Criterion validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales 2-5 parent report / Amy CAMODECA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 86 (August 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 86 (August 2021) . - 101820 Titre : Criterion validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales 2-5 parent report Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy CAMODECA, Auteur ; Katy WALCOTT, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101820 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder  Parent report  Questionnaires  Criterion validity  Diagnostic utility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Questionnaires are frequently utilized in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) assessment and research, but there is limited evidence regarding their psychometric properties. Only two studies have investigated the diagnostic utility of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale-2-5 parent report (ASRSp 2-5), and in both of these studies, the use of a gold-standard ASD measure in the diagnostic process is unclear. Method The current study investigated the criterion validity of the ASRSp-2-5 in a clinical sample of 238 children (X¯ age = 3.66; autism[AUT] n = 84; non-autism[NOT] n = 154). Children were diagnosed via a comprehensive assessment that included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. Results Analyses included t-tests/ANCOVAs, Logistic Regression (with and without covariates), and ROC analyses (with t-scores and predicted probabilities to account for covariates). The ASRSp 2-5 scores intended to be used for diagnosis (Total and DSM-5) were non-significant in all analyses. Higher scores in the NOT group were found for Unusual Behavior and Behavioral Rigidity. However, mean differences were non-significant with inclusion of control variables (IQ and age). Social, Peer Interaction, and Social-Emotional Reciprocity demonstrated the strongest findings. The ASD group had significantly higher scores on these scales, and findings held with covariates included (IQ for Social; age for Peer Interaction). However, odds ratios were small whether or not covariates were included, and AUCs were poor-fair (.69–.70). Sensitivity and specificity could not both be optimized at any cutpoint. Conclusions The findings were not as strong or as consistent as expected. Results suggest the ASRSp 2-5 is most useful in ruling out ASD in cases of low scores (<60). When the ASRSp 2-5 is utilized, behavioral, social, and emotional problems associated with other disorders must be considered in interpreting scores. Additional research on this measure is necessary. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101820 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=458 [article] Criterion validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales 2-5 parent report [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur ; Katy WALCOTT, Auteur . - 101820. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 86 (August 2021) . - 101820 Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder  Parent report  Questionnaires  Criterion validity  Diagnostic utility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Questionnaires are frequently utilized in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) assessment and research, but there is limited evidence regarding their psychometric properties. Only two studies have investigated the diagnostic utility of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale-2-5 parent report (ASRSp 2-5), and in both of these studies, the use of a gold-standard ASD measure in the diagnostic process is unclear. Method The current study investigated the criterion validity of the ASRSp-2-5 in a clinical sample of 238 children (X¯ age = 3.66; autism[AUT] n = 84; non-autism[NOT] n = 154). Children were diagnosed via a comprehensive assessment that included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. Results Analyses included t-tests/ANCOVAs, Logistic Regression (with and without covariates), and ROC analyses (with t-scores and predicted probabilities to account for covariates). The ASRSp 2-5 scores intended to be used for diagnosis (Total and DSM-5) were non-significant in all analyses. Higher scores in the NOT group were found for Unusual Behavior and Behavioral Rigidity. However, mean differences were non-significant with inclusion of control variables (IQ and age). Social, Peer Interaction, and Social-Emotional Reciprocity demonstrated the strongest findings. The ASD group had significantly higher scores on these scales, and findings held with covariates included (IQ for Social; age for Peer Interaction). However, odds ratios were small whether or not covariates were included, and AUCs were poor-fair (.69–.70). Sensitivity and specificity could not both be optimized at any cutpoint. Conclusions The findings were not as strong or as consistent as expected. Results suggest the ASRSp 2-5 is most useful in ruling out ASD in cases of low scores (<60). When the ASRSp 2-5 is utilized, behavioral, social, and emotional problems associated with other disorders must be considered in interpreting scores. Additional research on this measure is necessary. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101820 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=458

Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children / Amy CAMODECA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53-5 (May 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-5 (May 2023) . - p.2112-2126 Titre : Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy CAMODECA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2112-2126 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is limited research regarding the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition (GARS-3) despite its extensive use. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd Edition (ADOS-2) was provided to 186 clinically referred children suspected of autism ($$\overline{X }$$age=8.98; Autism [AUT] n=87; Not Autism [NOT] n=99). Mean difference analyses, Logistic Regressions, and ROC analyses were non-significant for both Autism Index scores. The author-suggested cutoff score of 70 correctly classified approximately 47% of participants, with false positive rates=82.83-87.88%. ADOS-2 correlations were significantly lower vis-à-vis the standardization sample. The Social Interaction subscale demonstrated weak, marginal results, and sensitivity/specificity could not be optimized. In its current form, the GARS-3 does not demonstrate adequate criterion validity for use in assessment of complex community samples. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05483-5 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=501 [article] Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur . - p.2112-2126. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-5 (May 2023) . - p.2112-2126 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is limited research regarding the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition (GARS-3) despite its extensive use. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd Edition (ADOS-2) was provided to 186 clinically referred children suspected of autism ($$\overline{X }$$age=8.98; Autism [AUT] n=87; Not Autism [NOT] n=99). Mean difference analyses, Logistic Regressions, and ROC analyses were non-significant for both Autism Index scores. The author-suggested cutoff score of 70 correctly classified approximately 47% of participants, with false positive rates=82.83-87.88%. ADOS-2 correlations were significantly lower vis-à-vis the standardization sample. The Social Interaction subscale demonstrated weak, marginal results, and sensitivity/specificity could not be optimized. In its current form, the GARS-3 does not demonstrate adequate criterion validity for use in assessment of complex community samples. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05483-5 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=501

Theory of Mind Performance in Broad Autism Phenotype Groups: Between-Group Differences and Predictor Variables / Amy CAMODECA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-10 (October 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-10 (October 2019) . - p.4079-4096 Titre : Theory of Mind Performance in Broad Autism Phenotype Groups: Between-Group Differences and Predictor Variables Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy CAMODECA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4079-4096 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism traits  Broad autism phenotype  Reading the mind in the eyes  Theory of mind  Unexpected outcomes Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Investigated between-group differences in cognitive/affective theory of mind (ToM) and predictors of cognitive ToM both within broad autism phenotype/non (BAP/Non-BAP) groups as well as across the sample. The BAP group (n = 45) performed worse than the Non-BAP group (n = 102) on the unexpected outcomes test (UOT), but groups were similar regarding reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET). Stepwise regression indicated RMET best predicted UOT for the BAP group; block design best predicted UOT in the Non-BAP group. BAP traits did not mediate the relation of RMET to UOT performance. While RMET and UOT appear similarly related in BAP/Non-BAP samples, use of emotion recognition abilities in a cognitive ToM task may reflect over-reliance on this skill in the BAP. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04126-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=407 [article] Theory of Mind Performance in Broad Autism Phenotype Groups: Between-Group Differences and Predictor Variables [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur . - p.4079-4096. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-10 (October 2019) . - p.4079-4096 Mots-clés : Autism traits  Broad autism phenotype  Reading the mind in the eyes  Theory of mind  Unexpected outcomes Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Investigated between-group differences in cognitive/affective theory of mind (ToM) and predictors of cognitive ToM both within broad autism phenotype/non (BAP/Non-BAP) groups as well as across the sample. The BAP group (n = 45) performed worse than the Non-BAP group (n = 102) on the unexpected outcomes test (UOT), but groups were similar regarding reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET). Stepwise regression indicated RMET best predicted UOT for the BAP group; block design best predicted UOT in the Non-BAP group. BAP traits did not mediate the relation of RMET to UOT performance. While RMET and UOT appear similarly related in BAP/Non-BAP samples, use of emotion recognition abilities in a cognitive ToM task may reflect over-reliance on this skill in the BAP. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04126-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=407

