Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
12 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Sensitivity and Specificity'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people / H. PHILLIPS in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-2 (February 2022)
[article]
Titre : Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : H. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; B. WRIGHT, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; H. MCCONACHIE, Auteur ; J. SWEETMAN, Auteur ; R. HARGATE, Auteur ; R. HODKINSON, Auteur ; M. BLAND, Auteur ; H. GEORGE, Auteur ; A. HUGHES, Auteur ; E. HAYWARD, Auteur ; V. F. G. DE LAS HERAS, Auteur ; A. LE COUTEUR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.553-568 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans Sensitivity and Specificity Specialization Assessment Autism Spectrum Disorder Autism diagnostic observation schedule Deaf Delphi consensus Diagnosis Sign language research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2-18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1-3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65-89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66-89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04931-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.553-568[article] Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / H. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; B. WRIGHT, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; H. MCCONACHIE, Auteur ; J. SWEETMAN, Auteur ; R. HARGATE, Auteur ; R. HODKINSON, Auteur ; M. BLAND, Auteur ; H. GEORGE, Auteur ; A. HUGHES, Auteur ; E. HAYWARD, Auteur ; V. F. G. DE LAS HERAS, Auteur ; A. LE COUTEUR, Auteur . - p.553-568.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.553-568
Mots-clés : Adolescent Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans Sensitivity and Specificity Specialization Assessment Autism Spectrum Disorder Autism diagnostic observation schedule Deaf Delphi consensus Diagnosis Sign language research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2-18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1-3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65-89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66-89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04931-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children / J. B. LEBERSFELD in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51-11 (November 2021)
[article]
Titre : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : J. B. LEBERSFELD, Auteur ; M. SWANSON, Auteur ; C. D. CLESI, Auteur ; S. E. O'KELLEY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4101-4114 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Adi-r Ados-2 Autism spectrum disorder Diagnosis Hsroc Meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from .89-.92 and .81-.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were .75 and .82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research = .85, Clinical = .72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=454
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-11 (November 2021) . - p.4101-4114[article] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / J. B. LEBERSFELD, Auteur ; M. SWANSON, Auteur ; C. D. CLESI, Auteur ; S. E. O'KELLEY, Auteur . - p.4101-4114.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-11 (November 2021) . - p.4101-4114
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Adi-r Ados-2 Autism spectrum disorder Diagnosis Hsroc Meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from .89-.92 and .81-.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were .75 and .82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research = .85, Clinical = .72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=454 The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders: Field-testing an autism-specific screening tool for children 12 to 36 months of age / Amy M. WETHERBY in Autism, 25-7 (October 2021)
[article]
Titre : The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders: Field-testing an autism-specific screening tool for children 12 to 36 months of age Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy M. WETHERBY, Auteur ; W. GUTHRIE, Auteur ; J. L. HOOKER, Auteur ; Abigail D. DELEHANTY, Auteur ; T. N. DAY, Auteur ; J. WOODS, Auteur ; K. PIERCE, Auteur ; S. S. MANWARING, Auteur ; A. THURM, Auteur ; S. OZONOFF, Auteur ; E. PETKOVA, Auteur ; C. LORD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2112-2123 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Child, Preschool Communication Disorders/diagnosis Humans Infant Mass Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders autism spectrum disorder field-testing screening validation conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.M.W. is co-author of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and receives royalties but not from this study. Catherine Lord is author of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2). C.L. and W.G. are authors of the ADOS Toddler Module (ADOS-T). They receive royalties from use of the ADOS-2/ADOS-T, but not from this study. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is a critical need for accurate screening tools for autism spectrum disorder in very young children so families can access tailored intervention services as early as possible. However, there are few screeners designed for children 18-24?months. Developing screeners that pick up on the signs of autism spectrum disorder in very young children has proved even more challenging. In this study, we examined a new autism-specific parent-report screening tool, the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders for children between 12 and 36?months of age. Field-testing was done in five sites with 471 children screened for communication delays in primary care or referred for familial risk or concern for autism spectrum disorder. The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders was tested in three age groups: 12-17, 18-23, and 24-36?months. A best-estimate diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, or typical development was made. Analyses examined all 46 items and identified 30 items that best discriminated autism spectrum disorder from the non-spectrum groups. Cutoffs were established for each age group with good sensitivity and specificity. Results provide preliminary support for the accuracy of the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders as an autism-specific screener in children 12-36?months with elevated risk of communication delay or autism spectrum disorder. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211012526 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=451
