
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Roger H. REEVES
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheCapturing cognitive and behavioral variability among individuals with Down syndrome: a latent profile analysis / Marie Moore CHANNELL in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 13 (2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Capturing cognitive and behavioral variability among individuals with Down syndrome: a latent profile analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marie Moore CHANNELL, Auteur ; Laura J. MATTIE, Auteur ; Debra R. HAMILTON, Auteur ; George T. CAPONE, Auteur ; E. Mark MAHONE, Auteur ; Stephanie L. SHERMAN, Auteur ; Tracie C. ROSSER, Auteur ; Roger H. REEVES, Auteur ; Luther G. KALB, Auteur Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adaptation, Psychological Adolescent Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder Child Cognition Down Syndrome Executive Function Female Humans Male Young Adult Adaptive behavior Autism symptomatology Down syndrome Intellectual disability Latent profile analysis Maladaptive behavior Phenotypes Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: There is a high degree of inter- and intra-individual variability observed within the phenotype of Down syndrome. The Down Syndrome Cognition Project was formed to capture this variability by developing a large nationwide database of cognitive, behavioral, health, and genetic information on individuals with Down syndrome, ages 6-25 years. The current study used the Down Syndrome Cognition Project database to characterize cognitive and behavioral variability among individuals with Down syndrome. METHODS: Latent profile analysis was used to identify classes across a sample of 314 participants based on their cognition (IQ and executive functioning), adaptive and maladaptive behavior, and autism spectrum disorder symptomatology. A multivariate multinomial regression model simultaneously examined demographic correlates of class. RESULTS: Results supported a 3-class model. Each class demonstrated a unique profile across the subdomains of cognition and behavior. The "normative" class was the largest (n = 153, 48%) and displayed a relatively consistent profile of cognition and adaptive behavior, with low rates of maladaptive behavior and autism symptomatology. The "cognitive" class (n = 109, 35%) displayed low cognitive scores and adaptive behavior and more autism symptomatology, but with low rates of maladaptive behavior. The "behavioral" class, the smallest group (n = 52, 17%), demonstrated higher rates of maladaptive behavior and autism symptomatology, but with cognition levels similar to the "normative" class; their adaptive behavior scores fell in between the other two classes. Household income and sex were the only demographic variables to differ among classes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of subtyping the cognitive and behavioral phenotype among individuals with Down syndrome to identify more homogeneous classes for future intervention and etiologic studies. Results also demonstrate the feasibility of using latent profile analysis to distinguish subtypes in this population. Limitations and future directions are discussed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-021-09365-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=574
in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 13 (2021)[article] Capturing cognitive and behavioral variability among individuals with Down syndrome: a latent profile analysis [texte imprimé] / Marie Moore CHANNELL, Auteur ; Laura J. MATTIE, Auteur ; Debra R. HAMILTON, Auteur ; George T. CAPONE, Auteur ; E. Mark MAHONE, Auteur ; Stephanie L. SHERMAN, Auteur ; Tracie C. ROSSER, Auteur ; Roger H. REEVES, Auteur ; Luther G. KALB, Auteur.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 13 (2021)
Mots-clés : Adaptation, Psychological Adolescent Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder Child Cognition Down Syndrome Executive Function Female Humans Male Young Adult Adaptive behavior Autism symptomatology Down syndrome Intellectual disability Latent profile analysis Maladaptive behavior Phenotypes Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: There is a high degree of inter- and intra-individual variability observed within the phenotype of Down syndrome. The Down Syndrome Cognition Project was formed to capture this variability by developing a large nationwide database of cognitive, behavioral, health, and genetic information on individuals with Down syndrome, ages 6-25 years. The current study used the Down Syndrome Cognition Project database to characterize cognitive and behavioral variability among individuals with Down syndrome. METHODS: Latent profile analysis was used to identify classes across a sample of 314 participants based on their cognition (IQ and executive functioning), adaptive and maladaptive behavior, and autism spectrum disorder symptomatology. A multivariate multinomial regression model simultaneously examined demographic correlates of class. RESULTS: Results supported a 3-class model. Each class demonstrated a unique profile across the subdomains of cognition and behavior. The "normative" class was the largest (n = 153, 48%) and displayed a relatively consistent profile of cognition and adaptive behavior, with low rates of maladaptive behavior and autism symptomatology. The "cognitive" class (n = 109, 35%) displayed low cognitive scores and adaptive behavior and more autism symptomatology, but with low rates of maladaptive behavior. The "behavioral" class, the smallest group (n = 52, 17%), demonstrated higher rates of maladaptive behavior and autism symptomatology, but with cognition levels similar to the "normative" class; their adaptive behavior scores fell in between the other two classes. Household income and sex were the only demographic variables to differ among classes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of