
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur David LAGNADO |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Judgments of Cause and Blame: Sensitivity to Intentionality in Asperger’s Syndrome / Shelley CHANNON in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41-11 (November 2011)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Judgments of Cause and Blame: Sensitivity to Intentionality in Asperger’s Syndrome Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Shelley CHANNON, Auteur ; David LAGNADO, Auteur ; Sian FITZPATRICK, Auteur ; Helena DRURY, Auteur ; Isabelle TAYLOR, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.1534-1542 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Moral judgment Mentalising Theory of mind Causal inference Asperger’s syndrome Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Sensitivity to intentionality in people with Asperger’s syndrome (AS) and matched controls was investigated using two scenario-based tasks. The first compared intentional and unintentional human actions and physical events leading to the same negative outcomes. The second compared intentional actions that varied in their subjective and objective likelihood of bringing about a negative outcome. Whilst adults with AS did not differ from controls in their judgments of causality, or in their blame judgments in relation to non-mentalistic factors, they showed heightened sensitivity to mentalistic considerations in their attributions of blame. They made greater differentiation than controls between intentional and unintentional actions, and also between actions that the protagonists believed to be likely versus unlikely to lead to negative consequences. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1180-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=147
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 41-11 (November 2011) . - p.1534-1542[article] Judgments of Cause and Blame: Sensitivity to Intentionality in Asperger’s Syndrome [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Shelley CHANNON, Auteur ; David LAGNADO, Auteur ; Sian FITZPATRICK, Auteur ; Helena DRURY, Auteur ; Isabelle TAYLOR, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.1534-1542.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 41-11 (November 2011) . - p.1534-1542
Mots-clés : Moral judgment Mentalising Theory of mind Causal inference Asperger’s syndrome Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Sensitivity to intentionality in people with Asperger’s syndrome (AS) and matched controls was investigated using two scenario-based tasks. The first compared intentional and unintentional human actions and physical events leading to the same negative outcomes. The second compared intentional actions that varied in their subjective and objective likelihood of bringing about a negative outcome. Whilst adults with AS did not differ from controls in their judgments of causality, or in their blame judgments in relation to non-mentalistic factors, they showed heightened sensitivity to mentalistic considerations in their attributions of blame. They made greater differentiation than controls between intentional and unintentional actions, and also between actions that the protagonists believed to be likely versus unlikely to lead to negative consequences. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1180-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=147 Punishment and Sympathy Judgments: Is the Quality of Mercy Strained in Asperger’s Syndrome? / Shelley CHANNON in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40-10 (October 2010)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Punishment and Sympathy Judgments: Is the Quality of Mercy Strained in Asperger’s Syndrome? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Shelley CHANNON, Auteur ; Sian FITZPATRICK, Auteur ; Helena DRURY, Auteur ; Isabelle TAYLOR, Auteur ; David LAGNADO, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.1219-1226 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Moral-judgment Mentalising Theory-of-mind Empathy Sympathy Asperger’s-syndrome Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined reasoning about wrongdoing in people with Asperger’s syndrome (AS) and matched healthy controls in relation to car accident scenarios. The two groups made similar judgments with respect to degree of driver negligence for both fines imposed and sympathy ratings. They also made similar judgments of fines in relation to the type of justification given for the drivers’ actions. However, the AS group differentiated more in sympathy judgments relating to good and poor justifications. The AS group thus appeared to show preserved judgment with respect to compensation and sympathy for the victim and fines for the driver, but expressed less sympathy towards drivers with poor justifications for their actions. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0980-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=110
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 40-10 (October 2010) . - p.1219-1226[article] Punishment and Sympathy Judgments: Is the Quality of Mercy Strained in Asperger’s Syndrome? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Shelley CHANNON, Auteur ; Sian FITZPATRICK, Auteur ; Helena DRURY, Auteur ; Isabelle TAYLOR, Auteur ; David LAGNADO, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.1219-1226.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 40-10 (October 2010) . - p.1219-1226
Mots-clés : Moral-judgment Mentalising Theory-of-mind Empathy Sympathy Asperger’s-syndrome Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined reasoning about wrongdoing in people with Asperger’s syndrome (AS) and matched healthy controls in relation to car accident scenarios. The two groups made similar judgments with respect to degree of driver negligence for both fines imposed and sympathy ratings. They also made similar judgments of fines in relation to the type of justification given for the drivers’ actions. However, the AS group differentiated more in sympathy judgments relating to good and poor justifications. The AS group thus appeared to show preserved judgment with respect to compensation and sympathy for the victim and fines for the driver, but expressed less sympathy towards drivers with poor justifications for their actions. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0980-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=110