Aetiology of shame and its association with adolescent depression and anxiety: results from a prospective twin and sibling study / M. NIKOLI? in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63-1 (January 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 63-1 (January 2022) . - p.99-108 Titre : Aetiology of shame and its association with adolescent depression and anxiety: results from a prospective twin and sibling study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : M. NIKOLI?, Auteur ; L. J. HANNIGAN, Auteur ; G. KREBS, Auteur ; A. STERNE, Auteur ; A. M. GREGORY, Auteur ; T. C. ELEY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.99-108 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent  Anxiety/epidemiology/genetics  Child  Depression/epidemiology/genetics  Female  Humans  Male  Prospective Studies  Shame  Siblings  Young Adult  Adolescence  anxiety  depression  twins Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Shame is considered a maladaptive self-conscious emotion that commonly co-occurs alongside depression and anxiety. Little is known, however, about the aetiology of shame and its associations with depression and anxiety. We estimated, for the first time, genetic and environmental influences on shame and on its associations with depression and anxiety in adolescence. METHODS: The sample was twin and sibling pairs from the Genesis 1219 Study (Time 1, N?=?2,685; males 42.8%, M(age) ?=?14.95, SD?=?1.67, age range: 12-21; Time 2, N?=?1618; males 39.7%, M(age) ?=?16.97, SD?=?1.64, age range: 14-23). Participants completed validated questionnaires to measure shame (at Time 1), depression and anxiety (at Times 1 and 2). RESULTS: Shame was moderately to strongly associated with concurrent depression and anxiety. Prospectively, shame was significantly associated with an increase in depression, but not anxiety. Genetic analyses revealed that shame was moderately heritable with substantial nonshared environmental influence. The associations between shame and concurrent depression and anxiety were primarily accounted for by overlapping genetic influences. Prospectively, the association between shame and later depression was primarily accounted for by genetic and nonshared environmental influences shared with earlier depression. The unique association between shame and later depression was mostly explained by common nonshared environmental influences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings offer novel evidence regarding aetiology of shame-although moderately heritable, shame in adolescents may also result from nonshared environmental factors. Genetic and nonshared environmental influences contribute to the co-occurrence of shame with depression and anxiety. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13465 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=456 [article] Aetiology of shame and its association with adolescent depression and anxiety: results from a prospective twin and sibling study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / M. NIKOLI?, Auteur ; L. J. HANNIGAN, Auteur ; G. KREBS, Auteur ; A. STERNE, Auteur ; A. M. GREGORY, Auteur ; T. C. ELEY, Auteur . - p.99-108. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 63-1 (January 2022) . - p.99-108 Mots-clés : Adolescent  Anxiety/epidemiology/genetics  Child  Depression/epidemiology/genetics  Female  Humans  Male  Prospective Studies  Shame  Siblings  Young Adult  Adolescence  anxiety  depression  twins Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Shame is considered a maladaptive self-conscious emotion that commonly co-occurs alongside depression and anxiety. Little is known, however, about the aetiology of shame and its associations with depression and anxiety. We estimated, for the first time, genetic and environmental influences on shame and on its associations with depression and anxiety in adolescence. METHODS: The sample was twin and sibling pairs from the Genesis 1219 Study (Time 1, N?=?2,685; males 42.8%, M(age) ?=?14.95, SD?=?1.67, age range: 12-21; Time 2, N?=?1618; males 39.7%, M(age) ?=?16.97, SD?=?1.64, age range: 14-23). Participants completed validated questionnaires to measure shame (at Time 1), depression and anxiety (at Times 1 and 2). RESULTS: Shame was moderately to strongly associated with concurrent depression and anxiety. Prospectively, shame was significantly associated with an increase in depression, but not anxiety. Genetic analyses revealed that shame was moderately heritable with substantial nonshared environmental influence. The associations between shame and concurrent depression and anxiety were primarily accounted for by overlapping genetic influences. Prospectively, the association between shame and later depression was primarily accounted for by genetic and nonshared environmental influences shared with earlier depression. The unique association between shame and later depression was mostly explained by common nonshared environmental influences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings offer novel evidence regarding aetiology of shame-although moderately heritable, shame in adolescents may also result from nonshared environmental factors. Genetic and nonshared environmental influences contribute to the co-occurrence of shame with depression and anxiety. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13465 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=456

