ADHD Subtype Differences in Motivational Responsivity but not Inhibitory Control: Evidence From a Reward-Based Variation of the Stop Signal Paradigm / Cynthia L. HUANG-POLLOCK in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36-2 (April-June 2007)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 36-2 (April-June 2007) . - p.127-136 Titre : ADHD Subtype Differences in Motivational Responsivity but not Inhibitory Control: Evidence From a Reward-Based Variation of the Stop Signal Paradigm Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Cynthia L. HUANG-POLLOCK, Auteur ; Amori Yee MIKAMI, Auteur ; Linda PFIFFNER, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : p.127-136 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In this study we examined prepotent motor inhibition and responsiveness to reward using a variation of the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) task in clinic- and community-recruited children ages 7 to 12 with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder—inattentive type (ADHD—I), ADHD—combined type (ADHD—C), and non-ADHD controls. Contrary to theoretical expectations, we found evidence for inhibitory weaknesses in ADHD—I. We also found evidence that although children with ADHD—I were able to improve their inhibitory control given reward-based motivation, the improvement depended on the order of reward conditions. Results suggest that the 2 primary subtypes of ADHD share similar neuropsychological weaknesses in inhibitory control but that there are subtype differences in response to success and failure that contribute to a child's ultimate level of performance. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410701274124 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=144 [article] ADHD Subtype Differences in Motivational Responsivity but not Inhibitory Control: Evidence From a Reward-Based Variation of the Stop Signal Paradigm [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Cynthia L. HUANG-POLLOCK, Auteur ; Amori Yee MIKAMI, Auteur ; Linda PFIFFNER, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur . - 2007 . - p.127-136. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 36-2 (April-June 2007) . - p.127-136 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In this study we examined prepotent motor inhibition and responsiveness to reward using a variation of the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) task in clinic- and community-recruited children ages 7 to 12 with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder—inattentive type (ADHD—I), ADHD—combined type (ADHD—C), and non-ADHD controls. Contrary to theoretical expectations, we found evidence for inhibitory weaknesses in ADHD—I. We also found evidence that although children with ADHD—I were able to improve their inhibitory control given reward-based motivation, the improvement depended on the order of reward conditions. Results suggest that the 2 primary subtypes of ADHD share similar neuropsychological weaknesses in inhibitory control but that there are subtype differences in response to success and failure that contribute to a child's ultimate level of performance. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410701274124 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=144

Annotation: The Development of Antisocial Behavior: An Integrative Causal Model / Benjamin B. LAHEY in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40-5 (July 1999)

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 40-5 (July 1999) . - p.669-682 Titre : Annotation: The Development of Antisocial Behavior: An Integrative Causal Model Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Benjamin B. LAHEY, Auteur ; Irwin D. WALDMAN, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur Année de publication : 1999 Article en page(s) : p.669-682 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=124 [article] Annotation: The Development of Antisocial Behavior: An Integrative Causal Model [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Benjamin B. LAHEY, Auteur ; Irwin D. WALDMAN, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur . - 1999 . - p.669-682. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 40-5 (July 1999) . - p.669-682 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=124

Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD / G. LEONARD BURNS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55-4 (April 2014)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-4 (April 2014) . - p.393-401 Titre : Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : G. LEONARD BURNS, Auteur ; Marcela Alves DE MOURA, Auteur ; Theodore P. BEAUCHAINE, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.393-401 Mots-clés : ADHD  oppositional defiant disorder  bifactor models  dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity theories Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Objective To determine if ADHD/ODD symptoms are better represented by a bifactor model of disruptive behavior [general disruptive behavior factor along with specific inattention (IN), specific hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and specific oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) factors] than an ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD three-factor model. Method Mothers' and fathers' ratings of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD symptoms in a community sample of 4,658 children and adolescents (53% female) from Brazil, Thailand, and the US were used to evaluate the measurement models. Results The bifactor model of disruptive behavior provided a better fit than the three factor model. The bifactor model also occurred with mothers' and fathers' ratings of male and female children and adolescents. Conclusions Consistent with predictions derived from recently articulated dual-pathway and trait-impulsivity models of externalizing liability, and from behavioral genetics studies indicating near complete overlap in vulnerability to ADHD and ODD, ADHD and ODD symptoms arose from a single, general disruptive behavior factor, which accounted for all of the variance in HI subscale scores and over half of the variance IN and ODD subscales. Thus, IN, HI, and ODD subscale scores strongly reflect a general disruptive behavior factor – not the specific content of their respective constructs. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12165 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=230 [article] Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / G. LEONARD BURNS, Auteur ; Marcela Alves DE MOURA, Auteur ; Theodore P. BEAUCHAINE, Auteur ; Keith MCBURNETT, Auteur . - p.393-401. in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-4 (April 2014) . - p.393-401 Mots-clés : ADHD  oppositional defiant disorder  bifactor models  dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity theories Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Objective To determine if ADHD/ODD symptoms are better represented by a bifactor model of disruptive behavior [general disruptive behavior factor along with specific inattention (IN), specific hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and specific oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) factors] than an ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD three-factor model. Method Mothers' and fathers' ratings of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD symptoms in a community sample of 4,658 children and adolescents (53% female) from Brazil, Thailand, and the US were used to evaluate the measurement models. Results The bifactor model of disruptive behavior provided a better fit than the three factor model. The bifactor model also occurred with mothers' and fathers' ratings of male and female children and adolescents. Conclusions Consistent with predictions derived from recently articulated dual-pathway and trait-impulsivity models of externalizing liability, and from behavioral genetics studies indicating near complete overlap in vulnerability to ADHD and ODD, ADHD and ODD symptoms arose from a single, general disruptive behavior factor, which accounted for all of the variance in HI subscale scores and over half of the variance IN and ODD subscales. Thus, IN, HI, and ODD subscale scores strongly reflect a general disruptive behavior factor – not the specific content of their respective constructs. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12165 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=230

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)