[article]
Titre : |
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
J. B. LEBERSFELD, Auteur ; M. SWANSON, Auteur ; C. D. CLESI, Auteur ; S. E. O'KELLEY, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.4101-4114 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Adi-r Ados-2 Autism spectrum disorder Diagnosis Hsroc Meta-analysis |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from .89-.92 and .81-.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were .75 and .82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research = .85, Clinical = .72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=454 |
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-11 (November 2021) . - p.4101-4114
|