Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Zachary M. MEEHAN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Susceptibility to peer influence in adolescents: Associations between psychophysiology and behavior / Zachary M. MEEHAN in Development and Psychopathology, 36-1 (February 2024)
[article]
Titre : Susceptibility to peer influence in adolescents: Associations between psychophysiology and behavior Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Zachary M. MEEHAN, Auteur ; Julie A. HUBBARD, Auteur ; Christina C. MOORE, Auteur ; Fanny MLAWER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.69-81 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : antisocial peer influence prosocial psychophysiology susceptibility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current study investigated in-the-moment links between adolescents' autonomic nervous system activity and susceptibility to three types of peer influence (indirect, direct, continuing) on two types of behavior (antisocial, prosocial). The sample included 144 racially ethnically diverse adolescents (46% male, 53% female, 1% other; Mage = 16.02 years). We assessed susceptibility to peer influence behaviorally using the Public Goods Game (PGG) while measuring adolescents' mean heart rate (MHR) and pre-ejection period (PEP). Three key findings emerged from bivariate dual latent change score modeling: (1) adolescents whose MHR increased more as they transitioned from playing the PGG alone (pre-influence) to playing while simply observed by peers (indirect influence) displayed more prosocial behavior; (2) adolescents whose PEP activity increased more (greater PEP activity = shorter PEP latency) as they transitioned from indirect influence to being encouraged by peers to engage in antisocial behavior (direct influence) engaged in more antisocial behavior; and (3) adolescents whose PEP activity decreased less as they transitioned from direct influence on prosocial behavior to playing the PGG alone again (continuing influence) displayed more continuing prosocial behavior (marginal effect). The discussion focuses on the role of psychophysiology in understanding adolescents' susceptibility to peer influence. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000967 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=523
in Development and Psychopathology > 36-1 (February 2024) . - p.69-81[article] Susceptibility to peer influence in adolescents: Associations between psychophysiology and behavior [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Zachary M. MEEHAN, Auteur ; Julie A. HUBBARD, Auteur ; Christina C. MOORE, Auteur ; Fanny MLAWER, Auteur . - p.69-81.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 36-1 (February 2024) . - p.69-81
Mots-clés : antisocial peer influence prosocial psychophysiology susceptibility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current study investigated in-the-moment links between adolescents' autonomic nervous system activity and susceptibility to three types of peer influence (indirect, direct, continuing) on two types of behavior (antisocial, prosocial). The sample included 144 racially ethnically diverse adolescents (46% male, 53% female, 1% other; Mage = 16.02 years). We assessed susceptibility to peer influence behaviorally using the Public Goods Game (PGG) while measuring adolescents' mean heart rate (MHR) and pre-ejection period (PEP). Three key findings emerged from bivariate dual latent change score modeling: (1) adolescents whose MHR increased more as they transitioned from playing the PGG alone (pre-influence) to playing while simply observed by peers (indirect influence) displayed more prosocial behavior; (2) adolescents whose PEP activity increased more (greater PEP activity = shorter PEP latency) as they transitioned from indirect influence to being encouraged by peers to engage in antisocial behavior (direct influence) engaged in more antisocial behavior; and (3) adolescents whose PEP activity decreased less as they transitioned from direct influence on prosocial behavior to playing the PGG alone again (continuing influence) displayed more continuing prosocial behavior (marginal effect). The discussion focuses on the role of psychophysiology in understanding adolescents' susceptibility to peer influence. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000967 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=523