
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Orli SCHWARTZ
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheDevelopment of morning-eveningness in adolescence: implications for brain development and psychopathology / Rebecca COOPER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-3 (March 2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Development of morning-eveningness in adolescence: implications for brain development and psychopathology Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Rebecca COOPER, Auteur ; Maria A. DI BIASE, Auteur ; Bei BEI, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Sarah WHITTLE, Auteur ; Vanessa CROPLEY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.449-460 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Morning-evening preference is defined as an individual's preference for a morning- or evening-oriented rhythm. Across adolescence, a preference for eveningness becomes more predominant. Although eveningness is cross-sectionally associated with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology, few studies have examined developmental changes in eveningness and its potential biological substrates. Here, we investigated the longitudinal relationships among the trajectory of eveningness preference, internalizing and externalizing psychopathology and white matter development, across adolescence. Methods Two-hundred and nine adolescents (49% male) were assessed longitudinally at four separate time points between 12 and 19 years of age. Morning-evening preference and internalizing and externalizing symptoms were assessed at each time point. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired on a subset of participants at the final two time points to estimate changes in global mean fractional anisotropy (FA). Linear mixed models were performed to estimate the change in eveningness over time. A series of linear regression models assessed the influence of change in eveningness on psychopathology and white matter development at age 19. Results Across the sample, a preference for eveningness became more predominant by 19 years of age. Greater individual-level change towards eveningness significantly predicted greater severity in externalizing, but not internalizing, symptoms at 19 years of age. In contrast, change in psychopathology from 12 to 19 years of age was not associated with morning-eveningness at age 19. A change towards eveningness predicted an attenuated increase in FA between 17 and 19 years of age. Conclusions This study suggests that developmental changes in morning-evening preference may predict both neurodevelopmental and psychological outcomes in adolescents. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13718 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.449-460[article] Development of morning-eveningness in adolescence: implications for brain development and psychopathology [texte imprimé] / Rebecca COOPER, Auteur ; Maria A. DI BIASE, Auteur ; Bei BEI, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Sarah WHITTLE, Auteur ; Vanessa CROPLEY, Auteur . - p.449-460.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.449-460
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Morning-evening preference is defined as an individual's preference for a morning- or evening-oriented rhythm. Across adolescence, a preference for eveningness becomes more predominant. Although eveningness is cross-sectionally associated with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology, few studies have examined developmental changes in eveningness and its potential biological substrates. Here, we investigated the longitudinal relationships among the trajectory of eveningness preference, internalizing and externalizing psychopathology and white matter development, across adolescence. Methods Two-hundred and nine adolescents (49% male) were assessed longitudinally at four separate time points between 12 and 19 years of age. Morning-evening preference and internalizing and externalizing symptoms were assessed at each time point. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired on a subset of participants at the final two time points to estimate changes in global mean fractional anisotropy (FA). Linear mixed models were performed to estimate the change in eveningness over time. A series of linear regression models assessed the influence of change in eveningness on psychopathology and white matter development at age 19. Results Across the sample, a preference for eveningness became more predominant by 19 years of age. Greater individual-level change towards eveningness significantly predicted greater severity in externalizing, but not internalizing, symptoms at 19 years of age. In contrast, change in psychopathology from 12 to 19 years of age was not associated with morning-eveningness at age 19. A change towards eveningness predicted an attenuated increase in FA between 17 and 19 years of age. Conclusions This study suggests that developmental changes in morning-evening preference may predict both neurodevelopmental and psychological outcomes in adolescents. