Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Noah S. TRIPLETT |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Identifying intervention strategies for preventing the mental health consequences of childhood adversity: A modified Delphi study / Leslie R. RITH-NAJARIAN in Development and Psychopathology, 33-2 (May 2021)
[article]
Titre : Identifying intervention strategies for preventing the mental health consequences of childhood adversity: A modified Delphi study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Leslie R. RITH-NAJARIAN, Auteur ; Noah S. TRIPLETT, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur ; Katie A. MCLAUGHLIN, Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p.748-765 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Delphi study childhood adversity intervention development prevention psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Exposure to childhood adversity is a powerful risk factor for psychopathology. Despite extensive efforts, we have not yet identified effective or scalable interventions that prevent the emergence of mental health problems in children who have experienced adversity. In this modified Delphi study, we identified intervention strategies for effectively targeting both the neurodevelopmental mechanisms linking childhood adversity and psychopathology - including heightened emotional reactivity, difficulties with emotion regulation, blunted reward processing, and social information processing biases, as well as a range of psychopathology symptoms. We iteratively synthesized information from experts in the field and relevant meta-analyses through three surveys, first with experts in intervention development, prevention, and childhood adversity (n = 32), and then within our study team (n = 8). The results produced increasing stability and good consensus on intervention strategy recommendations for specific neurodevelopmental mechanisms and symptom presentations and on strength of evidence ratings of intervention strategies targeting youth and parents. More broadly, our findings highlight how intervention decision making can be informed by meta-analyses, enhanced by aggregate group feedback, saturated before consensus, and persistently subjective or even contradictory. Ultimately, the results converged on several promising intervention strategies for prevention programming with adversity-exposed youth, which will be tested in an upcoming clinical trial. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420002059 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=444
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-2 (May 2021) . - p.748-765[article] Identifying intervention strategies for preventing the mental health consequences of childhood adversity: A modified Delphi study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Leslie R. RITH-NAJARIAN, Auteur ; Noah S. TRIPLETT, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur ; Katie A. MCLAUGHLIN, Auteur . - 2021 . - p.748-765.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 33-2 (May 2021) . - p.748-765
Mots-clés : Delphi study childhood adversity intervention development prevention psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Exposure to childhood adversity is a powerful risk factor for psychopathology. Despite extensive efforts, we have not yet identified effective or scalable interventions that prevent the emergence of mental health problems in children who have experienced adversity. In this modified Delphi study, we identified intervention strategies for effectively targeting both the neurodevelopmental mechanisms linking childhood adversity and psychopathology - including heightened emotional reactivity, difficulties with emotion regulation, blunted reward processing, and social information processing biases, as well as a range of psychopathology symptoms. We iteratively synthesized information from experts in the field and relevant meta-analyses through three surveys, first with experts in intervention development, prevention, and childhood adversity (n = 32), and then within our study team (n = 8). The results produced increasing stability and good consensus on intervention strategy recommendations for specific neurodevelopmental mechanisms and symptom presentations and on strength of evidence ratings of intervention strategies targeting youth and parents. More broadly, our findings highlight how intervention decision making can be informed by meta-analyses, enhanced by aggregate group feedback, saturated before consensus, and persistently subjective or even contradictory. Ultimately, the results converged on several promising intervention strategies for prevention programming with adversity-exposed youth, which will be tested in an upcoming clinical trial. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420002059 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=444