subtyping the cognitive and behavioral phenotype among individuals with Down syndrome to identify more homogeneous classes for future intervention and etiologic studies. Results also demonstrate the feasibility of using latent profile analysis to distinguish subtypes in this population. Limitations and future directions are discussed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-021-09365-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=574 Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome / Jamie O. EDGIN in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2-3 (September 2010)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jamie O. EDGIN, Auteur ; Gina M. MASON, Auteur ; Melissa J. ALLMAN, Auteur ; George T. CAPONE, Auteur ; Iser DELEON, Auteur ; Cheryl MASLEN, Auteur ; Roger H. REEVES, Auteur ; Stephanie L. SHERMAN, Auteur ; Lynn NADEL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.149-164 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Neurocognitive assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated test battery. To meet this need, the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery (ACTB) has been developed specifically to assess the cognitive phenotype in Down syndrome (DS). The ACTB includes neuropsychological assessments chosen to 1) assess a range of skills, 2) be non-verbal so as to not confound the neuropsychological assessment with language demands, 3) have distributional properties appropriate for research studies to identify genetic modifiers of variation, 4) show sensitivity to within and between sample differences, 5) have specific correlates with brain function, and 6) be applicable to a wide age range and across contexts. The ACTB includes tests of general cognitive ability and prefrontal, hippocampal and cerebellar function. These tasks were drawn from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB) and other established paradigms. Alongside the cognitive testing battery we administered benchmark and parent-report assessments of cognition and behavior. Individuals with DS (n=74, ages 7-38 years) and mental age (MA) matched controls (n=50, ages 3-8 years) were tested across 3 sites. A subsample of these groups were used for between-group comparisons, including 55 individuals with DS and 36 mental age matched controls. The ACTB allows for low floor performance levels and participant loss. Floor effects were greater in younger children. Individuals with DS were impaired on a number ACTB tests in comparison to a MA-matched sample, with some areas of spared ability, particularly on tests requiring extensive motor coordination. Battery measures correlated with parent report of behavior and development. The ACTB provided consistent results across contexts, including home vs. lab visits, cross-site, and among individuals with a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds and differences in ethnicity. The ACTB will be useful in a range of outcome studies, including clinical trials and the identification of important genetic components of cognitive disability. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11689-010-9054-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=342
in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 2-3 (September 2010) . - p.149-164[article] Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome [texte imprimé] / Jamie O. EDGIN, Auteur ; Gina M. MASON, Auteur ; Melissa J. ALLMAN, Auteur ; George T. CAPONE, Auteur ; Iser DELEON, Auteur ; Cheryl MASLEN, Auteur ; Roger H. REEVES, Auteur ; Stephanie L. SHERMAN, Auteur ; Lynn NADEL, Auteur . - p.149-164.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 2-3 (September 2010) . - p.149-164
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Neurocognitive assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated test battery. To meet this need, the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery (ACTB) has been developed specifically to assess the cognitive phenotype in Down syndrome (DS). The ACTB includes neuropsychological assessments chosen to 1) assess a range of skills, 2) be non-verbal so as to not confound the neuropsychological assessment with language demands, 3) have distributional properties appropriate for research studies to identify genetic modifiers of variation, 4) show sensitivity to within and between sample differences, 5) have specific correlates with brain function, and 6) be applicable to a wide age range and across contexts. The ACTB includes tests of general cognitive ability and prefrontal, hippocampal and cerebellar function. These tasks were drawn from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB) and other established paradigms. Alongside the cognitive testing battery we administered benchmark and parent-report assessments of cognition and behavior. Individuals with DS (n=74, ages 7-38 years) and mental age (MA) matched controls (n=50, ages 3-8 years) were tested across 3 sites. A subsample of these groups were used for between-group comparisons, including 55 individuals with DS and 36 mental age matched controls. The ACTB allows for low floor performance levels and participant loss. Floor effects were greater in younger children. Individuals with DS were impaired on a number ACTB tests in comparison to a MA-matched sample, with some areas of spared ability, particularly on tests requiring extensive motor coordination. Battery measures correlated with parent report of behavior and development. The ACTB provided consistent results across contexts, including home vs. lab visits, cross-site, and among individuals with a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds and differences in ethnicity. The ACTB will be useful in a range of outcome studies, including clinical trials and the identification of important genetic components of cognitive disability. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11689-010-9054-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=342

