Brain activity during facial processing in autism spectrum disorder: an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies / Cristiano COSTA in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62-12 (December 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-12 (December 2021) . - p.1412-1424 Titre : Brain activity during facial processing in autism spectrum disorder: an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Cristiano COSTA, Auteur ; Ioana A. CRISTEA, Auteur ; Elisa DAL BÃ’, Auteur ; Caterina MELLONI, Auteur ; Claudio GENTILI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1412-1424 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnostic imaging  Brain/diagnostic imaging  Brain Mapping  Humans  Likelihood Functions  Magnetic Resonance Imaging  Neuroimaging  Functional MRI (fMRI)  autism spectrum disorders  face perception  meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Though aberrant face processing is a hallmark of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), findings on accompanying brain activity are divergent. Therefore, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of studies examining brain activity during face processing. METHODS: We searched PubMed and PsycINFO using combinations of terms as 'fMRI', 'Autism Spectrum Disorder', 'Face Perception'. Eligible studies reported on DSM-diagnosed ASD individuals, compared to controls (HC), using face stimuli presented in fMRI and reporting whole-brain analysis coordinates. We compared two approaches: 'convergence of differences' (primary analysis) using study-level coordinates from ASD vs. HC contrasts, and 'differences in convergence' (secondary) pooling coordinates within each group separately, and contrasting the resultant ALE maps. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies (655 ASD and 668 HC) were included. Primary analysis identified a cluster in amygdala/parahippocampus where HC showed greater convergence of activation. Secondary analysis yielded no significant results. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ASD dysfunction in face processing relies on structures involved in emotional processing rather than perception. We also demonstrate that the two ALE methodologies lead to divergent results. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13412 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=456 [article] Brain activity during facial processing in autism spectrum disorder: an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies [texte imprimé] / Cristiano COSTA, Auteur ; Ioana A. CRISTEA, Auteur ; Elisa DAL BÃ’, Auteur ; Caterina MELLONI, Auteur ; Claudio GENTILI, Auteur . - p.1412-1424. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-12 (December 2021) . - p.1412-1424 Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnostic imaging  Brain/diagnostic imaging  Brain Mapping  Humans  Likelihood Functions  Magnetic Resonance Imaging  Neuroimaging  Functional MRI (fMRI)  autism spectrum disorders  face perception  meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Though aberrant face processing is a hallmark of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), findings on accompanying brain activity are divergent. Therefore, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of studies examining brain activity during face processing. METHODS: We searched PubMed and PsycINFO using combinations of terms as 'fMRI', 'Autism Spectrum Disorder', 'Face Perception'. Eligible studies reported on DSM-diagnosed ASD individuals, compared to controls (HC), using face stimuli presented in fMRI and reporting whole-brain analysis coordinates. We compared two approaches: 'convergence of differences' (primary analysis) using study-level coordinates from ASD vs. HC contrasts, and 'differences in convergence' (secondary) pooling coordinates within each group separately, and contrasting the resultant ALE maps. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies (655 ASD and 668 HC) were included. Primary analysis identified a cluster in amygdala/parahippocampus where HC showed greater convergence of activation. Secondary analysis yielded no significant results. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ASD dysfunction in face processing relies on structures involved in emotional processing rather than perception. We also demonstrate that the two ALE methodologies lead to divergent results. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13412 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=456

Practitioner Review: Cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis / Ioana A. CRISTEA in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-7 (July 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-7 (July 2015) . - p.723-734 Titre : Practitioner Review: Cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Ioana A. CRISTEA, Auteur ; Cristina MOGOAȘE, Auteur ; Daniel DAVID, Auteur ; Pim CUIJPERS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.723-734 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Cognitive bias modification  meta-analysis  RCT interventions  clinical efficacy  mental health  children  adolescents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Despite accumulating research and bold claims about the efficacy of cognitive bias modification (CBM) for young populations, no meta-analysis has attempted to synthesize the research literature so far. We examined whether there was empirical evidence for the clinical efficacy of CBM interventions in youths, while also considering the methodological quality of this evidence. Methods Studies were identified through systematic searches in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library and EMBASE to June 2014). We included randomized controlled trials of CBM interventions, and considered both clinical outcomes and targeted biases. We examined the quality of the trials, as well as potential publication bias and possible moderators. Results We identified 23 trials that reported on four types of outcomes: mental health, anxiety, depression and bias. Effect sizes were small and nonsignificant for all symptom outcomes considered. We found a moderate significant effect size for bias outcomes (Hedges' g of 0.53), with significant heterogeneity. There were no differences between types of CBM interventions, or between one versus multiple-session applications. A small but significant effect size for mental health problems arose when the intervention was delivered in schools. The quality of almost all of the included studies was suboptimal and the vast majority did not include information needed for allowing quality assessment. Conclusions We conducted the first meta-analysis of CBM interventions for children and adolescents and found no effects for mental health outcomes, but we did find moderate and significant effects on the targeted biases. Our results cast serious doubts on CBM interventions having any clinical utility for nonadult populations. Demand characteristics might play an important part in CBM research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12383 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260 [article] Practitioner Review: Cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis [texte imprimé] / Ioana A. CRISTEA, Auteur ; Cristina MOGOAȘE, Auteur ; Daniel DAVID, Auteur ; Pim CUIJPERS, Auteur . - p.723-734. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-7 (July 2015) . - p.723-734 Mots-clés : Cognitive bias modification  meta-analysis  RCT interventions  clinical efficacy  mental health  children  adolescents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Despite accumulating research and bold claims about the efficacy of cognitive bias modification (CBM) for young populations, no meta-analysis has attempted to synthesize the research literature so far. We examined whether there was empirical evidence for the clinical efficacy of CBM interventions in youths, while also considering the methodological quality of this evidence. Methods Studies were identified through systematic searches in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library and EMBASE to June 2014). We included randomized controlled trials of CBM interventions, and considered both clinical outcomes and targeted biases. We examined the quality of the trials, as well as potential publication bias and possible moderators. Results We identified 23 trials that reported on four types of outcomes: mental health, anxiety, depression and bias. Effect sizes were small and nonsignificant for all symptom outcomes considered. We found a moderate significant effect size for bias outcomes (Hedges' g of 0.53), with significant heterogeneity. There were no differences between types of CBM interventions, or between one versus multiple-session applications. A small but significant effect size for mental health problems arose when the intervention was delivered in schools. The quality of almost all of the included studies was suboptimal and the vast majority did not include information needed for allowing quality assessment. Conclusions We conducted the first meta-analysis of CBM interventions for children and adolescents and found no effects for mental health outcomes, but we did find moderate and significant effects on the targeted biases. Our results cast serious doubts on CBM interventions having any clinical utility for nonadult populations. Demand characteristics might play an important part in CBM research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12383 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2) Par page : 25 50 100 200