
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Jeewon CHEONG
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheDimensions of callousness in early childhood: Links to problem behavior and family intervention effectiveness / Luke W. HYDE in Development and Psychopathology, 25-2 (May 2013)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Dimensions of callousness in early childhood: Links to problem behavior and family intervention effectiveness Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Luke W. HYDE, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Frances E.M. GARDNER, Auteur ; Jeewon CHEONG, Auteur ; Thomas J. DISHION, Auteur ; Melvin N. WILSON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.347-363 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined dimensions of callous behaviors in early childhood and the role of these behaviors in the development of conduct problems, as well as responsiveness to a family-centered preventative intervention. Caregiver reports of callous behaviors were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Problem behavior was examined using within- and cross-informant reports of these behaviors. Parenting was measured using observational methods within the context of a randomized control trial of the Family Check-Up with a sample of 731 ethnically diverse boys and girls (followed from ages 2 to 4) at high risk for later conduct problems. Results demonstrated that a measure of deceitful–callous (DC) behaviors had acceptable factor loadings and internal consistency at ages 3 and 4. DC behaviors at age 3 predicted problem behavior concurrently and longitudinally within and across informant. However, DC behaviors did not reduce the effectiveness of the family preventative intervention. These findings have implications for our understanding of behaviors that may precede later callous–unemotional traits and for our understanding of the development and prevention of early starting conduct problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412001101 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=199
in Development and Psychopathology > 25-2 (May 2013) . - p.347-363[article] Dimensions of callousness in early childhood: Links to problem behavior and family intervention effectiveness [texte imprimé] / Luke W. HYDE, Auteur ; Daniel S. SHAW, Auteur ; Frances E.M. GARDNER, Auteur ; Jeewon CHEONG, Auteur ; Thomas J. DISHION, Auteur ; Melvin N. WILSON, Auteur . - p.347-363.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 25-2 (May 2013) . - p.347-363
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined dimensions of callous behaviors in early childhood and the role of these behaviors in the development of conduct problems, as well as responsiveness to a family-centered preventative intervention. Caregiver reports of callous behaviors were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Problem behavior was examined using within- and cross-informant reports of these behaviors. Parenting was measured using observational methods within the context of a randomized control trial of the Family Check-Up with a sample of 731 ethnically diverse boys and girls (followed from ages 2 to 4) at high risk for later conduct problems. Results demonstrated that a measure of deceitful–callous (DC) behaviors had acceptable factor loadings and internal consistency at ages 3 and 4. DC behaviors at age 3 predicted problem behavior concurrently and longitudinally within and across informant. However, DC behaviors did not reduce the effectiveness of the family preventative intervention. These findings have implications for our understanding of behaviors that may precede later callous–unemotional traits and for our understanding of the development and prevention of early starting conduct problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412001101 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=199 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of environmental disadvantage on youth delayed reward discounting / Julia W. FELTON in Development and Psychopathology, 38-2 (May 2026)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of environmental disadvantage on youth delayed reward discounting Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Julia W. FELTON, Auteur ; Geoffrey KAHN, Auteur ; Jaclyn JOHNSON, Auteur ; Hira ALI, Auteur ; Souad SALEH, Auteur ; Nadya HABIB, Auteur ; Brion MAHER, Auteur ; Justin C. STRICKLAND, Auteur ; Jeewon CHEONG, Auteur ; Richard YI, Auteur ; Jill A. RABINOWITZ, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.945-960 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescents adversity children delay discounting environment stress Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Delayed reward discounting (DRD), the tendency to prefer smaller rewards available immediately relative to larger rewards available after a delay, is associated with numerous health outcomes across the lifespan. Emerging literature points to the central role of early environments, specifically factors reflecting harshness (including lack of resources) and unpredictability (exposure to instability and stressful events) in the development of DRD. Yet, existing research uses disparate indicators of environmental risk and often draws on small samples resulting in conflicting findings, making comparisons across studies challenging. The current systematic review examined environmental factors that may place youth at greatest risk for heightened DRD and subsequent negative health outcomes. Search results identified 28 articles reflecting 20 unique samples. Additionally, meta-analyses were conducted to examine overall effects for the two most commonly examined environmental predictors (family income and family history of substance use disorder). Results suggest small-to-medium associations of environmental risk with DRD, with smaller associations observed for more distal predictors of harshness (e.g., family income) and larger associations among more proximal indicators of environmental instability (e.g., harsh parenting and parental pathology). Findings highlight the role of environmental factors on DRD development and may inform future interventions. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579425100886 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=586
in Development and Psychopathology > 38-2 (May 2026) . - p.945-960[article] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of environmental disadvantage on youth delayed reward discounting [texte imprimé] / Julia W. FELTON, Auteur ; Geoffrey KAHN, Auteur ; Jaclyn JOHNSON, Auteur ; Hira ALI, Auteur ; Souad SALEH, Auteur ; Nadya HABIB, Auteur ; Brion MAHER, Auteur ; Justin C. STRICKLAND, Auteur ; Jeewon CHEONG, Auteur ; Richard YI, Auteur ; Jill A. RABINOWITZ, Auteur . - p.945-960.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 38-2 (May 2026) . - p.945-960
Mots-clés : Adolescents adversity children delay discounting environment stress Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Delayed reward discounting (DRD), the tendency to prefer smaller rewards available immediately relative to larger rewards available after a delay, is associated with numerous health outcomes across the lifespan. Emerging literature points to the central role of early environments, specifically factors reflecting harshness (including lack of resources) and unpredictability (exposure to instability and stressful events) in the development of DRD. Yet, existing research uses disparate indicators of environmental risk and often draws on small samples resulting in conflicting findings, making comparisons across studies challenging. The current systematic review examined environmental factors that may place youth at greatest risk for heightened DRD and subsequent negative health outcomes. Search results identified 28 articles reflecting 20 unique samples. Additionally, meta-analyses were conducted to examine overall effects for the two most commonly examined environmental predictors (family income and family history of substance use disorder). Results suggest small-to-medium associations of environmental risk with DRD, with smaller associations observed for more distal predictors of harshness (e.g., family income) and larger associations among more proximal indicators of environmental instability (e.g., harsh parenting and parental pathology). Findings highlight the role of environmental factors on DRD development and may inform future interventions. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579425100886 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=586

