the DSM-5, ‘Asperger’s Disorder’ was incorporated into ‘Autistic Spectrum Disorder’ (ASD). One key concern in this change has been that the ASD label will increase negative attitudes relative to the Asperger’s label. To test this, we asked 465 American adults to read a vignette describing a child with autistic symptoms that included an ASD label, an Asperger’s label, or no label, and rate their stigma and treatment attitudes (help-seeking and perceived effectiveness). Contrary to predictions, label did not impact stigma. Label did impact treatment attitudes, with greater help-seeking and perceived treatment effectiveness for both Asperger’s and ASD labels. In sum, concern that the ASD label will increase negative perceptions, at least amongst the general public, is not supported. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2485-7 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=268

The effect of childhood maltreatment on adult survivors' parental reflective function, and attachment of their children: A systematic review / Elmie JANSE VAN RENSBURG in Development and Psychopathology, 36-3 (August 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 36-3 (August 2024) . - p.1166-1180 Titre : The effect of childhood maltreatment on adult survivors' parental reflective function, and attachment of their children: A systematic review Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Elmie JANSE VAN RENSBURG, Auteur ; Alix WOOLARD, Auteur ; Nicole T. M. HILL, Auteur ; Carol REID, Auteur ; Helen MILROY, Auteur ; Jeneva L. OHAN, Auteur ; Ashleigh LIN, Auteur ; Catherine CHAMBERLAIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1166-1180 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : attachment  child maltreatment  mentalizing  parenting  reflective function Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:Parental reflective function (PRF) is a candidate mechanism in the transmission of intergenerational trauma. This systematic review examined (1) the association between parental history of childhood maltreatment and PRF, (2) how PRF relates to attachment in children of parent survivors, and (3) whether PRF moderates the association between parental maltreatment history and child attachment.Methods:Ten databases were searched (from inception to 10th November 2021). Inclusion criteria were primary study, quantitative, parent participants, measures of childhood maltreatment, and postnatal PRF. Exclusion criteria were qualitative, intervention follow-up, gray literature, or a review study. Risk of bias was assessed using recommended tools. Data were narratively synthesized.Results:One-thousand-and-two articles were retrieved, of which eleven met inclusion criteria (N = 974 participants). Four studies found a significant association between parental childhood maltreatment and disrupted PRF, six did not, one found mixed results. One study reported the association between childhood maltreatment and attachment (nonsignificant results).Discussion:There is no clear evidence PRF is routinely disrupted in parent survivors, though there is high heterogeneity in studies. Future research should standardize design to better understand whether PRF is a candidate mechanism in intergenerational trauma.Other:PROSPERO CRD42020223594 En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000391 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=538 [article] The effect of childhood maltreatment on adult survivors' parental reflective function, and attachment of their children: A systematic review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Elmie JANSE VAN RENSBURG, Auteur ; Alix WOOLARD, Auteur ; Nicole T. M. HILL, Auteur ; Carol REID, Auteur ; Helen MILROY, Auteur ; Jeneva L. OHAN, Auteur ; Ashleigh LIN, Auteur ; Catherine CHAMBERLAIN, Auteur . - p.1166-1180. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 36-3 (August 2024) . - p.1166-1180 Mots-clés : attachment  child maltreatment  mentalizing  parenting  reflective function Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:Parental reflective function (PRF) is a candidate mechanism in the transmission of intergenerational trauma. This systematic review examined (1) the association between parental history of childhood maltreatment and PRF, (2) how PRF relates to attachment in children of parent survivors, and (3) whether PRF moderates the association between parental maltreatment history and child attachment.Methods:Ten databases were searched (from inception to 10th November 2021). Inclusion criteria were primary study, quantitative, parent participants, measures of childhood maltreatment, and postnatal PRF. Exclusion criteria were qualitative, intervention follow-up, gray literature, or a review study. Risk of bias was assessed using recommended tools. Data were narratively synthesized.Results:One-thousand-and-two articles were retrieved, of which eleven met inclusion criteria (N = 974 participants). Four studies found a significant association between parental childhood maltreatment and disrupted PRF, six did not, one found mixed results. One study reported the association between childhood maltreatment and attachment (nonsignificant results).Discussion:There is no clear evidence PRF is routinely disrupted in parent survivors, though there is high heterogeneity in studies. Future research should standardize design to better understand whether PRF is a candidate mechanism in intergenerational trauma.Other:PROSPERO CRD42020223594 En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000391 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=538

Why Is There a Gender Gap in Children Presenting for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Services? / Jeneva L. OHAN in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38-5 (September-October 2009)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 38-5 (September-October 2009) . - p.650-660 Titre : Why Is There a Gender Gap in Children Presenting for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Services? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jeneva L. OHAN, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : p.650-660 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study addressed why girls are less likely to be referred for mental health services for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) than boys. Ninety-six parents of children with elevated ADHD symptoms and 140 elementary school teachers read vignettes about children with ADHD. Half of the participants read vignettes with boys' names, and half read the same vignettes but with girls' names. Participants then rated their likeliness to seek or recommend services for the child in each vignette. Parents and teachers were less likely to seek or recommend services for girls than boys with ADHD, but results did not support the hypothesis that this is because girls are less disruptive than boys. Rather, differences in service seeking were explained by the fact that parents and teachers believed that learning assistance is less effective for girls than boys with ADHD. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410903103627 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=827 [article] Why Is There a Gender Gap in Children Presenting for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Services? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jeneva L. OHAN, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.650-660. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 38-5 (September-October 2009) . - p.650-660 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study addressed why girls are less likely to be referred for mental health services for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) than boys. Ninety-six parents of children with elevated ADHD symptoms and 140 elementary school teachers read vignettes about children with ADHD. Half of the participants read vignettes with boys' names, and half read the same vignettes but with girls' names. Participants then rated their likeliness to seek or recommend services for the child in each vignette. Parents and teachers were less likely to seek or recommend services for girls than boys with ADHD, but results did not support the hypothesis that this is because girls are less disruptive than boys. Rather, differences in service seeking were explained by the fact that parents and teachers believed that learning assistance is less effective for girls than boys with ADHD. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410903103627 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=827

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)