Empirically-identified subgroups of children with autism spectrum disorder and their response to two types of cognitive behavioral therapy / Anchuen CHO in Development and Psychopathology, 35-3 (August 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 35-3 (August 2023) . - p.1188-1202 Titre : Empirically-identified subgroups of children with autism spectrum disorder and their response to two types of cognitive behavioral therapy Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Anchuen CHO, Auteur ; Jeffrey J. WOOD, Auteur ; Emilio FERRER, Auteur ; Kashia ROSENAU, Auteur ; Eric A. STORCH, Auteur ; Philip C. KENDALL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1188-1202 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder  cognitive behavioral therapy  five-factor model of personality  latent profile analysis  treatment response Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is heterogeneous and likely entails distinct phenotypes with varying etiologies. Identifying these subgroups may contribute to hypotheses about differential treatment responses. The present study aimed to discern subgroups among children with ASD and anxiety in context of the five-factor model of personality (FFM) and evaluate treatment response differences to two cognitive-behavioral therapy treatments. The present study is a secondary data analysis of children with ASD and anxiety (N=202; ages 7-13; 20.8% female) in a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) randomized controlled trial (Wood et al., 2020). Subgroups were identified via latent profile analysis of parent-reported FFM data. Treatment groups included standard-of-practice CBT (CC), designed for children with anxiety, and adapted CBT (BIACA), designed for children with ASD and comorbid anxiety. Five subgroups with distinct profiles were extracted. Analysis of covariance revealed CBT response was contingent on subgroup membership. Two subgroups responded better to BIACA on the primary outcome measure and a third responded better to BIACA on a peer-social adaptation measure, while a fourth subgroup responded better to CC on a school-related adaptation measure. These findings suggest that the FFM may be useful in empirically identifying subgroups of children with ASD, which could inform intervention selection decisions for children with ASD and anxiety. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421001115 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=510 [article] Empirically-identified subgroups of children with autism spectrum disorder and their response to two types of cognitive behavioral therapy [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Anchuen CHO, Auteur ; Jeffrey J. WOOD, Auteur ; Emilio FERRER, Auteur ; Kashia ROSENAU, Auteur ; Eric A. STORCH, Auteur ; Philip C. KENDALL, Auteur . - p.1188-1202. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 35-3 (August 2023) . - p.1188-1202 Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder  cognitive behavioral therapy  five-factor model of personality  latent profile analysis  treatment response Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is heterogeneous and likely entails distinct phenotypes with varying etiologies. Identifying these subgroups may contribute to hypotheses about differential treatment responses. The present study aimed to discern subgroups among children with ASD and anxiety in context of the five-factor model of personality (FFM) and evaluate treatment response differences to two cognitive-behavioral therapy treatments. The present study is a secondary data analysis of children with ASD and anxiety (N=202; ages 7-13; 20.8% female) in a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) randomized controlled trial (Wood et al., 2020). Subgroups were identified via latent profile analysis of parent-reported FFM data. Treatment groups included standard-of-practice CBT (CC), designed for children with anxiety, and adapted CBT (BIACA), designed for children with ASD and comorbid anxiety. Five subgroups with distinct profiles were extracted. Analysis of covariance revealed CBT response was contingent on subgroup membership. Two subgroups responded better to BIACA on the primary outcome measure and a third responded better to BIACA on a peer-social adaptation measure, while a fourth subgroup responded better to CC on a school-related adaptation measure. These findings suggest that the FFM may be useful in empirically identifying subgroups of children with ASD, which could inform intervention selection decisions for children with ASD and anxiety. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421001115 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=510

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)