Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Sam PARSONS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Cognitive mechanisms predicting resilient functioning in adolescence: Evidence from the CogBIAS longitudinal study / Charlotte BOOTH in Development and Psychopathology, 34-1 (February 2022)
[article]
Titre : Cognitive mechanisms predicting resilient functioning in adolescence: Evidence from the CogBIAS longitudinal study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Charlotte BOOTH, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Sam PARSONS, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.345-353 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescence cognitive bias longitudinal resilient functioning Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Resilience is a dynamic process depicted by better than expected levels of functioning in response to significant adversity. This can be assessed statistically, by taking the residuals from a model of psychological functioning regressed onto negative life events. We report the first study to investigate multiple cognitive factors in relation to this depiction of resilient functioning. Life events, internalizing symptoms, and a range of cognitive risk and protective factors were assessed in a large sample of adolescents (N = 504) across three waves spaced 12?18 months apart. Adolescents who displayed fewer symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered more resilient. Adolescents who displayed more symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered less resilient. All cognitive factors were associated with resilient functioning to differing degrees. These included memory bias, interpretation bias, worry, rumination, self-esteem, and self-reported trait resilience. Regression models showed that memory bias was a key factor explaining unique variance in prospective resilient functioning. In a subsequent cross-lagged panel model, memory bias and resilient functioning were reinforcing mechanisms across time points, supporting cognitive models of emotional resilience. This study adds to the literature, by highlighting key cognitive mechanisms as potential intervention targets En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420000668 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-1 (February 2022) . - p.345-353[article] Cognitive mechanisms predicting resilient functioning in adolescence: Evidence from the CogBIAS longitudinal study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Charlotte BOOTH, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Sam PARSONS, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur . - p.345-353.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-1 (February 2022) . - p.345-353
Mots-clés : adolescence cognitive bias longitudinal resilient functioning Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Resilience is a dynamic process depicted by better than expected levels of functioning in response to significant adversity. This can be assessed statistically, by taking the residuals from a model of psychological functioning regressed onto negative life events. We report the first study to investigate multiple cognitive factors in relation to this depiction of resilient functioning. Life events, internalizing symptoms, and a range of cognitive risk and protective factors were assessed in a large sample of adolescents (N = 504) across three waves spaced 12?18 months apart. Adolescents who displayed fewer symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered more resilient. Adolescents who displayed more symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered less resilient. All cognitive factors were associated with resilient functioning to differing degrees. These included memory bias, interpretation bias, worry, rumination, self-esteem, and self-reported trait resilience. Regression models showed that memory bias was a key factor explaining unique variance in prospective resilient functioning. In a subsequent cross-lagged panel model, memory bias and resilient functioning were reinforcing mechanisms across time points, supporting cognitive models of emotional resilience. This study adds to the literature, by highlighting key cognitive mechanisms as potential intervention targets En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420000668 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474