
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Judith Semon DUBAS
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheDifferential susceptibility to peer rejection and acceptance: A within-child experiment / Danni LIU in Development and Psychopathology, 38-3 (August 2026)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Differential susceptibility to peer rejection and acceptance: A within-child experiment Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Danni LIU, Auteur ; Anouk VAN DIJK, Auteur ; Zonglin TIAN, Auteur ; Maja DEKOVIC, Auteur ; Judith Semon DUBAS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1564-1576 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : children experiment peer acceptance peer rejection preadolescents sensory processing sensitivity within-child differential susceptibility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The differential susceptibility model suggests that the same children who are more susceptible to peer rejection are also more susceptible to peer acceptance. Testing this within-child assumption, we examined whether a subgroup of children exists who are more reactive to both rejection and acceptance, and whether higher levels of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) characterize this subgroup. We randomly assigned 455 preadolescents (Mage = 10.86, 49.5% boys) to receive either counterbalanced rejection and acceptance feedback (experimental group) or neutral feedback (control group) from online fictitious peers, and assessed their emotional, self-esteem, attributional, and behavioral responses. Results revealed two subgroups of children showing elevated emotional or self-esteem reactivity to both rejection and acceptance, supporting within-child differential susceptibility. However, SPS did not distinguish these subgroups or moderate children’s responses to peer feedback – suggesting limited support for SPS as a differential susceptibility marker to experimentally manipulated peer acceptance and rejection. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579426101382 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=590
in Development and Psychopathology > 38-3 (August 2026) . - p.1564-1576[article] Differential susceptibility to peer rejection and acceptance: A within-child experiment [texte imprimé] / Danni LIU, Auteur ; Anouk VAN DIJK, Auteur ; Zonglin TIAN, Auteur ; Maja DEKOVIC, Auteur ; Judith Semon DUBAS, Auteur . - p.1564-1576.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 38-3 (August 2026) . - p.1564-1576
Mots-clés : children experiment peer acceptance peer rejection preadolescents sensory processing sensitivity within-child differential susceptibility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The differential susceptibility model suggests that the same children who are more susceptible to peer rejection are also more susceptible to peer acceptance. Testing this within-child assumption, we examined whether a subgroup of children exists who are more reactive to both rejection and acceptance, and whether higher levels of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) characterize this subgroup. We randomly assigned 455 preadolescents (Mage = 10.86, 49.5% boys) to receive either counterbalanced rejection and acceptance feedback (experimental group) or neutral feedback (control group) from online fictitious peers, and assessed their emotional, self-esteem, attributional, and behavioral responses. Results revealed two subgroups of children showing elevated emotional or self-esteem reactivity to both rejection and acceptance, supporting within-child differential susceptibility. However, SPS did not distinguish these subgroups or moderate children’s responses to peer feedback – suggesting limited support for SPS as a differential susceptibility marker to experimentally manipulated peer acceptance and rejection. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579426101382 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=590 Linking emotional reactivity “for better and for worse” to differential susceptibility to parenting among kindergartners / Meike SLAGT in Development and Psychopathology, 31-2 (May 2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Linking emotional reactivity “for better and for worse” to differential susceptibility to parenting among kindergartners Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Meike SLAGT, Auteur ; Judith Semon DUBAS, Auteur ; Bruce J. ELLIS, Auteur ; Marcel A.G. VAN AKEN, Auteur ; Maja DEKOVIC, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.741-758 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study used a combination of microlevel observation data and longitudinal questionnaire data to study the relationship between differential reactivity and differential susceptibility, guided by three questions: (a) Does a subset of children exist that is both more likely to respond with increasingly negative emotions to increasingly negative emotions of mothers and with increasingly positive emotions to increasingly positive emotions of mothers (“emotional reactivity”)? (b) Is emotional reactivity associated with temperament markers and rearing environment? (c) Are children who show high emotional reactivity “for better and for worse” also more susceptible to parenting predicting child behavior across a year? A total of 144 Dutch children (45.3% girls) aged four to six participated. Latent profile analyses revealed a group of average reactive children (87%) and a group that was emotionally reactive “for better and for worse” (13%). Highly reactive children scored higher on surgency and received lower levels of negative parenting. Finally, associations of negative and positive parenting with externalizing and prosocial behavior were similar (and nonsignificant) for highly reactive children and average reactive children. The findings suggest that children who are emotionally reactive “for better and for worse” within parent-child interactions are not necessarily more susceptible to parenting on a developmental time scale. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000445 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393
in Development and Psychopathology > 31-2 (May 2019) . - p.741-758[article] Linking emotional reactivity “for better and for worse” to differential susceptibility to parenting among kindergartners [texte imprimé] / Meike SLAGT, Auteur ; Judith Semon DUBAS, Auteur ; Bruce J. ELLIS, Auteur ; Marcel A.G. VAN AKEN, Auteur ; Maja DEKOVIC, Auteur . - p.741-758.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 31-2 (May 2019) . - p.741-758