in Autism > 25-7 (October 2021) . - p.2112-2123[article] The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders: Field-testing an autism-specific screening tool for children 12 to 36 months of age [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy M. WETHERBY, Auteur ; W. GUTHRIE, Auteur ; J. L. HOOKER, Auteur ; Abigail D. DELEHANTY, Auteur ; T. N. DAY, Auteur ; J. WOODS, Auteur ; K. PIERCE, Auteur ; S. S. MANWARING, Auteur ; A. THURM, Auteur ; S. OZONOFF, Auteur ; E. PETKOVA, Auteur ; C. LORD, Auteur . - p.2112-2123.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 25-7 (October 2021) . - p.2112-2123
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Child, Preschool Communication Disorders/diagnosis Humans Infant Mass Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders autism spectrum disorder field-testing screening validation conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.M.W. is co-author of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and receives royalties but not from this study. Catherine Lord is author of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2). C.L. and W.G. are authors of the ADOS Toddler Module (ADOS-T). They receive royalties from use of the ADOS-2/ADOS-T, but not from this study. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is a critical need for accurate screening tools for autism spectrum disorder in very young children so families can access tailored intervention services as early as possible. However, there are few screeners designed for children 18-24?months. Developing screeners that pick up on the signs of autism spectrum disorder in very young children has proved even more challenging. In this study, we examined a new autism-specific parent-report screening tool, the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders for children between 12 and 36?months of age. Field-testing was done in five sites with 471 children screened for communication delays in primary care or referred for familial risk or concern for autism spectrum disorder. The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders was tested in three age groups: 12-17, 18-23, and 24-36?months. A best-estimate diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, or typical development was made. Analyses examined all 46 items and identified 30 items that best discriminated autism spectrum disorder from the non-spectrum groups. Cutoffs were established for each age group with good sensitivity and specificity. Results provide preliminary support for the accuracy of the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders as an autism-specific screener in children 12-36?months with elevated risk of communication delay or autism spectrum disorder. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211012526 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=451 The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders: Field-testing an autism-specific screening tool for children 12 to 36 months of age / Amy M. WETHERBY in Autism, 26-7 (October 2022)
[article]
Titre : The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders: Field-testing an autism-specific screening tool for children 12 to 36 months of age Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy M. WETHERBY, Auteur ; Whitney GUTHRIE, Auteur ; Jessica L HOOKER, Auteur ; Abigail D. DELEHANTY, Auteur ; Taylor N. DAY, Auteur ; Juliann WOODS, Auteur ; Karen PIERCE, Auteur ; Stacy S. MANWARING, Auteur ; Audrey THURM, Auteur ; Sally OZONOFF, Auteur ; Eva PETKOVA, Auteur ; Catherine LORD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2112-2123 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Child, Preschool Communication Disorders/diagnosis Humans Infant Mass Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders autism spectrum disorder field-testing screening validation potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.M.W. is co-author of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and receives royalties but not from this study. Catherine Lord is author of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2). C.L. and W.G. are authors of the ADOS Toddler Module (ADOS-T). They receive royalties from use of the ADOS-2/ADOS-T, but not from this study. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is a critical need for accurate screening tools for autism spectrum disorder in very young children so families can access tailored intervention services as early as possible. However, there are few screeners designed for children 18-24months. Developing screeners that pick up on the signs of autism spectrum disorder in very young children has proved even more challenging. In this study, we examined a new autism-specific parent-report screening tool, the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders for children between 12 and 36months of age. Field-testing was done in five sites with 471 children screened for communication delays in primary care or referred for familial risk or concern for autism spectrum disorder. The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders was tested in three age groups: 12-17, 18-23, and 24-36months. A best-estimate diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, or typical development was made. Analyses examined all 46 items and identified 30 items that best discriminated autism spectrum disorder from the non-spectrum groups. Cutoffs were established for each age group with good sensitivity and specificity. Results provide preliminary support for the accuracy of the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders as an autism-specific screener in children 12-36months with elevated risk of communication delay or autism spectrum disorder. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211012526 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=484
in Autism > 26-7 (October 2022) . - p.2112-2123[article] The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders: Field-testing an autism-specific screening tool for children 12 to 36 months of age [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy M. WETHERBY, Auteur ; Whitney GUTHRIE, Auteur ; Jessica L HOOKER, Auteur ; Abigail D. DELEHANTY, Auteur ; Taylor N. DAY, Auteur ; Juliann WOODS, Auteur ; Karen PIERCE, Auteur ; Stacy S. MANWARING, Auteur ; Audrey THURM, Auteur ; Sally OZONOFF, Auteur ; Eva PETKOVA, Auteur ; Catherine LORD, Auteur . - p.2112-2123.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 26-7 (October 2022) . - p.2112-2123