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13718 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493 Parenting x Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? / Camille DEANE in Development and Psychopathology, 32-1 (February 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Parenting x Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Camille DEANE, Auteur ; Nandita VIJAYAKUMAR, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Julian G. SIMMONS, Auteur ; Chad A. BOUSMAN, Auteur ; Christos PANTELIS, Auteur ; Sarah WHITTLE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.139-150 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : brain development depression diathesis-stress differential susceptibility well-being Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : It is unclear how individual differences in parenting and brain development interact to influence adolescent mental health outcomes. This study examined interactions between structural brain development and observed maternal parenting behavior in the prediction of adolescent depressive symptoms and psychological well-being. Whether findings supported diathesis-stress or differential susceptibility frameworks was tested. Participants completed observed interactions with their mothers during early adolescence (age 13), and the frequency of positive and aggressive maternal behavior were coded. Adolescents also completed structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at three time points: mean ages 13, 17, and 19. Regression models analyzed interactions between maternal behavior and longitudinal brain development in the prediction of late adolescent (age 19) outcomes. Indices designed to distinguish between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility effects were employed. Results supported differential susceptibility: less thinning of frontal regions was associated with higher well-being in the context of low levels of aggressive maternal behavior, and lower well-being in the context of high levels of aggressive maternal behavior. Findings suggest that reduced frontal cortical thinning during adolescence may underlie increased sensitivity to maternal aggressive behavior for better and worse and highlight the importance of investigating biological vulnerability versus susceptibility. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001475 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415
in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.139-150[article] Parenting x Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? [texte imprimé] / Camille DEANE, Auteur ; Nandita VIJAYAKUMAR, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Julian G. SIMMONS, Auteur ; Chad A. BOUSMAN, Auteur ; Christos PANTELIS, Auteur ; Sarah WHITTLE, Auteur . - p.139-150.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.139-150
Mots-clés : brain development depression diathesis-stress differential susceptibility well-being Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : It is unclear how individual differences in parenting and brain development interact to influence adolescent mental health outcomes. This study examined interactions between structural brain development and observed maternal parenting behavior in the prediction of adolescent depressive symptoms and psychological well-being. Whether findings supported diathesis-stress or differential susceptibility frameworks was tested. Participants completed observed interactions with their mothers during early adolescence (age 13), and the frequency of positive and aggressive maternal behavior were coded. Adolescents also completed structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at three time points: mean ages 13, 17, and 19. Regression models analyzed interactions between maternal behavior and longitudinal brain development in the prediction of late adolescent (age 19) outcomes. Indices designed to distinguish between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility effects were employed. Results supported differential susceptibility: less thinning of frontal regions was associated with higher well-being in the context of low levels of aggressive maternal behavior, and lower well-being in the context of high levels of aggressive maternal behavior. Findings suggest that reduced frontal cortical thinning during adolescence may underlie increased sensitivity to maternal aggressive behavior for better and worse and highlight the importance of investigating biological vulnerability versus susceptibility. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001475 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415 Who benefits from adolescent sleep interventions? Moderators of treatment efficacy in a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention for at-risk adolescents / Matthew J. BLAKE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-6 (June 2018)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Who benefits from adolescent sleep interventions? Moderators of treatment efficacy in a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention for at-risk adolescents Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Matthew J. BLAKE, Auteur ; Laura M. BLAKE, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Monika RANITI, Auteur ; Joanna M. WALOSZEK, Auteur ; Greg MURRAY, Auteur ; Julian G. SIMMONS, Auteur ; Elizabeth LANDAU, Auteur ; Ronald E. DAHL, Auteur ; Dana L. MCMAKIN, Auteur ; Paul DUDGEON, Auteur ; John TRINDER, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.637-649 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Sleep adolescence anxiety depression intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to test moderators of therapeutic improvement in an adolescent cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention. Specifically, we examined whether the effects of the program on postintervention sleep outcomes were dependent on participant gender and/or measures of sleep duration, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy prior to the interventions. METHOD: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial conducted with 123 adolescent participants (female = 59.34%; mean age = 14.48 years, range 12.04-16.31 years) who had elevated levels of sleep problems and anxiety symptoms. Participants were randomized into either a group sleep improvement intervention (n = 63) or group active control 'study skills' intervention (n = 60). The sleep intervention ('Sleep SENSE') was cognitive behavioral in approach, incorporating sleep education, sleep hygiene, stimulus control, and cognitive restructuring, but also had added anxiety-reducing, mindfulness, and motivational interviewing elements. Components of the active control intervention ('Study SENSE') included personal organization, persuasive writing, critical reading, referencing, memorization, and note taking. Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) and wore an actigraph and completed a sleep diary for five school nights prior to the interventions. Sleep assessments were repeated at postintervention. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612001177842; http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx?searchTxt=ACTRN12612001177842&isBasic=T rue). RESULTS: The results showed that compared with the active control intervention, the effect of the sleep intervention on self-reported sleep quality (PSQI global score) at postintervention was statistically significant among adolescents with relatively moderate to high SCAS, CES-D, and GSE prior to the intervention, but not among adolescents with relatively low SCAS, CES-D, and GSE prior to the intervention. The results were consistent across genders. However, the effects of the sleep intervention on actigraphy-measured sleep onset latency and sleep diary-measured sleep efficiency at postintervention were not dependent on actigraphy-measured total sleep time, SCAS, CES-D, or GSE prior to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that some sleep benefits of adolescent cognitive-behavioral sleep interventions are greatest among those with higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, suggesting that this may be an especially propitious group to whom intervention efforts could be targeted. Furthermore, adolescents with lower levels of self-efficacy may need further targeted support (e.g. additional motivational interviewing) to help them reach treatment goals. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12842 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=363
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-6 (June 2018) . - p.637-649[article] Who benefits from adolescent sleep interventions? Moderators of treatment efficacy in a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention for at-risk adolescents [texte imprimé] / Matthew J. BLAKE, Auteur ; Laura M. BLAKE, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Monika RANITI, Auteur ; Joanna M. WALOSZEK, Auteur ; Greg MURRAY, Auteur ; Julian G. SIMMONS, Auteur ; Elizabeth LANDAU, Auteur ; Ronald E. DAHL, Auteur ; Dana L. MCMAKIN, Auteur ; Paul DUDGEON, Auteur ; John TRINDER, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur . - p.637-649.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-6 (June 2018) . - p.637-649
Mots-clés : Sleep adolescence anxiety depression intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to test moderators of therapeutic improvement in an adolescent cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention. Specifically, we examined whether the effects of the program on postintervention sleep outcomes were dependent on participant gender and/or measures of sleep duration, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy prior to the interventions. METHOD: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial conducted with 123 adolescent participants (female = 59.34%; mean age = 14.48 years, range 12.04-16.31 years) who had elevated levels of sleep problems and anxiety symptoms. Participants were randomized into either a group sleep improvement intervention (n = 63) or group active control 'study skills' intervention (n = 60). The sleep intervention ('Sleep SENSE') was cognitive behavioral in approach, incorporating sleep education, sleep hygiene, stimulus control, and cognitive restructuring, but also had added anxiety-reducing, mindfulness, and motivational interviewing elements. Components of the active control intervention ('Study SENSE') included personal organization, persuasive writing, critical reading, referencing, memorization, and note taking. Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) and wore an actigraph and completed a sleep diary for five school nights prior to the interventions. Sleep assessments were repeated at postintervention. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612001177842; http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx?searchTxt=ACTRN12612001177842&isBasic=T rue). RESULTS: The results showed that compared with the active control intervention, the effect of the sleep intervention on self-reported sleep quality (PSQI global score) at postintervention was statistically significant among adolescents with relatively moderate to high SCAS, CES-D, and GSE prior to the intervention, but not among adolescents with relatively low SCAS, CES-D, and GSE prior to the intervention. The results were consistent across genders. However, the effects of the sleep intervention on actigraphy-measured sleep onset latency and sleep diary-measured sleep efficiency at postintervention were not dependent on actigraphy-measured total sleep time, SCAS, CES-D, or GSE prior to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that some sleep benefits of adolescent cognitive-behavioral sleep interventions are greatest among those with higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, suggesting that this may be an especially propitious group to whom intervention efforts could be targeted. Furthermore, adolescents with lower levels of self-efficacy may need further targeted support (e.g. additional motivational interviewing) to help them reach treatment goals. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12842 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=363