Utility of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale in the Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorders / Amy CAMODECA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50-2 (February 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-2 (February 2020) . - p.513-523 Titre : Utility of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale in the Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy CAMODECA, Auteur ; Kylie Q. TODD, Auteur ; Jennifer CROYLE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.513-523 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Auc  Autism  Criterion validity  Questionnaires  Roc  Reliability Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Investigated internal consistency reliability and criterion validity of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (ASDS) in a well-characterized sample of 120 children ([Formula: see text] = 9.91; autism [AUT] n = 54; non-autism [NOT] n = 66) who completed comprehensive outpatient evaluations with a gold-standard measure, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. With the exception of a low Cognitive alpha in the AUT group, internal consistency reliabilities ranged from moderate to high. Significant between-group mean differences were observed for all scores. Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated Area Under the Curve in the fair range (.71). Cutoff points and interpretation are discussed. The ASDS appears most useful in cases of either low or high scores or as an adjuvant to gold-standard measures. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04272-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=416 [article] Utility of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale in the Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur ; Kylie Q. TODD, Auteur ; Jennifer CROYLE, Auteur . - p.513-523. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-2 (February 2020) . - p.513-523 Mots-clés : Auc  Autism  Criterion validity  Questionnaires  Roc  Reliability Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Investigated internal consistency reliability and criterion validity of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (ASDS) in a well-characterized sample of 120 children ([Formula: see text] = 9.91; autism [AUT] n = 54; non-autism [NOT] n = 66) who completed comprehensive outpatient evaluations with a gold-standard measure, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. With the exception of a low Cognitive alpha in the AUT group, internal consistency reliabilities ranged from moderate to high. Significant between-group mean differences were observed for all scores. Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated Area Under the Curve in the fair range (.71). Cutoff points and interpretation are discussed. The ASDS appears most useful in cases of either low or high scores or as an adjuvant to gold-standard measures. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04272-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=416

Utility of three N-Item scales of the child behavior checklist 6–18 in autism diagnosis / Amy CAMODECA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 51 (July 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 51 (July 2018) . - p.75-85 Titre : Utility of three N-Item scales of the child behavior checklist 6–18 in autism diagnosis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy CAMODECA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.75-85 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Child behavior checklist  ASD  ADOS  Diagnosis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background There is a need for well-validated questionnaire measures as an adjuvant to autism diagnosis. Three past research studies have each delineated a subsample of questions (5-, 9-, and 10-items) from the Child Behavior Checklist 6–18 (CBCL-6-18) that differentiate children with autism from those without (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001; Duarte, Bordin, Oliveira, & Bird, 2003; Ooi, Rescorla, Ang, Woo, & Fung, 2011; So et al., 2012). Despite the potential of these subscales, no research aside from the initial investigations has been published, and the initial studies had methodological limitations. Method This study investigated the criterion validity of the 5-, 9-, and 10-item autism subscales in a well-characterized sample of 483 community-referred children (X?age?=?10.11, SDage?=?2.99, Autism n?=?127; Not-Autism n?=?356). Autism diagnosis was made using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 and children were diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria. Results Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses indicated Area Under the Curve in the poor range (0.633–.684 [95%CIs?=?0.578–.734], ps? En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.004 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=362 [article] Utility of three N-Item scales of the child behavior checklist 6–18 in autism diagnosis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur . - p.75-85. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 51 (July 2018) . - p.75-85 Mots-clés : Child behavior checklist  ASD  ADOS  Diagnosis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background There is a need for well-validated questionnaire measures as an adjuvant to autism diagnosis. Three past research studies have each delineated a subsample of questions (5-, 9-, and 10-items) from the Child Behavior Checklist 6–18 (CBCL-6-18) that differentiate children with autism from those without (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001; Duarte, Bordin, Oliveira, & Bird, 2003; Ooi, Rescorla, Ang, Woo, & Fung, 2011; So et al., 2012). Despite the potential of these subscales, no research aside from the initial investigations has been published, and the initial studies had methodological limitations. Method This study investigated the criterion validity of the 5-, 9-, and 10-item autism subscales in a well-characterized sample of 483 community-referred children (X?age?=?10.11, SDage?=?2.99, Autism n?=?127; Not-Autism n?=?356). Autism diagnosis was made using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 and children were diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria. Results Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses indicated Area Under the Curve in the poor range (0.633–.684 [95%CIs?=?0.578–.734], ps? En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.004 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=362

---

1 (1 - 5 / 5)