
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Austin J. BLAKE
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheParent-child separation and intergenerational transmission of substance use and disorder: Testing across three generations / Austin J. BLAKE in Development and Psychopathology, 36-1 (February 2024)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Parent-child separation and intergenerational transmission of substance use and disorder: Testing across three generations Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Austin J. BLAKE, Auteur ; David P. MACKINNON, Auteur ; Jack WADDELL, Auteur ; Laurie A. CHASSIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.28-39 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : disorder parent-child separation substance use Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is evidence for intergenerational transmission of substance use and disorder. However, it is unclear whether separation from a parent with substance use disorder (SUD) moderates intergenerational transmission, and no studies have tested this question across three generations. In a three-generation study of families oversampled for familial SUD, we tested whether separation between father (G1; first generation) and child (G2; second generation) moderated the effect of G1 father SUDs on G2 child SUDs. We also tested whether separation between father (G2) and child (G3; third generation) moderated the effect of G2 SUDs on G3 drinking. Finally, we tested whether G1-G2 or G2-G3 separation moderated the mediated effect of G1 SUDs on G3 drinking through G2 SUDs. G1 father-G2 child separation moderated intergenerational transmission. In families with G1-G2 separation, there were no significant effects of father SUD on G2 SUD or G3 drinking. However, in nonseparated families, greater G1 father SUDs predicted heightened G2 SUDs and G3 grandchild drinking. In nonseparated families, G1 father SUDs significantly predicted G2 SUDs, which predicted G3 drinking. However, G2-G3 separation predicted heightened G3 drinking regardless of G2 and G1 SUDs. Parental separation may introduce risk for SUDs and drinking among youth with lower familial risk. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000876 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=523
in Development and Psychopathology > 36-1 (February 2024) . - p.28-39[article] Parent-child separation and intergenerational transmission of substance use and disorder: Testing across three generations [texte imprimé] / Austin J. BLAKE, Auteur ; David P. MACKINNON, Auteur ; Jack WADDELL, Auteur ; Laurie A. CHASSIN, Auteur . - p.28-39.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 36-1 (February 2024) . - p.28-39
Mots-clés : disorder parent-child separation substance use Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is evidence for intergenerational transmission of substance use and disorder. However, it is unclear whether separation from a parent with substance use disorder (SUD) moderates intergenerational transmission, and no studies have tested this question across three generations. In a three-generation study of families oversampled for familial SUD, we tested whether separation between father (G1; first generation) and child (G2; second generation) moderated the effect of G1 father SUDs on G2 child SUDs. We also tested whether separation between father (G2) and child (G3; third generation) moderated the effect of G2 SUDs on G3 drinking. Finally, we tested whether G1-G2 or G2-G3 separation moderated the mediated effect of G1 SUDs on G3 drinking through G2 SUDs. G1 father-G2 child separation moderated intergenerational transmission. In families with G1-G2 separation, there were no significant effects of father SUD on G2 SUD or G3 drinking. However, in nonseparated families, greater G1 father SUDs predicted heightened G2 SUDs and G3 grandchild drinking. In nonseparated families, G1 father SUDs significantly predicted G2 SUDs, which predicted G3 drinking. However, G2-G3 separation predicted heightened G3 drinking regardless of G2 and G1 SUDs. Parental separation may introduce risk for SUDs and drinking among youth with lower familial risk. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000876 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=523 The intergenerational sequelae of dysfunctional conflict in the family of origin: Evidence from two samples / Natasha A. BAILEY in Development and Psychopathology, 38-4 (October 2026)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The intergenerational sequelae of dysfunctional conflict in the family of origin: Evidence from two samples Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Natasha A. BAILEY, Auteur ; Austin J. BLAKE, Auteur ; Alexander K. JOHANSSON, Auteur ; Jessica A. STERN, Auteur ; Meghan A. COSTELLO, Auteur ; Laurie CHASSIN, Auteur ; Joseph P. ALLEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1906-1923 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescent substance use family conflict heterotypic continuity inconsistent parental discipline intergenerational parental psychological control punitive parental responses Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This investigation examined pathways connecting dysfunctional conflict (parent and family aggression, parental psychological control) in adolescents’ families of origin to parenting of the next generation across two studies. Study 1 included 184 Generation 2 (G2) adolescents (58% White, 29% Black, 13% other identities; 99 females, 85 males) who provided data on their Generation 1 (G1) parents. A subset of 72 G2s later became parents and reported on their parenting of Generation 3 (G3) children. Study 2 included three generations: mothers and fathers (G1; N = 193), adolescents who later became parents (G2; N = 266; 63.5% White, 29.7% Latinx, 6.8% other identities; 96 males, 170 females), and their offspring (G3; N = 385). In both studies, participants reported on either their parental aggression or family aggression, parents’ psychological control, and substance use problems. In adulthood, G2s reported on their punitive responses to G3 children’s distress (Study 1); G3s reported on G2s’ inconsistent parental discipline (Study 2). Across both studies, results revealed heterotypic continuity from G1 dysfunctional family conflict to G2 dysfunctional parenting responses (βs = 0.23–0.33), as well as paths from dysfunctional family conflict to adolescent substance use problems (βs = 0.14–0.25), which subsequently predicted greater next-generation dysfunctional parenting responses (βs = 0.24–0.33). En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579426101710 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=594
in Development and Psychopathology > 38-4 (October 2026) . - p.1906-1923[article] The intergenerational sequelae of dysfunctional conflict in the family of origin: Evidence from two samples [texte imprimé] / Natasha A. BAILEY, Auteur ; Austin J. BLAKE, Auteur ; Alexander K. JOHANSSON, Auteur ; Jessica A. STERN, Auteur ; Meghan A. COSTELLO, Auteur ; Laurie CHASSIN, Auteur ; Joseph P. ALLEN, Auteur . - p.1906-1923.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 38-4 (October 2026) . - p.1906-1923
Mots-clés : adolescent substance use family conflict heterotypic continuity inconsistent parental discipline intergenerational parental psychological control punitive parental responses Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This investigation examined pathways connecting dysfunctional conflict (parent and family aggression, parental psychological control) in adolescents’ families of origin to parenting of the next generation across two studies. Study 1 included 184 Generation 2 (G2) adolescents (58% White, 29% Black, 13% other identities; 99 females, 85 males) who provided data on their Generation 1 (G1) parents. A subset of 72 G2s later became parents and reported on their parenting of Generation 3 (G3) children. Study 2 included three generations: mothers and fathers (G1; N = 193), adolescents who later became parents (G2; N = 266; 63.5% White, 29.7% Latinx, 6.8% other identities; 96 males, 170 females), and their offspring (G3; N = 385). In both studies, participants reported on either their parental aggression or family aggression, parents’ psychological control, and substance use problems. In adulthood, G2s reported on their punitive responses to G3 children’s distress (Study 1); G3s reported on G2s’ inconsistent parental discipline (Study 2). Across both studies, results revealed heterotypic continuity from G1 dysfunctional family conflict to G2 dysfunctional parenting responses (βs = 0.23–0.33), as well as paths from dysfunctional family conflict to adolescent substance use problems (βs = 0.14–0.25), which subsequently predicted greater next-generation dysfunctional parenting responses (βs = 0.24–0.33). En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579426101710 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=594