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Child, Preschool Communication Disorders/diagnosis Humans Infant Mass Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders autism spectrum disorder field-testing screening validation potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.M.W. is co-author of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and receives royalties but not from this study. Catherine Lord is author of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2). C.L. and W.G. are authors of the ADOS Toddler Module (ADOS-T). They receive royalties from use of the ADOS-2/ADOS-T, but not from this study. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is a critical need for accurate screening tools for autism spectrum disorder in very young children so families can access tailored intervention services as early as possible. However, there are few screeners designed for children 18-24months. Developing screeners that pick up on the signs of autism spectrum disorder in very young children has proved even more challenging. In this study, we examined a new autism-specific parent-report screening tool, the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders for children between 12 and 36months of age. Field-testing was done in five sites with 471 children screened for communication delays in primary care or referred for familial risk or concern for autism spectrum disorder. The Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders was tested in three age groups: 12-17, 18-23, and 24-36months. A best-estimate diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, or typical development was made. Analyses examined all 46 items and identified 30 items that best discriminated autism spectrum disorder from the non-spectrum groups. Cutoffs were established for each age group with good sensitivity and specificity. Results provide preliminary support for the accuracy of the Early Screening for Autism and Communication Disorders as an autism-specific screener in children 12-36months with elevated risk of communication delay or autism spectrum disorder. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211012526 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=484 First Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Interview for Diagnostic Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Adult Males Without Intellectual Disability / Richard VUIJK in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-8 (August 2022)
[article]
Titre : First Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Interview for Diagnostic Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Adult Males Without Intellectual Disability Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Richard VUIJK, Auteur ; Mathijs DEEN, Auteur ; Arnoud ARNTZ, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3523-3535 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent Adult Aged Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis/epidemiology Ethnicity Humans Intellectual Disability/diagnosis/epidemiology Male Middle Aged Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Interrater agreement Nida Personality disorder (PD) Validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : For autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in adults there are several diagnostic instruments available with a need for consideration of the psychometric properties. This study aimed to conduct a first psychometric evaluation of a new diagnostic ASD instrument, the NIDA (Dutch Interview for Diagnostic assessment of ASD in adults) in 90 adult males without intellectual disability (age 18-65Â years) in the Netherlands: 30 with ASD, 30 with a Personality Disorder and 30 nonpatient controls. The interrater agreement ranged from 0.79 to 1.00, the convergent validity including sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.76 to 1.00, and we observed an adequate concurrent criterion-related validity. These promising findings can serve as foundation for future psychometric NIDA studies in a more diverse population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR6391. Registered 04 May 2017. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05225-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=485
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-8 (August 2022) . - p.3523-3535[article] First Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Interview for Diagnostic Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Adult Males Without Intellectual Disability [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Richard VUIJK, Auteur ; Mathijs DEEN, Auteur ; Arnoud ARNTZ, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur . - p.3523-3535.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-8 (August 2022) . - p.3523-3535
Mots-clés : Adolescent Adult Aged Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis/epidemiology Ethnicity Humans Intellectual Disability/diagnosis/epidemiology Male Middle Aged Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Interrater agreement Nida Personality disorder (PD) Validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : For autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in adults there are several diagnostic instruments available with a need for consideration of the psychometric properties. This study aimed to conduct a first psychometric evaluation of a new diagnostic ASD instrument, the NIDA (Dutch Interview for Diagnostic assessment of ASD in adults) in 90 adult males without intellectual disability (age 18-65Â years) in the Netherlands: 30 with ASD, 30 with a Personality Disorder and 30 nonpatient controls. The interrater agreement ranged from 0.79 to 1.00, the convergent validity including sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.76 to 1.00, and we observed an adequate concurrent criterion-related validity. These promising findings can serve as foundation for future psychometric NIDA studies in a more diverse population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR6391. Registered 04 May 2017. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05225-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=485 Psychometric analysis of the Systematic Observation of Red Flags for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers / Deanna DOW in Autism, 21-3 (April 2017)
PermalinkReplication study for ADOS-2 cut-offs to assist evaluation of autism spectrum disorder / Ji Su HONG in Autism Research, 15-11 (November 2022)
PermalinkThe German version of the Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 to identify children with a risk of autism spectrum disorder / Katharina LIMBERG in Autism, 21-3 (April 2017)
PermalinkUsing machine-learning methods to identify early-life predictors of 11-year language outcome / Loretta GASPARINI in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-8 (August 2023)
PermalinkScreening in toddlers and preschoolers at risk for autism spectrum disorder: Evaluating a novel mobile-health screening tool / Stephen M. KANNE in Autism Research, 11-7 (July 2018)
Permalink