Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised for use with deaf children and young people / B. WRIGHT in Autism, 26-2 (February 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 26-2 (February 2022) . - p.446-459 Titre : Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised for use with deaf children and young people Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : B. WRIGHT, Auteur ; H. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; J. SWEETMAN, Auteur ; R. HODKINSON, Auteur ; E. HAYWARD, Auteur ; A. RALPH-LEWIS, Auteur ; C. TEIGE, Auteur ; M. BLAND, Auteur ; A. LE COUTEUR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.446-459 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised  Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised Deaf Adaptation  British Sign Language  Delphi consensus methodology  autism spectrum disorder  children  deaf  deaf culture  gesture  language  modified Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism assessment processes need to improve for deaf children as they are currently being diagnosed later than their hearing counterparts and misdiagnosis can occur. We took one of the most commonly used parent developmental interviews for autism spectrum disorder the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and adapted it using international expert advice. Modifications were proposed and agreed by the expert panel for 45% of items; the remaining 55% of items were unchanged. We then tested the revised version, adapted for deaf children (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation), in a UK sample of 78 parents/carers of deaf children with autism spectrum disorder and 126 parents/carers with deaf children without autism spectrum disorder. When compared to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline standard clinical assessments, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation diagnostic algorithm threshold scores could identify those deaf children with a definite diagnosis (true autism spectrum disorder positives) well (sensitivity of 89% (79%-96%)) and those deaf children who did not have autism spectrum disorder (true autism spectrum disorder negatives) well (specificity of 81% (70%-89%)). Our findings indicate that the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation is likely to prove a useful measure for the assessment of deaf children with suspected autism spectrum disorder and that further research would be helpful. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211029116 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=452 [article] Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised for use with deaf children and young people [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / B. WRIGHT, Auteur ; H. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; J. SWEETMAN, Auteur ; R. HODKINSON, Auteur ; E. HAYWARD, Auteur ; A. RALPH-LEWIS, Auteur ; C. TEIGE, Auteur ; M. BLAND, Auteur ; A. LE COUTEUR, Auteur . - p.446-459. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 26-2 (February 2022) . - p.446-459 Mots-clés : Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised  Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised Deaf Adaptation  British Sign Language  Delphi consensus methodology  autism spectrum disorder  children  deaf  deaf culture  gesture  language  modified Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism assessment processes need to improve for deaf children as they are currently being diagnosed later than their hearing counterparts and misdiagnosis can occur. We took one of the most commonly used parent developmental interviews for autism spectrum disorder the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and adapted it using international expert advice. Modifications were proposed and agreed by the expert panel for 45% of items; the remaining 55% of items were unchanged. We then tested the revised version, adapted for deaf children (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation), in a UK sample of 78 parents/carers of deaf children with autism spectrum disorder and 126 parents/carers with deaf children without autism spectrum disorder. When compared to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline standard clinical assessments, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation diagnostic algorithm threshold scores could identify those deaf children with a definite diagnosis (true autism spectrum disorder positives) well (sensitivity of 89% (79%-96%)) and those deaf children who did not have autism spectrum disorder (true autism spectrum disorder negatives) well (specificity of 81% (70%-89%)). Our findings indicate that the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation is likely to prove a useful measure for the assessment of deaf children with suspected autism spectrum disorder and that further research would be helpful. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211029116 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=452

Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people / H. PHILLIPS in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-2 (February 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.553-568 Titre : Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : H. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; B. WRIGHT, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; H. MCCONACHIE, Auteur ; J. SWEETMAN, Auteur ; R. HARGATE, Auteur ; R. HODKINSON, Auteur ; M. BLAND, Auteur ; H. GEORGE, Auteur ; A. HUGHES, Auteur ; E. HAYWARD, Auteur ; V. F. G. DE LAS HERAS, Auteur ; A. LE COUTEUR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.553-568 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent  Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis  Autistic Disorder  Child  Humans  Sensitivity and Specificity  Specialization  Assessment  Autism Spectrum Disorder  Autism diagnostic observation schedule  Deaf  Delphi consensus  Diagnosis  Sign language  research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2-18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1-3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65-89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66-89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04931-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455 [article] Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / H. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; B. WRIGHT, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; H. MCCONACHIE, Auteur ; J. SWEETMAN, Auteur ; R. HARGATE, Auteur ; R. HODKINSON, Auteur ; M. BLAND, Auteur ; H. GEORGE, Auteur ; A. HUGHES, Auteur ; E. HAYWARD, Auteur ; V. F. G. DE LAS HERAS, Auteur ; A. LE COUTEUR, Auteur . - p.553-568. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.553-568 Mots-clés : Adolescent  Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis  Autistic Disorder  Child  Humans  Sensitivity and Specificity  Specialization  Assessment  Autism Spectrum Disorder  Autism diagnostic observation schedule  Deaf  Delphi consensus  Diagnosis  Sign language  research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2-18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1-3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65-89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66-89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04931-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)