Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Manual signing'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders / Larah VAN DER MEER in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6-4 (October-December 2012)
[article]
Titre : A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Larah VAN DER MEER, Auteur ; Dean SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; Mark O'REILLY, Auteur ; Giulio E. LANCIONI, Auteur ; Jeff SIGAFOOS, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1247-1257 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Augmentative and alternative communication Autism spectrum disorders Manual signing Picture exchange communication Preference assessment Specific requesting Speech-generating devices Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We compared acquisition of, and preference for, manual signing (MS), picture exchange (PE), and speech-generating devices (SGDs) in four children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Intervention was introduced across participants in a non-concurrent multiple-baseline design and acquisition of the three communication modes was compared in an alternating treatments design. Children's preference for using MS, PE or the SGD was also assessed. With intervention, all four participants learned to make specific requests using at least one of the three communication modes. The children also showed a preference for one mode. These results extend previous studies by demonstrating (in four new children with ASD) differential acquisition of, and idiosyncratic preferences for, three commonly used alternative communication modes. The present results further suggest faster acquisition and better maintenance with the preferred mode. We conclude that children's preferences for MS, PE, and SGDs should be considered when designing and implementing augmentative and alternative communication interventions. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.005 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=165
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-4 (October-December 2012) . - p.1247-1257[article] A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Larah VAN DER MEER, Auteur ; Dean SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; Mark O'REILLY, Auteur ; Giulio E. LANCIONI, Auteur ; Jeff SIGAFOOS, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1247-1257.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-4 (October-December 2012) . - p.1247-1257
Mots-clés : Augmentative and alternative communication Autism spectrum disorders Manual signing Picture exchange communication Preference assessment Specific requesting Speech-generating devices Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We compared acquisition of, and preference for, manual signing (MS), picture exchange (PE), and speech-generating devices (SGDs) in four children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Intervention was introduced across participants in a non-concurrent multiple-baseline design and acquisition of the three communication modes was compared in an alternating treatments design. Children's preference for using MS, PE or the SGD was also assessed. With intervention, all four participants learned to make specific requests using at least one of the three communication modes. The children also showed a preference for one mode. These results extend previous studies by demonstrating (in four new children with ASD) differential acquisition of, and idiosyncratic preferences for, three commonly used alternative communication modes. The present results further suggest faster acquisition and better maintenance with the preferred mode. We conclude that children's preferences for MS, PE, and SGDs should be considered when designing and implementing augmentative and alternative communication interventions. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.005 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=165