Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Group-based social skills interventions'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Systematic review of data analyses and reporting in group-based social skills intervention RCTs for youth with ASD / Christopher LOPATA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 59 (March 2019)
[article]
Titre : Systematic review of data analyses and reporting in group-based social skills intervention RCTs for youth with ASD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Christopher LOPATA, Auteur ; James P. DONNELLY, Auteur ; Jonathan D. RODGERS, Auteur ; Marcus L. THOMEER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.10-21 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Group-based social skills interventions Youth with ASD Systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Group-based social skills interventions (GSSIs) are commonly used to address the social impairments of youth with ASD. However, the administration of treatments in group formats (i.e., clusters) poses several methodological challenges including accounting for cluster effects. The most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs of GSSIs for youth with ASD yielded an overall medium effect (g = 0.51; Gates et al., 2017). This suggested a positive effect; however, little is known about the extent to which the studies adhered to standards for conducting and reporting RCTs including standards related to group-based interventions. Method The current review assessed the extent to which the study planning, data assessment, and data analytic procedures used in the RCTs (N =18) included in the meta-analysis adhered to established standards for RCTs. Results Results were consistent across the three areas assessed and suggested an overall adherence rate of 42% (range 41%–43%). Significant variability was found within each of the three areas and suggested that few facets of the standards were met by a majority of studies. The statistically-oriented aspects were most neglected. None of the studies accounted for the group-based (clustered) design and delivery of the intervention which can negatively impact power, effect size, and precision estimates and overestimate intervention effects. Year of article publication and journal impact factor were predominantly unrelated to adherence rates. Conclusions Increased familiarization with standards for RCTs appears necessary to improve the practices of researchers, along with increased requirements for adherence by journal editors and reviewers. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.008 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=379
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 59 (March 2019) . - p.10-21[article] Systematic review of data analyses and reporting in group-based social skills intervention RCTs for youth with ASD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Christopher LOPATA, Auteur ; James P. DONNELLY, Auteur ; Jonathan D. RODGERS, Auteur ; Marcus L. THOMEER, Auteur . - p.10-21.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 59 (March 2019) . - p.10-21
Mots-clés : Group-based social skills interventions Youth with ASD Systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Group-based social skills interventions (GSSIs) are commonly used to address the social impairments of youth with ASD. However, the administration of treatments in group formats (i.e., clusters) poses several methodological challenges including accounting for cluster effects. The most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs of GSSIs for youth with ASD yielded an overall medium effect (g = 0.51; Gates et al., 2017). This suggested a positive effect; however, little is known about the extent to which the studies adhered to standards for conducting and reporting RCTs including standards related to group-based interventions. Method The current review assessed the extent to which the study planning, data assessment, and data analytic procedures used in the RCTs (N =18) included in the meta-analysis adhered to established standards for RCTs. Results Results were consistent across the three areas assessed and suggested an overall adherence rate of 42% (range 41%–43%). Significant variability was found within each of the three areas and suggested that few facets of the standards were met by a majority of studies. The statistically-oriented aspects were most neglected. None of the studies accounted for the group-based (clustered) design and delivery of the intervention which can negatively impact power, effect size, and precision estimates and overestimate intervention effects. Year of article publication and journal impact factor were predominantly unrelated to adherence rates. Conclusions Increased familiarization with standards for RCTs appears necessary to improve the practices of researchers, along with increased requirements for adherence by journal editors and reviewers. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.008 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=379