Teacher assessments during compulsory education are as reliable, stable and heritable as standardized test scores / K. RIMFELD in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60-12 (December 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-12 (December 2019) . - p.1278-1288 Titre : Teacher assessments during compulsory education are as reliable, stable and heritable as standardized test scores Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : K. RIMFELD, Auteur ; M. MALANCHINI, Auteur ; L. J. HANNIGAN, Auteur ; Philip S. DALE, Auteur ; R. ALLEN, Auteur ; S. A. HART, Auteur ; R. PLOMIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1278-1288 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Educational achievement  quantitative genetics  standardized exams  teacher assessment  twin models Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Children in the UK go through rigorous teacher assessments and standardized exams throughout compulsory (elementary and secondary) education, culminating with the GCSE exams (General Certificate of Secondary Education) at the age of 16 and A-level exams (Advanced Certificate of Secondary Education) at the age of 18. These exams are a major tipping point directing young individuals towards different lifelong trajectories. However, little is known about the associations between teacher assessments and exam performance or how well these two measurement approaches predict educational outcomes at the end of compulsory education and beyond. METHODS: The current investigation used the UK-representative Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) sample of over 5,000 twin pairs studied longitudinally from childhood to young adulthood (age 7-18). We used teacher assessment and exam performance across development to investigate, using genetically sensitive designs, the associations between teacher assessment and standardized exam scores, as well as teacher assessments' prediction of exam scores at ages 16 and 18, and university enrolment. RESULTS: Teacher assessments of achievement are as reliable, stable and heritable (~60%) as test scores at every stage of the educational experience. Teacher and test scores correlate strongly phenotypically (r ~ .70) and genetically (genetic correlation ~.80) both contemporaneously and over time. Earlier exam performance accounts for additional variance in standardized exam results (~10%) at age 16, when controlling for teacher assessments. However, exam performance explains less additional variance in later academic success, ~5% for exam grades at 18, and ~3% for university entry, when controlling for teacher assessments. Teacher assessments also predict additional variance in later exam performance and university enrolment, when controlling for previous exam scores. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers can reliably and validly monitor students' progress, abilities and inclinations. High-stakes exams may shift educational experience away from learning towards exam performance. For these reasons, we suggest that teacher assessments could replace some, or all, high-stakes exams. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13070 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=412 [article] Teacher assessments during compulsory education are as reliable, stable and heritable as standardized test scores [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / K. RIMFELD, Auteur ; M. MALANCHINI, Auteur ; L. J. HANNIGAN, Auteur ; Philip S. DALE, Auteur ; R. ALLEN, Auteur ; S. A. HART, Auteur ; R. PLOMIN, Auteur . - p.1278-1288. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-12 (December 2019) . - p.1278-1288 Mots-clés : Educational achievement  quantitative genetics  standardized exams  teacher assessment  twin models Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Children in the UK go through rigorous teacher assessments and standardized exams throughout compulsory (elementary and secondary) education, culminating with the GCSE exams (General Certificate of Secondary Education) at the age of 16 and A-level exams (Advanced Certificate of Secondary Education) at the age of 18. These exams are a major tipping point directing young individuals towards different lifelong trajectories. However, little is known about the associations between teacher assessments and exam performance or how well these two measurement approaches predict educational outcomes at the end of compulsory education and beyond. METHODS: The current investigation used the UK-representative Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) sample of over 5,000 twin pairs studied longitudinally from childhood to young adulthood (age 7-18). We used teacher assessment and exam performance across development to investigate, using genetically sensitive designs, the associations between teacher assessment and standardized exam scores, as well as teacher assessments' prediction of exam scores at ages 16 and 18, and university enrolment. RESULTS: Teacher assessments of achievement are as reliable, stable and heritable (~60%) as test scores at every stage of the educational experience. Teacher and test scores correlate strongly phenotypically (r ~ .70) and genetically (genetic correlation ~.80) both contemporaneously and over time. Earlier exam performance accounts for additional variance in standardized exam results (~10%) at age 16, when controlling for teacher assessments. However, exam performance explains less additional variance in later academic success, ~5% for exam grades at 18, and ~3% for university entry, when controlling for teacher assessments. Teacher assessments also predict additional variance in later exam performance and university enrolment, when controlling for previous exam scores. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers can reliably and validly monitor students' progress, abilities and inclinations. High-stakes exams may shift educational experience away from learning towards exam performance. For these reasons, we suggest that teacher assessments could replace some, or all, high-stakes exams. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13070 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=412

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)