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study used a combination of microlevel observation data and longitudinal questionnaire data to study the relationship between differential reactivity and differential susceptibility, guided by three questions: (a) Does a subset of children exist that is both more likely to respond with increasingly negative emotions to increasingly negative emotions of mothers and with increasingly positive emotions to increasingly positive emotions of mothers (“emotional reactivity”)? (b) Is emotional reactivity associated with temperament markers and rearing environment? (c) Are children who show high emotional reactivity “for better and for worse” also more susceptible to parenting predicting child behavior across a year? A total of 144 Dutch children (45.3% girls) aged four to six participated. Latent profile analyses revealed a group of average reactive children (87%) and a group that was emotionally reactive “for better and for worse” (13%). Highly reactive children scored higher on surgency and received lower levels of negative parenting. Finally, associations of negative and positive parenting with externalizing and prosocial behavior were similar (and nonsignificant) for highly reactive children and average reactive children. The findings suggest that children who are emotionally reactive “for better and for worse” within parent-child interactions are not necessarily more susceptible to parenting on a developmental time scale. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000445 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393 Siblings versus parents and friends: longitudinal linkages to adolescent externalizing problems / Ivy N. DEFOE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-8 (August 2013)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Siblings versus parents and friends: longitudinal linkages to adolescent externalizing problems Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Ivy N. DEFOE, Auteur ; Loes KEIJSERS, Auteur ; Skyler HAWK, Auteur ; Susan J.T. BRANJE, Auteur ; Judith Semon DUBAS, Auteur ; Kirsten BUIST, Auteur ; Tom FRIJNS, Auteur ; Marcel A.G. VAN AKEN, Auteur ; Hans M. KOOT, Auteur ; Pol A.C. VAN LIER, Auteur ; Wim H.J. MEEUS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.881-889 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Externalizing problems siblings longitudinal negative interaction adolescents friends parents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background It is well documented that friends' externalizing problems and negative parent–child interactions predict externalizing problems in adolescence, but relatively little is known about the role of siblings. This four-wave, multi-informant study investigated linkages of siblings' externalizing problems and sibling–adolescent negative interactions on adolescents' externalizing problems, while examining and controlling for similar linkages with friends and parents. Methods Questionnaire data on externalizing problems and negative interactions were annually collected from 497 Dutch adolescents (M = 13.03 years, SD = 0.52, at baseline), as well as their siblings, mothers, fathers, and friends. Results Cross-lagged panel analyses revealed modest unique longitudinal paths from sibling externalizing problems to adolescent externalizing problems, for male and female adolescents, and for same-sex and mixed-sex sibling dyads, but only from older to younger siblings. Moreover, these paths were above and beyond significant paths from mother–adolescent negative interaction and friend externalizing problems to adolescent externalizing problems, 1 year later. No cross-lagged paths existed between sibling–adolescent negative interaction and adolescent externalizing problems. Conclusions Taken together, it appears that especially older sibling externalizing problems may be a unique social risk factor for adolescent externalizing problems, equal in strength to significant parents' and friends' risk factors. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12049 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=210
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-8 (August 2013) . - p.881-889[article] Siblings versus parents and friends: longitudinal linkages to adolescent externalizing problems [texte imprimé] / Ivy N. DEFOE, Auteur ; Loes KEIJSERS, Auteur ; Skyler HAWK, Auteur ; Susan J.T. BRANJE, Auteur ; Judith Semon DUBAS, Auteur ; Kirsten BUIST, Auteur ; Tom FRIJNS, Auteur ; Marcel A.G. VAN AKEN, Auteur ; Hans M. KOOT, Auteur ; Pol A.C. VAN LIER, Auteur ; Wim H.J. MEEUS, Auteur . - p.881-889.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-8 (August 2013) . - p.881-889
Mots-clés : Externalizing problems siblings longitudinal negative interaction adolescents friends parents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background It is well documented that friends' externalizing problems and negative parent–child interactions predict externalizing problems in adolescence, but relatively little is known about the role of siblings. This four-wave, multi-informant study investigated linkages of siblings' externalizing problems and sibling–adolescent negative interactions on adolescents' externalizing problems, while examining and controlling for similar linkages with friends and parents. Methods Questionnaire data on externalizing problems and negative interactions were annually collected from 497 Dutch adolescents (M = 13.03 years, SD = 0.52, at baseline), as well as their siblings, mothers, fathers, and friends. Results Cross-lagged panel analyses revealed modest unique longitudinal paths from sibling externalizing problems to adolescent externalizing problems, for male and female adolescents, and for same-sex and mixed-sex sibling dyads, but only from older to younger siblings. Moreover, these paths were above and beyond significant paths from mother–adolescent negative interaction and friend externalizing problems to adolescent externalizing problems, 1 year later. No cross-lagged paths existed between sibling–adolescent negative interaction and adolescent externalizing problems. Conclusions Taken together, it appears that especially older sibling externalizing problems may be a unique social risk factor for adolescent externalizing problems, equal in strength to significant parents' and friends' risk factors. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12049 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=210

